[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #39 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-12-01 10:05:34 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 542990 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Comment #38 from Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de 2009-10-08 20:28:45 EDT --- I won't work much on this in the near future, because of the problems above… The one, who wants to continue can start within a new bug report. - Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |505154(FE-SCITECH) | Status Whiteboard|NotReady| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #37 from Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de 2009-07-29 15:54:49 EDT --- Continuing the mess ;-) I've started from scratch and completely deleted the fonts from root. When starting there is an error: Couldn't find font -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-*-*-10-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1, trying fixed. Please fix your system so helvetica can be found, this font typically is in the rpm (or pkg equivalent) package XFree86-[75,100]dpi-fonts or fonts-xorg-[75,100]dpi. /usr/bin/root.exe: error while loading shared libraries: libCore.so.5.24: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Installing of xorg-fonts-[75,100]dpi doesn't work... I paste here the the url of my actual spec and srpm, after all problems are resolved, I'll open a new review ticket to not confuse anyone as suggested in comment #36 from Jason. SPEC: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/fedora/root.spec SRPM: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/fedora/root-5.24.00-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-14 14:31:00 EDT --- This whole thing seems to be a mess. The original submitter seems to be long gone and whatever pacakges I can see don't seem to be ready for a review. I'm going to remove this package from the review queue, but you folks are welcome to keep this ticket open to work on the package. I would suggest opening a new review ticket when you have a package that's ready to be reviewed, so that the history in this ticket doesn't confuse anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #34 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk 2009-06-15 07:48:27 EDT --- The software does use fontconfig so the X side is OK AFAIK, the problem is in GL/postscript output. The major places that ttf files are requested directly that I can see are in: http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf2d/graf/src/TTF.cxx where freetype is used to load a font by path/name or number (MS with fallback to Free fonts). http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf3d/gl/src/TGLText.cxx where ftgl is used to load a font by fontnumber (table uses only MS fonts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #35 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk 2009-06-15 08:24:30 EDT --- sorry I was wrong root uses freetype but not fontconfig, so as I see it the plan should be * quick solution: point root to the DejaVu fonts and check that it still works OK * add fontconfig support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-06-13 04:31:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) 4) Not an issue, but I will mention it upfront. Upstream includes the MS TrueType fonts The licensing of those fonts does not comply with our guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Legal_considerations We basically require the same freedom to distribute and modify of our fonts than of our software. Also, even if they did, we'd ask to locate the font upstream and package it separately http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts Bundling fonts is prohibited. Fonts must be split out cleanly so they can be installed separately and reused by other packages Also, when a project relies on default fonts from another OS or Linux distribution, you have to ask yourself if the look, feel and metrics of those fonts is required before hunting for the closest substitute. If the software does not rely on some exact font characteristic, reconfiguring it to use Fedora default fonts instead is much preferred. The Liberation fonts are metrically-equivalent to some MS fonts. However they are *not* our default font, so forcing their use will make your application stand out in Fedora. Also they have a lot less Unicode coverage than Dejavu Fonts. GNU free fonts are not installed at all by default in Fedora and are not present on liveCDs and other physical distribution media. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F A lot of the symbols in symbol.ttf have long been attributed standard unicode values. If this software properly references those symbols by their unicode codepoint (and not the old legacy symbol-specific codepoint) any unicode font with coverage of the associated unicode blocks will work for you (DejaVu includes most common symbols). If this is not good enough for you, you can look at openoffice's opensymbol (and open a bug dejavu-side to request the missing symbol). Lastly, if you have all those problems, that's probably because this software does not use fontconfig. Fontconfig has been the default font management stack for many years on modern Unixes and anything using X. It will locate for you the most appropriate installed font transparently. Using something else is broken by design nowadays, and you'll have no end of font-related problems till the software is switched to use fontconfig (unlike under windows, the font complement varies from Unix to Unix and release to release, Unix font Unicode coverage is not and won't ever be exactly the same as windows fonts, etc). The only correct mid-term solution is getting this software ported to fontconfig, usually using a higher-level library like pango-cairo. (and if it manages PDFs is