[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-07 19:51:29 EDT --- prover9-200805a-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 05:31:12 EDT --- prover9-200805a-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 06:18:57 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Comment #18 from Tim Colles [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 10:16:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: prover9 Short Description: Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator Owners: tcolles Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: tcolles Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 14:45:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 09:32 EST --- Hi. I confirm that I am requesting sponsorship. My FAS name is tcolles. Note that on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join; it says that you need to apply to the cvsextras group which no longer seems to exist (the page also has a broken link to that group). It looks to me like it should now be the packager group, and that is the one I have applied for, perhaps the web page could be updated (if I am correct). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 10:22 EST --- Yes, cvsextras is renamed to packager. By the way on FAS your email address information is lacking. Would you update your FAS information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 10:32 EST --- It is there. Maybe because the account was marked private? Anyhow I have unchecked that option to see if it makes any difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 10:43 EST --- Okay, confirmed. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-25 09:28 EST --- Hi. Have pre-reviewed a couple of random submissions. They are #456038 and #454482. I am also still working on making one of my own packages compliant, it is in for review (#428435) but I need to make some changes to the source to make it acceptable - will be getting back to this one in a short while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-25 14:56 EST --- Okay. + I already said that this package itself is okay + Your pre-review is good for initial comments. -- This package (prove9) is APPROVED by me -- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 08:52 EST --- Hi. Was on holiday last week :) Will get going with a pre-review and hopefully another review request this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-18 11:18 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 12:15 EST --- Okay, this package itself seems good now. So I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 09:11 EST --- Thanks for testing the package. The new release at: Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9-200805a-4.src.rpm explicitly excludes ppc64 architecture with a suitable comment. Unfortunately I don't have access to a ppc64 machine to test/debug this architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 13:36 EST --- I will check your latest srpm later. By the way: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 11:56 EST --- Thanks for the additional comments. The new release at: Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9-200805a-3.src.rpm fixes all these: * Namespace issue Binaries all now have a prover9- prefix (except mace4/prover9) and are back in /usr/bin. Man pages have been similarly renamed. This seems to be a cleaner way to do this (eg. like git package) than a sub-directory. Dropped most of the man page symlinks as not really necessary. * Documents This was a hangover from the previous version which created dynamic libs. Changed the dependency order so prover9-apps now requires prover9 instead of the other way around - this is then consistent with all the other sub-packages. * rpmlint issue Both permissions have been fixed and everything is now completely clean under rpmlint. * test Added a %check section to do all the tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 13:36 EST --- Test fails only on ppc64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=703026 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=703051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 14:09 EST --- For 200805a-2: * Namespace issue - Please fix for too generic names on man pages, too. (by the way, is it really needed to create all symlinks for man pages, too?) * Documents - prove9-apps subpackage can be installed without prove9 package. In such case, documents like COPYING and so are not installed, which is wrong. At least some files should be moved to prove9-apps subpackage. * rpmlint issue: prover9-apps.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/prover9-apps-200805a/apps.examples/run-all prover9-apps.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/prover9-apps-200805a/apps.examples/run-all /bin/csh prover9-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib/libladr.a - run-all script has executable permission bits and this adds unneeded Requires (/bin/csh) to -apps subpackage. Please fix the permission to 0644. - Static archives should have 0644 permission. * test - build.log shows 284 /bin/cp -p utilities/* bin 285 Now try 'make test1'. Would you consider to add %check section and do some tests there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-04 06:04 EST ---
Thanks for looking at this Mamoru. The new release at:
Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9.spec
SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/prover9/prover9-200805a-2.src.rpm
fixes all these:
* About prover9-libtoolise.patch
This patch has been dropped and the static library added to -devel (which
also provides a virtual -static).
* Compilation flags
This has been corrected - gcc is now called with %{optflags}
* Timestamps
The -p option has been added to all %__install and %__cp commands.
* Unneeded ldconfig call
All %post/%postun scriptlets have been dropped
* Too generic names
All binaries except mace4 and prover9 are now in /usr/lib/prover9/bin.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 12:40 EST --- *** Bug 428410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 14:01 EST --- Some random comments on 200805a-1: * About prover9-libtoolise.patch - This patch seems to be for providing shared library named libladr.so.4. However if the original tarball does not provide any shared library by default, this way is dangerous because we cannot guess with what soversion the upstream developer comes to provide shared library in the future. At this stage the number 4:0:0 can be chosen arbitrarily without any ground. See also the explanation by Patrice Dumas: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PatriceDumas So if this package only provides static archives by default, please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries of static libraries only. * Compilation flags - This package completely ignores Fedora specific compilation flags: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags You can check what flags must be passed by $ rpm --eval %optflags This also reads to creating non-useful debuginfo rpm. * Timestamps - When using %__install or %__cp commands, add -p option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Unneeded ldconfig call - This -devel package does not need to call /sbin/ldconfig on scriptlets. * Too generic names - Again filenames like attack or renamer, rewriter, etc... are too generic for files to be installed under %_bindir. Also it may be that the names isofilter? are also dangerous, as my system already has iso-info or isoinfo () or isosize or so. Would you rename these binaries to prover9-??? or move these under %_libdir/%name , for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451996] Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prover9 - Thereom Prover and Countermodel Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
