[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-13 10:47 EST --- Glad to see this! Google Gadgets was featured as the front-page article in the June 12 lwn.net: http://lwn.net/Articles/285099/ I'd add to the description something about this supporting "cross-platform development". "Compatible with" could just mean that it has a common format for data files, but it appears that Google gadgets provides a limited "write once, run everywhere" platform for some kinds of apps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-13 10:57 EST --- FYI the newest is 0.9.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||l.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-28 14:04 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |l.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 01:35 EST --- Ah yes, will update. I lifted the description mostly from the project page description at the time, it was a bit unpolished. Let's see if the xulrunner backend works properly, now that Fedora-9 has the stable version of xulrunner; it was a bit flaky last month. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 02:18 EST --- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm GTK version works well (some gadgets are not compatible with Linux -- the obvious system-related ones, and some that ought to be cross-platform). Qt version has some display issue but also works. I'm currently bundling both and have not included desktop file launchers -- will discuss whether we should have a common library and two subpackage, or keep it intact. In any case, I'll add two desktop launchers, with the GTK one configured to NotShowIn=KDE and the Qt one OnlyShowIn=KDE -- or we can make KDE use the GTK binary and disable the Qt interface for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 21:28 EST --- Disabling -qt for now sounds good to me: maybe you can make it a build option for the future? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 10:18 EST --- For 0.9.3-1: * Version - Well, during the time that this bug was assigned to nobody, the upstream version is changed to 0.10.0... Would you upgrade again? * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, please consider to use: -- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p" -- Actually this saves most of the files to be installed - 'INSTALL="install -p"' usually works for recent autotools based Makefiles - And 'CPPROG="cp -p"' usually works for Makefiles using "install-sh" for installation. * Dependency - Please check for -devel subpackage. A. For example, libggadget-dbus-1.0.pc contains the line: -- Requires: libggadget-1.0 dbus-1 -- This means -devel subpackage should have "Requires: dbus-devel" B. Another example is that %_includedir/google-gadgets/ggadget/gtk/tooltip.h contains: -- 19 20 #include 21 -- This means that -devel subpackage should have "Requires: gtk2-devel". Then: (In reply to comment #6) > Disabling -qt for now sounds good to me: maybe you can make it a build option > for the future? I feel that enabling qt side does not seem to be bad, however would you tell us your opinion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 16:14 EST --- I might be able to get a 0.10 SRPM tomorrow -- there are some compilation issues with it. Will go ahead and split the frontends out, but I'll just keep a single -devel package (developers can bite the hard drive space bullet!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||l.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-24 13:10 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-06 09:59:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-14 10:13:49 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Patrice FERLET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #12 from Patrice FERLET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 21:23:39 EDT --- I did another spec file wich create 3 packages: - google-gadgets - google-gadget-gtk - google-gadget-qt My troubles appears with mock to compile on i386 (works great in x86-64). I will give you my src.rpm tomorrow. Maybe a merge between our 2 specs cool be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-25 12:13:30 EDT --- Michel, I will once close this bug if no response is received from you within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |il.com) | --- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-25 21:41:14 EDT --- Sorry about that. Didn't have a chance to look at the problems with 0.10.0, which is still present in 0.10.1 but, as it turns out, just requires using LD_LIBRARY_PATH during the build process. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec UI split into -gtk and -qt subpackages, both providing -frontend which the base package depends on. The GTK interface is more mature at this point -- the Qt interface does not seem to provide a working dock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26 12:30:26 EDT --- Umm... doesn't build on dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=785923 By the way you can check if your srpm can be rebuilt correctly using koji like: $ koji build --scratch where can be dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate or dist-f8-updates-candidate (and some olpc related target). When the rebuild succeeds, the result binary rpms and some logs are put under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26 15:37:08 EDT --- There were some missing build requirements, sorry. Should have tried a scratch build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=787490 http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-27 13:17:00 EDT --- Will review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-28 02:55:26 EDT
---
For 0.10.1-2:
* About rpath/linking issue
-
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
# Set LD_LIBRARY_PATH: desktop file creation requires access to the libraries
# which have not been installed
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/ggadget/.libs
-
- Well, actually the reason you have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH temporarily
is that you killed rpath completely even on build stage under builddir
by the two lines above.
Usually removing rpath by this way just "breaks" libtool and especially
when the package has its own library path (like %_libdir/%name or so)
linking fails like this way.
The reason this package adds standard rpath is
- When linking libtool tries to find out standard libraries only
from /usr/lib and /lib, so on 64 bits architectures the unsearched
/usr/lib64 or so is added as rpath.
(Fedora libtool on 64 bits actually searches libraries also from
/usr/lib64 and so on. You can check this by the diff of %_bindir/libtool
(this is bash script) on i386 and x86_64 archs)
Note that libtool is created from configure
- hosts/*/Makefile.in has unneeded -R$(libdir) :(
So I recommend:
--
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}-for-linux-%{version}
# Permission fixes
chmod -x ggadget/qt/utilities.h
# Rpath issue
# Add library search path
sed -i.libdir_syssearch -e \
'/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib /lib64 |' \
configure
# No!! No!!
sed -i.extra_R -e \
's|-R\$(libdir)||' \
hosts/*/Makefile.in
--
* Timestamp issue
- As said above, would you consider to use the following?
--
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
INSTALL="install -p" CPPROG="cp -p"
--
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #19 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-28 15:55:21 EDT --- Thanks! And yes, I forgot about timestamps; fixed in latest build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=790922 http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/web/google-gadgets.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-29 02:43:12 EDT --- Okay. -- This package (google-gadgets) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #21 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-29 11:35:07 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: google-gadgets Short Description: Google Gadgets for Linux Owners: salimma Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-30 17:02:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-30 21:40:41 EDT --- google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-gadgets-0.10.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-31 07:25:32 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 21:53:27 EDT --- google-gadgets-0.10.1-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/google-gadgets-0.10.1-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 450243] Review Request: google-gadgets - Google Gadgets for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450243 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-24 20:21:26 EDT --- google-gadgets-0.10.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