should probably take a look at poppler too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-12 07:33:20 EDT --- I emailed Christian Holm Christensen for changing some parts in the spec-file, in order it is alowed here in fedora… Just want to say, I am on it again ;-) The drafts I'm working on now are at: http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/cernroot/root.spec http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/cernroot/root_v5.22.00.source.tar.gz I hope over the weekend my part will be finished, and I'll wait for Christians answer. Can someone confirm * ROOT in Debian is a proof that there are no licensing issues ;-) from the last comment? The fonts should still NOT be allowed in fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #30 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk 2009-06-12 09:20:34 EDT --- Thomas this spec doesn't have any -devel -libs etc. subpackages, it doesn't even deal with the fonts really, it just removes them and adds a requires: root-ttf. For libAfterImage the version in f10 and in root are both 1.18 so I don't see an issue there. For the font side now, just removing the ms fonts last time I checked doesn't stop the X interface from working (freetype is used which deals with it) BUT the postscript output was broken since it needs the MS .ttf files. Looking at the code (graf2d/graf/src/TTF.cxx) it looks like the code also looks for free versions for some of the fonts (FreeMono.ttf, ...) so removing the MS ones and replacing them with the free ones should work. The liberation fonts probably provide a better solution so patching the code to add them is a also good idea. Not sure where we can get symbol.ttf though. I'll try to find someone from the Fonts SIG to have a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-12 10:41:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) Thomas this spec doesn't have any -devel -libs etc. subpackages, it doesn't even deal with the fonts really, it just removes them and adds a requires: root-ttf. Yes, atm I try to compile with the .spec file provided by the root developer themselves. I'll talk with them to add -devel and so on for unity purpos. Right now 5.22 and 5.23 won't compile, maybe because of gcc 4.4, they don't seem to use it… As already mentioned, I'm new to packaging. It will probably take the weekend till I have usefull results and will notice you here again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-12 13:06:16 EDT --- ATM I have some troubles to compile even with the original .spec. It does not make any sence to continue now, till I get answer from the root devels. Is there anyone else working on this? Maybe we can stick together. Kostas? Here is the bug I opened upstream https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=51747 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-11 09:04:21 EDT --- I'm not yet that familiar with creating SPECs, but am free to help this getting packaged. Juanucleus patch is needed, in order the true type fonts to replace, because they are not allowed to get shipped in fedora… That's probably the main reason nothing is habbening here ;-) Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #28 from Suvayu fatkasuv...@gmail.com 2009-06-11 23:33:09 EDT --- Hi, I have been following this bug but I have no experience in packaging. So I posted to the project mailing list. The developers replied back about some of the issues discussed here (e.g. CINT). They also mentioned they will be able to help if someone takes this up with the developer team at root...@root.cern.ch or on their bug-tracker at https://savannah.cern.ch/projects/savroot/ . I am quoting the email below. Maybe this will help someone. - Suvayu *** quote begins *** Hi Suvayu, a few commentes: * CINT needs the include files in cint/cint/include at runtime. They are not build time include files (those are in cint/cint/inc) - think of them as something to be put in /usr/share/root. * ROOT does not use the stand-alone CINT binary; we split them intentionally also to allow package maintainers to produce CINT and ROOT packages without overlap. * ROOT is part of Debian, so you might want to contact them for the design they used. They managed to create ROOT modules like this (output from apt-get install root-tab, so some might be bogus): root-db-clientroot-plugin-glroot-plugin-netx root-plugin-ruby root-system-bin root-file-server root-plugin-hbook root-plugin-odbc root-plugin-sql root-system-common root-fitter root-plugin-krb5 root-plugin-peac root-plugin-tmva root-system-doc root-glviewer root-plugin-ldap root-plugin-pgsql root-plugin-unuranroot-system-proofd root-plugin-asimage root-plugin-mathmore root-plugin-proof root-plugin-xml root-system-rootd root-plugin-clarens root-plugin-minuitroot-plugin-python root-plugin-xproofroot-system-xrootd root-plugin-eve root-plugin-minuit2 root-plugin-qt root-proofd root-tail root-plugin-fftw3 root-plugin-mlp root-plugin-quadproot-ttf root-plugin-fumiliroot-plugin-mysql root-plugin-roofit root-system * ROOT in Debian is a proof that there are no licensing issues ;-) * You won't have fun with your build result if you use the fedora default libAfterImage. We use the bleeding edge one all the time, basically because we are one of its main drivers for development. You have been warned :-) * Christian Holm Christensen ch...