[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-13 19:12 EST --- Jesse, are you still interested in adding this to Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-14 11:18 EST --- Yes, sorry I've been distracted with some other work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-28 11:21 EST --- Ack, just realized that the files in this conflict with the 'js' package. Need to investigate this more, because it seems jscoverage includes it's own version of js. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 11:50 EST --- Grr. Well, Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/jscoverage-0.3.2-0.1.rc1.fc9.src.rpm have been updated after talking some with upstream. They don't install the js stuff anymore, but it was noticed that jscoverage statically links against the js that's built during the build process. I've asked upstream to help me work up a configure option that has it dynamically link against the system js, we'll see where that goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 14:51 EST --- message from upstream (that I will later put in the spec file itself): From: Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re: Packaging jscoverage for Fedora Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:01:38 -0500 (13:01 EDT) Jesse Keating wrote: > Hrm, that exposes a different problem. Fedora has a pretty strict > policy with regard to statically compiled software, in that you have to > have a really really good reason to bring it in and have the exception > on file. Are there any ways to compile jscoverage against the shared js > library? > The Mozilla SpiderMonkey js library is intended to be used as a JavaScript interpreter, but JSCoverage uses it for parsing, rather than interpreting, JavaScript. Unfortunately the parsing functions are not "public" and could possibly change any time the library is upgraded. I think the above qualifies as a good reason to allow static linking. I'm ready to have this package reviewed. The only current rpmlint output is a number of .css files in the examples have dos line endings, which doesn't effect their use. If not necessary I'd rather not munge those files during package build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for
JavaScript programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 17:23 EST ---
There's more than just css files in doc; I don't know why license files are
buried down in there, but who knows. Anyway, one line fixes everything up:
find doc -type f -exec sed -i 's/\r//' {} \;
There's a test suite in the tarball; it runs fine with:
%check
cd tests
make check
The documentation is a bit over half the package. The whole thing is only a bit
over a megabyte so I wouldn't really worry about it, though if this becomes a
dependency of many other packages I'd consider splitting it to a subpackage.
I need to run now, but that really looks to be about all there is to say.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453264] Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscoverage - A tool that measures code coverage for JavaScript programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453264 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 21:17 EST --- MD5Sum: 8e06fb1d7fdc06b02f5e79093908157e jscoverage-0.3.2rc1.tar.bz2 Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Valid license tag * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Package installs and uninstalls clean Bad (non-blockers): * As tibbs noted in comment #4, there is a test suite in the tarball that might might be worth running. * The devel subpackage bits can probably be dropped, since your not packaging anything for it. * rpmlint produces the following errors that should be fixed before importing into CVS: jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/licenses/gpl-2.txt jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/app/xbDebug.js jscoverage.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/jscoverage-0.3.2/doc/example-jsunit/jsunit/app/css/readme +1 APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
