[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-26 02:11 EST --- tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-26 09:52 EST --- As you can see, this package has been pushed to stable on Fedora 9, and it will be in F-10. I have fixed the packaging documentation to note that import automatically does make tag, and that you need to do cvs up after an import. I still think that the cvs up should be part of the import, but as long as it's documented it's a trivial inconvenient extra step. What causes trouble is when key steps are undocumented :-(. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-15 08:22 EST --- tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||0-0.20070911.3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 17:40 EST --- tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 17:48 EST --- As you can see, I've submitted it. The big problem seems to be that the submission docs are out-of-sync with the scripts. make tag seems to be no longer necessary; tagging is part of the import. HOWEVER, the importing does _NOT_ update the local copy, which is weird. You have to do cvs update after the import. (You can tell this is necessary, because after the import, when you do cvs update you actually get updated files... a truly weird result) So, instead of: cd F-9/ make tag make build You need to do: cd F-9/ cvs up make build That is bizarre; cvs up should be part of the import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 03:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #34) Bad news - I'm having trouble with the weird Fedora-unique CVS build process, and can't get my SRPM in. Any suggestions? I had a package just accepted so I could try to reproduce, but it works for me. This at least gave the APPEARANCE of working correctly, though I'm not sure if I was supposed to do separate imports for default and F-9. But that's where the docs led me to go, and it didn't complain. Yes, you are supposed to do separate imports. Then I tried to do the following, where it seemed to hang: cd F-9/ make tag make build A possibility is that you didn't run cvs co prior from make tag, make build, and so the imports are not reflected in your working copy. After both make tag and make build, it hung after giving these error messages: rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query In fact, even make help when my current directory was the F-9 subdirectory produced those error messages, instead of something useful. The documentation on the interaction with Fedora CVS could at best be labelled needs work :-(. The fedora docs are always in a needs work state since the build system, the auth system, the wiki... are always in a state of permanent change (with improvements most of the time, and sometime usability regressions but I don't think it is the case now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 12:53 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 22:33 EST --- Good news - I have CVS access. Bad news - I'm having trouble with the weird Fedora-unique CVS build process, and can't get my SRPM in. Any suggestions? I got set up using: ssh-add mkdir ~/cvs cd ~/cvs fedora-cvs tex-zfuzz cd tex-zfuzz All of that seemed to work fine. I did: ./common/cvs-import.sh ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.2.fc9.src.rpm ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-9 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.2.fc9.src.rpm This at least gave the APPEARANCE of working correctly, though I'm not sure if I was supposed to do separate imports for default and F-9. But that's where the docs led me to go, and it didn't complain. Then I tried to do the following, where it seemed to hang: cd F-9/ make tag make build After both make tag and make build, it hung after giving these error messages: rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query In fact, even make help when my current directory was the F-9 subdirectory produced those error messages, instead of something useful. The documentation on the interaction with Fedora CVS could at best be labelled needs work :-(. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 17:09 EST --- (In reply to comment #30) Here's the package, same as the old one except that I redid the version/release numbering as noted above. Also, I shortened the ChangeLog considerably; I doubt anyone wants great detail about what happened before it entered the repository. I prefer to have the full changelog, it also documents what was taken care of during the review. I won't make it a blocker, though. I reset the release number to 1; this release number format is completely different (and incompatible) from the previous ones anyway, so we may as well start fresh at 1. Agreed. SRPM and .spec file at: http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec rpmlint is clean on .spec, binary i386 RPM, _and_ SRPM. koji build --scratch dist-f9 is clean on all 5 architectures. Did I misunderstand anything? Or see anything else that needs doing? I have sponsored you. Just proceed with the cvs request. I already have approved the package by setting fedora-review to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 23:00 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tex-zfuzz Short Description: Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language Owners: dwheeler Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: pertusus Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: zfuzz - Z |Review Request: tex-zfuzz - |fuzz - Type-checker and |Type-checker and LaTeX style |LaTeX style for Z spec |for Z spec language |language| Flag||fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 14:35 EST --- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * free software, license included. * match upstream 4e4d00d8571b14919f95f041a927f71b fuzzman-2up.pdf e3eb1467804bf4bf5b8dcf8eed773c69 fuzzman.pdf c3145cea9c6f16fb02e068fd1ea669a9 refcard-2up.pdf 082297daa993c97d8e35fb75f8bb2810 refcard-3up.pdf be69ba14a3b997bcde65828a34909e67 refcard.pdf 9f021c0e68f8f4616095f57ff2192c6f fuzz-2007-09-11.tar.gz * %files section right APPROVED Did you apply to sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 17:50 EST --- Did you apply to sponsorship? Not sure what you mean. I used the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug in bugzilla, and applied to the cvsextras group on the Fedora accounts system (which seems to know I don't have a sponsor). Do I need to do something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 18:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) and applied to the cvsextras group on the Fedora accounts system (which seems to know I don't have a sponsor). That's what I meant. What is your account name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 23:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) My account name is dwheeler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452559] Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-zfuzz - Type-checker and LaTeX style for Z spec language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452559 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 00:23 EST --- Here's the package, same as the old one except that I redid the version/release numbering as noted above. Also, I shortened the ChangeLog considerably; I doubt anyone wants great detail about what happened before it entered the repository. I reset the release number to 1; this release number format is completely different (and incompatible) from the previous ones anyway, so we may as well start fresh at 1. SRPM and .spec file at: http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz-0-0.20070911.1.fc9.src.rpm http://www.dwheeler.com/tex-zfuzz.spec rpmlint is clean on .spec, binary i386 RPM, _and_ SRPM. koji build --scratch dist-f9 is clean on all 5 architectures. Did I misunderstand anything? Or see anything else that needs doing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