@nbi.dk is our packaging guru, as you were probably able to tell looking at $ROOTSYS/build/package/rpm/spec.in. Cheers, Axel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #26 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-06-10 16:55:43 EDT --- May I ask: Who is working on this package? juanucleus? Joseph? Kostas? Thomas? Jochen? I have a feeling that everybody is waiting for someone to step forward. If anyone points to a SPEC file that we can proceed from, I'd be grateful. There are a few SPEC files posted above but I don't know who want(s) to be the maintainer(s). Please don't be afraid to raise your hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #25 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-25 22:40:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) The root configure file lists these globus libraries: globuslibs=libglobus_gss_assist_$flavour libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour libglobus_gsi_credential_$flavour libglobus_common_$flavour libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour libglobus_proxy_ssl_$flavour libglobus_gsi_sysconfig_$flavour libglobus_openssl_error_$flavour libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour libglobus_oldgaa_$flavour libglobus_gsi_cert_utils_$flavour libglobus_openssl_$flavour libglobus_gsi_proxy_core_$flavour libglobus_callout_$flavour libltdl_$flavour libssl_$flavour libcrypto_$flavour libglobus_gss_assist bug #467239 libglobus_gssapi_gsi bug #467237 libglobus_gsi_credential bug #453861 libglobus_common bug #453851 libglobus_gsi_callback, libglobus_oldgaa bug #453858 libglobus_proxy_ssl bug #453854 libglobus_gsi_sysconfig bug #453857 libglobus_openssl_error bug #453853 libglobus_gsi_cert_utils bug #453856 libglobus_openssl bug #453855 libglobus_gsi_proxy_core bug #453862 libglobus_callout bug #467235 libltdl bug #453849 (GPT wrapper for the system version) libssl, libcrypto bug #453850 (GPT wrapper for the system version) The configure script also looks for the grid-proxy-init binary - this is available in bug #453865 All done!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 19:32:15 EDT --- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21
13:22:35 EDT ---
Hi,
I just asked on fedora-legal-list about the licence of the fonts within root:
It's not a 'Good Licence', so possibly there is no chance of a positive
review!!!
It could be a solution, if we use the X11 Rendering and not the truetypes.
In scientificlinux this package is called 'cernroot'. I like this name, because
there is also a cernlibs package in fedora. Consider a rename ;-)
I have tried to build my on root.spec with much more enabled features, but am
not yet ready to publish it. I'll do so, if it's finished…
ATM %dir %{_datadir}/root/fonts does not work as a result of the bad licence…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21 14:12:23 EDT --- I'm giving up for now... This is my fist try to create a .spec. Earlier, I had anything in one package, and installing and running worked. Now to fullfil the guidelines, I had tried to create a -devel package, too. This spec is not working anymore, but maybe you can get some usefull parts of it... http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/fedora/root.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #21 from juanucl...@gmail.com juanucl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 14:40:42 EDT --- Hi, So true type fonts are not allowed at all, or just not the MS ones? At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. Is this not an option, according to the legal team? --Juan Carlos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21 16:25:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) So true type fonts are not allowed at all, or just not the MS ones? The MS ones have a 'Bad Licence'. They are not allowd, any other true type fonts with a 'Good Licence' should be allowd. At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. perfect ;-) Is this not an option, according to the legal team? I did't tell them the context, only asked if the MS licence in the folder of the fonts is a 'Good Licence' - No. After removing them, anything else should be allowed (- completely GPLv2 AFAIK) Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #23 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 18:23:50 EDT --- At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. Do you still have the patch to do this? This, and building on F11 with the gcc-4.4 compilers is what's holding me up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se --- Comment #18 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-19 15:46:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) There are many dependencies that are not in fedora (like pythia, castor, globus...) some of which may be free software other aren't. There are several globus packages currently submitted for review. You might want to review some of them to get your dependencies satisfied: bug #453850, bug #453851, bug #453853, bug #453854, bug #453855, bug #453856, bug #453857, bug #453858, bug #453861, bug #453862, bug #453865, bug #467235, bug #467237, bug #467239, bug #478917, bug #478918, bug #478919, bug #478920, bug #478921, bug #478922, bug #478923, bug #478925, bug #478926, bug #478927, bug #478928, bug #478929, bug #478930, bug #478931 The root configure file lists these globus libraries: globuslibs=libglobus_gss_assist_$flavour libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour libglobus_gsi_credential_$flavour libglobus_common_$flavour libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour libglobus_proxy_ssl_$flavour libglobus_gsi_sysconfig_$flavour libglobus_openssl_error_$flavour libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour libglobus_oldgaa_$flavour libglobus_gsi_cert_utils_$flavour libglobus_openssl_$flavour libglobus_gsi_proxy_core_$flavour libglobus_callout_$flavour libltdl_$flavour libssl_$flavour libcrypto_$flavour libglobus_gss_assist bug #467239 libglobus_gssapi_gsi bug #467237 libglobus_gsi_credential bug #453861 libglobus_common bug #453851 libglobus_gsi_callback, libglobus_globus_oldgaa bug #453858 libglobus_proxy_ssl bug #453854 libglobus_gsi_sysconfig bug #453857 libglobus_openssl_error bug #453853 libglobus_gsi_cert_utils bug #453856 libglobus_openssl bug #453855 libglobus_gsi_proxy_core bug #453862 libglobus_callout bug #467235 