[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 20:03:05 EDT --- nes_ntsc-0.2.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 20:23:55 EDT --- nes_ntsc-0.2.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-12 08:45:50 EDT --- nes_ntsc-0.2.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nes_ntsc-0.2.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #6 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:07:37 EDT --- Excellent, thanks Hans. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nes_ntsc Short Description: Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #7 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:21:57 EDT --- One further question: when a reference spec is used as the basis for a Fedora spec, is there a preference on keeping the original changelog entries ? I see value in acknowledging previous contributors and issues that occurred in getting the spec to it's pre-fedora state. On the other hand, is it allowed to include those old changelog entries ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:35:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) One further question: when a reference spec is used as the basis for a Fedora spec, is there a preference on keeping the original changelog entries ? I see value in acknowledging previous contributors and issues that occurred in getting the spec to it's pre-fedora state. On the other hand, is it allowed to include those old changelog entries ? It is fine to keep the original entries. For example, I kept the old entries from hatari when I migrated it from Dribble to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 04:59:01 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-10 04:13:21 EDT --- Full review done, no problems found: Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #2 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 10:12:06 EDT --- I plan on up/packaging upstreams other *_ntsc libs. The author mentions the latest release include a source cleanup and refactoring, so that some files are now identical between the 3x *_ntsc sources. Would it be acceptable/worth the effort to create a single libntsc package, that includes all three upstream source packages, with sub packages for -nes, -snes, -sms ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #1 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 10:11:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313566) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313566) diff between original dribble spec0.2.0 and this spec. I request some assistance regarding lib sonames. This library has previously been packaged and used by out of Fedora repo applications as libnes_ntsc.so.0.2.0 Have I gone about the soname change in an effective way ? Should I keep the original 0.2.0 soname instead ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 11:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I plan on up/packaging upstreams other *_ntsc libs. The author mentions the latest release include a source cleanup and refactoring, so that some files are now identical between the 3x *_ntsc sources. Would it be acceptable/worth the effort to create a single libntsc package, that includes all three upstream source packages, with sub packages for -nes, -snes, -sms ? IMHO it is not worth the trouble and you could have a serious drawback. What if upstream update just -sms? You should make a new release for all three - and this is something unneeded by both end users (who would download a release for -nes and -snes for nothing) and for infrastructure (who would build a release for -nes and -snes for nothing). Separate packages is the way to go if upstream have separate independent sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458085] Review Request: nes_ntsc - Provides a NES NTSC video filtering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458085 --- Comment #4 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 17:49:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) ... Separate packages is the way to go if upstream have separate independent sources. Thanks, I thought that might be the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
