[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-30 09:21 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: libibmad
Short Description: OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand MAD library
Owners: dledford
Branches: F-8 F-9
InitialCC:
Cvsextras Commits: yes


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-30 12:19 EST ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-29 09:33 EST ---
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-28 11:01 EST ---
Hi Doug, here's a quick review:

GOOD:
+ source matches upstream SHA1SUM:
1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104  libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz
1a2b36d0f309690ad660c9c1ff177f76c2484104  libibcommon-1.1.0.tar.gz.UP
+ license is correct and correctly included in the main package
+ specfile looks clean and macros sane
+ proper use of ldconfig
+ *.la files are removed
+ proper use of -devel and -static
+ has %clean
+ builds in mock F8 x86_64
+ rpmlint reports just two ignore-able warnings:
libibcommon-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libibcommon-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
+ dir ownership looks good
+ permissions look good

NEEDSWORK:
- according to the review guidelines, the spec must have:
rm -rf %{buildroot}
  or the equivalent at the start of %install section.
- Is the ExclusiveArch really necessary?  Could it just be deleted?
  I'm only asking because the review guidelines now include specific
  rules concerning ExcludeArch and, if the ExclusiveArch is removed,
  then I think the package will be fine wrt those guidelines.  Maybe
  a comment such as is known to work on arches ... but has not been
  tested on ... would be enough?



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-28 12:02 EST ---
Please ignore comment #1 above.

I'm trying to review the IB-related packages and I accidentally pasted 
the above comment into this bz entry.  My apologies!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-28 14:06 EST ---
Perhaps I can paste the correct review notes into the little Firefox text 
box this time.  Let's watch and see how it goes...


GOOD:
+ source matched upstream SHA1SUM:
743b35ca9257cf8f5f3d022df6161acc31301994  libibmad-1.2.0.tar.gz
743b35ca9257cf8f5f3d022df6161acc31301994  libibmad-1.2.0.tar.gz.UP
+ license is correct and correctly included
+ builds locally on F8 x86_64 w/ libibumad-devel installed
+ proper use of ldconfig
+ the *.la are deleted
+ permissions and dir ownership look good
+ rpmlint reports these two ignore-able warnings:
libibmad-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
libibmad-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation

NEEDSWORK:
- please remove the ExclusiveArch:
- please add rm -rf %{buildroot} or equivalent to the 
  beginning of %install


Yup, I think that was the one.  [*shakes head slowly and walks away*]


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-28 22:15 EST ---
Hehehe...%install fixed and exclusivearch removed ;-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 450483] libibmad package

2008-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: libibmad package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450483


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||450616
  nThis||




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review