libltdl bug #453849 (GPT wrapper for the system version - already approved) libssl, libcrypto bug #453850 (GPT wrapper for the system version) The configure script also looks for the grid-proxy-init binary - this is available in bug #453865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-03-09 11:41:12 EDT --- I a a look to the package and find out that the build doesn't honor the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. In additional, if the main package need the .h and .so files from the devel subpackage then there is no need to create a seperate devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-03-09 11:45:58 EDT --- After I have got a rpmls to the main package, I have found a lot of files in /etc/root which sould be better place into /usr/share/root. And as last the main package contains fonts files, which is not allow by the packaging guideline. Fonts has to been placed in separates fonts subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no
--- Comment #15 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-03-08 15:43:35
EDT ---
Some comments (some of these are not new, see comment #3 and #6)
add smp flags to make (the build is slow anyway), use optflags -
replace with:
make %{?_smp_mflags}
with
make %{?_smp_mflags} OPTFLAGS=%{optflags}
A build in koji in rawhide (F11) fails with:
/etc/profile.d/qt.sh: No such file or directory
I guess this is because qt is now qt4 while /etc/profile.d/qt.sh is
in the qt3-devel package.
A F10 koji was successfull, however ppc64 failed for some reason:
(that was with the make changes).
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1230019
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #12 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk 2009-02-16 10:51:18 EDT --- Here is the one that I used http://georgiou.fedorapeople.org/tmp/root.spec not perfect but it does build a usable 5.22 root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-02-16 13:19:24 EDT --- Thanks a lot for that .spec file. I will go back to work and try to clean everything up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt jsm...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt jsm...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #14 from Joseph Smidt jsm...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-16 21:17:02 EDT --- Request for comment: I know this package is not ready to receive a thorough review yet, but it has basics covered: builds, installs, etc with exit 0, no rpmlint issues with the .spec, src and debug files. It has been modularized, borrowing largely from Kostas above with -devel, -libs, etc packages. However, as I am still new at packaging, I really could use some helpful feedback at this point. Here are the needed files: Spec: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root.spec Srpm: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.src.rpm On known issue is the man package depends on the -devel package. I don't know any way around this since unversioned libraries and .h files are needed for root to run properly. I will start looking into all these issues, but thought I would make a request for comment while I am going about it. Thanks a lot! Here are the outputs: rpmlint root.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- rpmlint root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- rpmlint root-debuginfo-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - rpmlint root-xrootd-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- rpmlint root-libs-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm root-libs.i386: W: no-documentation root-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/root-i386.conf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- (grepping to suppress, for now, hundreds of warnings!) root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E:root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/ROOT.py root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_listtree.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/header.html root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_text.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/ROOT.css root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/thisroot.csh root.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/thisroot.csh 0644 root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/HELP.html root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_canvas.1.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/ROOT.js root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/thisroot.sh root.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/thisroot.sh 0644 root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/footer.html root.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib -- root-cint-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E: root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/win32api/make.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/include/makehpib root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/try.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/cintocx/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/pthread/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/gl/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/Makefile root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/longlong/make.bat root-cint.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/cintocx/Cint-Ocx root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/wildc.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/qt/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/WildCard/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/dll_stl/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/stl/_climits root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/WildCard/ARCHIVE 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/include/matrixstream.hi root-cint.i386: E: devel-dependency root-devel rpmlint root-docs-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E: root-docs.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/root-5.22.00/tutorials/gui/mditestbg.xpm root-docs.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/root-5.22.00/tutorials/image/mditestbg.xpm -
