[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2009-08-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507


Christopher Curran ccur...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ccur...@redhat.com




--- Comment #7 from Christopher Curran ccur...@redhat.com  2009-08-13 
03:10:04 EDT ---
IANAL but given the various interpretations of good and evil I think this is
not an issue. All we need is to find an appropriate thesis which shows good and
evil do not exist or that good and evil are overlapping variables. If good can
be evil in context and the equivalent event evil not good then there is no
problem as the license negates itself. I say that it is moral to accept his
software as sufficiently free and save discussions of morality for the pub,
where real philosophy occurs.

Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2009-08-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507





--- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com  2009-08-13 
10:10:06 EDT ---
Red Hat Legal (who are lawyers) disagree.

Its a bad license, with unenforceable clauses.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-09-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507


Dave Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution||CANTFIX




--- Comment #6 from Dave Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-03 14:01:03 EDT 
---
Unfortunately, the author is unwilling to change the license text, so I'm going
to have to close this one as can't fix

Thanks to everyone for your help, in any case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-09-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507





--- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-02 10:59:00 EDT 
---
I can approach upstream, but what is the exact problem here; are you
interpreting the clause as a limitation against a field of endeavor?  Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-09-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507


Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-02 
12:22:36 EDT ---
Basically, the concern is that shall be used for good, not evil constitutes a
use restriction. Not only that, it is a vague use restriction, where the
definitions of good and evil are not defined in the terms of the license.

Upstream needs to take one of the following actions for this to be okay for
Fedora (in order of preference):

1. Drop that line entirely.
2. No, really. Drop that line entirely. Licenses are not the appropriate place
for such joke text.
3. Change the line to read something like The software should be used for
Good, not Evil. This makes it a suggestion, not a use-restriction.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-09-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507





--- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-02 12:46:30 EDT 
---
Thanks; I've emailed the author asking for the text to be removed/changed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-09-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507


Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-09-02 
00:41:33 EDT ---
I had a package with a file licensed with the same Good, not Evil clause. 
Although it's something of a joke, the clause does render the license non-Free
in the free software sense.  If the license text can be relaxed slightly to be
non-binding then it would be okay.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier

2008-08-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507


Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||182235




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-10 16:29:13 EDT 
---
I don't know if the issue of the weird license was ever resolved on-list;
blocking FE-Legal to hopefully get a clear statement in this ticket.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review