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-02-15 15:09:01 EDT --- Hello, Just as an update, I have been trying to package 5.22.00. since that is the latest stable version. The problem has been I can't get it to build. I have borrowed from Juan's .spec above. I will be borrowing more once I see what new files, etc... are installed with the new release. If anyone has a suggestion how I can get this to build, I will be grateful: Spec: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/ROOT.spec Source: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root_v5.22.00.source.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #10 from Kostas Georgiou k.georg...@imperial.ac.uk 2009-02-12 08:12:24 EDT --- I have a spec file that I use locally (we are an HEP group) but it's by no means ready to be included in fedora. From what I remember some of the problems are: * The M$ fonts have to go, we need to find suitable replacements and patch the code * Licesing could be an issue with other parts of root beyond the fonts, getting some advice from the legal team is probably a good idea * Some libraries are unversioned (xrootd, proofd. If I remember correctly) * Most of the servers use no authentication in their default setup so the configs need to be changed to default to some strong authentication, people shouldn't end up exporting their homes without authentication just because they started a service. * I've been packaging cint (the c++ interpreter) on it's own subpackage since it can be usefull outside of root, the latest version of root doesn't build the binary anymore though and it looks like upstream is starting to use cint on it's own (http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint). It might be worthwhile to check if root can use the external cint to avoid code duplication. * find a solution for libafterimage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-31 01:07:31 EDT --- Joseph, please go ahead. If the initial submitter returns, you guys can cooperate in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephsm...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-01-01 13:24:01 EDT --- Hello, is there still interest in packaging root? If so great! If not I would be willing to continue the packaging process for root. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 18:07:30 EDT
---
Also, how do I add the fedora flags?
Replacing
make %{?_smp_mflags}
with
make %{?_smp_mflags} OPTFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS
should do the trick. To understand why, just open the Makefile and search for
OPTFLAGS.
How is this package coming? I am curious about it.
I didn't understand your question about unrar, can you explain?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 18:22:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I don't have a new package to submit yet, but I do have some comments and questions. Patrice: The only apparent difference between root and root.exe seems to be that root displays a splash screen and then calls root.exe. Ok. I had originally not included the cernlib requirement because I thought cernlib was not being developed anymore. At least, the last release seems to have been in 2006. Maybe the root people will update minicern more often then cernlib will get updated. From my personal preference I'd prefer minicern, but if the Fedora standards require cernlib-utils to be used, I guess I'll make those changes. Indeed, cernlib is dead upstream, but I still maintain it in fedora. You are right that minicern may be updated more often, but it has very little coverage compared with cernlib. The fedora policy is to use only one library to fix bugs everywhere, but minicern is small and a fork, so it is not obvious what to do. I'd say that as an exception minicern can be used in root. If there are other advices it'd be better. I thought unrar was only part of livna. Is this up for inclusion in F10? There is an unrar in fedora, but that cannot do all that the livna one can do. Also, how do I add the fedora flags? Should I patch the Makefile to include them, or is there a different method to include this into the spec file. The packaging guidelines are not very clear on this matter. They cannot be clear, since it depends on the package. It may be as simple as using %configure or very complicated, depending on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||root -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-04 14:26:52 EDT --- Hi Patrice and Axel, Sorry for the long absence, but only a few days after submitting this for review my laptop died, and had to reformat my desktop to RedHat 5 as per our labs standards. But in any case, I now have a laptop again, and am returning to packaging root. I don't have a new package to submit yet, but I do have some comments and questions. Patrice: The only apparent difference between root and root.exe seems to be that root displays a splash screen and then calls root.exe. I had originally not included the cernlib requirement because I thought cernlib was not being developed anymore. At least, the last release seems to have been in 2006. Maybe the root people will update minicern more often then cernlib will get updated. From my personal preference I'd prefer minicern, but if the Fedora standards require cernlib-utils to be used, I guess I'll make those changes. I thought unrar was only part of livna. Is this up for inclusion in F10? Also, how do I add the fedora flags? Should I patch the Makefile to include them, or is there a different method to include this into the spec file. The packaging guidelines are not very clear on this matter. I will be uploading a new package shortly, as soon as I address the issues that Patrice brought up. I'll be using 5.20.00 as it's been released already. There is a new development version in the works, but won't be released until December 18, so I've made not attempts to update to that. --Juan Carlos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:42 EST --- Juan Patrice, thanks for picking this up! It already looks quite good (submission and review). Wrt the name: don't change it please, the HEP community is very familiar with the root name. Patrice, if we identify the non-free dependencies, maybe we can contact upstreams and make them adapt their licensing like it happened for ARPACK. It's is very slow (so this review should not wait for them), but it seems to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 05:36 EST --- Missing buildRequires, at least: libGL-devel libGLU-devel postgresql-devel mysql-devel krb5-devel fftw-devel python-devel qt4-devel ftgl-devel gcc-gfortran python-devel Some may not really needed because they are in turn dependencies of other BuildRequires. The internal libAfterImage is used, there is this: WARNING: System libAfterImage is too new, using built-in this should be fixed. A libafterimage library is shipped which is clearly wrong. Also there is a minicern library, instead the system cern library, in cernlib-utils should be used. Then the 2 apps depending on the cernlib could be in a separate package. It would be nice if you could remove the in-source 3rd party library directories before doing the build, to be sure that they are not used. There are 2 files installed not packaged: /usr/bin/g2root /usr/bin/h2root The libraries should have a soname, you should add --enable-soversion Currently the programs don't start because the shared libraries are not found by the dynamic loader. To correct that you should add a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d The fedora build flags are not used. Some binary names are too generic in my opinion, namely: root, roots, genmap, xrd How is the python ROOT module used? Shouldn't it be in the python directories? And similar with genreflex. And there is also a /usr/lib/root/writer.py which looks dubious. How is it used? In any case it should certainly be below %_datadir (or in the python dirs). A separate package should be done for the (x)emacs stuff, there are guidelines for that. Many files and directories that are in %_sysconfdir doesn't look like configuration, like /etc/root/html/ /etc/root/RadioNuclides.txt /etc/root/gdb-backtrace.sh /etc/root/valgrind-root.supp /etc/root/root.mimes /etc/root/proof/ Most should certainly be in %_datadir Is /etc/root/vmc/ really needed? If needed it certainly should be in %_datadir and in -devel. Are the files in /usr/share/root/plugins/ used at runtime? (they are in root-devel) According to the doc, it seems that the files in /etc/profile.d are not needed. root-config may also be useful at runtime to have programs find the paths/arch, at least it is used in root.sh (though it is not useful for linux). I am not sure that the root icons should be in /usr/share/icons/ this directory is for icon themes conforming with freedesktop. It should certainly better be in /usr/share/root/icons At least a .desktop file is missing for root, and maybe more. What is the difference between root and root.exe? in the root.mime file, external applications should use xdg-open. Because of the loader issue above I cannot test, but I'd like to have an example showing when the cint header files are needed. In the init.d files, you should remove references to environment variables. in the xrootd there is a @libdir@, but in fact all that relates to LD_LIBRARY_PATH should be removed. Also there should be example /etc/sysconfig/*d to show even in a very sketchy way what can go in these files. It even seems to me than some variales should be mandatorily set in these sysconfig files, like XRDUSER. Corresponding users should be created, there is a related guideline for user and group creation. Looks like there are many things done in /tmp, it would be nice to be sure that what is done here is always done with unpredictable names, to avoid the race in tmp security issue. There are many dependencies that are not in fedora (like pythia, castor, globus...) some of which may be free software other aren't. In general I insist on having all the free software dependencies in fedora, but in that case this means really too much. There is one dep already in fedora, unuran, you could try to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 09:03 EST --- I get this on $ rpm -Uvh ~/tmp/root-5.19.04-1.fc9.src.rpm 1:root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/dumas/RPM-fc/SOURCES/root_v5.19.04-clean.source.tar.gz;485906b9: cpio: read And rpm2cpio | cpio -i also fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-18 12:13 EST --- Patrice: My apologies for this, I do not know what the issue was. I changed the name of the source file to prevent the use of a dash and this seems to have done the trick. These are the new spec and source files: Spec URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/r2/root.spec SRPM URL: http://www.jlab.org/~cornejo/fedora/root/r2/root-5.19.04-2.fc9.src.rpm By the way, this is for all. There is also a good API documentation available, which I have not yet packed because of the exceedingly large size. It's something like 200+ MB. Should I attempt to pack this, or just point people to the appropriate on-line source? Also, right now I am packaging the development branch, but that's because the production version (5.20.00) should be out on the 25th of this month. Thank you all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
