[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 13:06:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Ismael Olea 2009-07-08 12:45:13 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: htmlparser New Branches: EL-5 Owners: olea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-08 12:29:49 EDT --- This package already exists. Did you just want to add a new branch? If so, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests If you want to change owners or change who is CC'd, you can do that via the pkgdb page at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/htmlparser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ismael Olea 2009-07-07 07:19:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: htmlparser Short Description: HTML Parser, a Java library used to parse HTML Owners: olea Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-12 21:55:32 EDT --- Currently there is no need to submit a push request for F-10. When you think F-8/9 packages can be moved from testing to stable repository, please edit the submitted request on bodhi. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #17 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-12 16:23:29 EDT --- done for: htmlparser-1.6-3.fc8 htmlparser-1.6-3.fc9 Dunno how to do the equivalent for devel... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-12 03:13:26 EDT --- Please submit requests on bodhi to push packages to repositories: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #15 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-06 05:49:30 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-05 22:23:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: htmlparser Short Description: HTML Parser, a Java library used to parse HTML Owners: olea Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 10:03:30 EDT --- Okay * Notes - As said in OmegaT review request, please remove "olea" suffix from %changelog. --- This package (htmlparser) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 09:28:23 EDT --- Ah, then you want to stay in 1.6 for a moment? Then I will recheck -3 later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #11 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 08:47:56 EDT --- So, it's this package fedora‑review ? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 03:39:32 EDT --- ( I am already sponsoring ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-18 03:18:28 EDT --- Okay, then I will wait for your 1.8 beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Comment #8 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-17 15:10:08 EDT --- I've declined to write them for the moment. I'm pretty busy now and choosed to concentrate on finishing the whole OmegaT 1.7.* packaging. OTOH, It's not clear for me if there is any API change related with the licencing change too, so, my strategy is clearly conservative now :-) At some point I'll start to work on the 1.8 beta. Then I'll review this thing again and probably I'll mail them about the CPL compatibility thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Itamar Reis Peixoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||htmlparser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-08 14:28:58 EDT --- Well, now I could find your -3 srpm and the srpm itself looks good. So would you have some response from the upstream about licensing? (again the license of 1.6 htmlparser is GPLv2+, so currently there is no problem for OmegaT.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-31 11:33:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Well, > > * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this > > software > > can be > > licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration? > > Yes, it's in their website: http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/license.html > > I've just investigated into the sources of the 2.0 snapshot and it includes > only the CPL. Seems they have changed for the new version. > > I'll remove the reference of CPL on 1.6. Well, this will cause problem as OmegaT is licensed under GPLv2+ while CPL is incompatible with GPL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Currently htmlparser 1.6 is licensed under GPLv2+ so there is no problem, however for OmegaT you cannot use svn snapshot of htmlparser. Would you ask the upstream to change the license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-31 11:04:59 EDT --- I could not find -3?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287
--- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-31 06:27:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well,
> * I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software
> can be
> licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration?
Yes, it's in their website: http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/license.html
I've just investigated into the sources of the 2.0 snapshot and it includes
only the CPL. Seems they have changed for the new version.
I'll remove the reference of CPL on 1.6.
>
> * I forgot to say in my previous comment, howver for "unzip" command would you
> use
> "unzip -qq foo.zip" to suppress output? (for tar archive, rpmbuild uses "tar
> xf" and
>does not show the file list in the archive by default).
>
> * Also I forgot to say in my previous comment, however for cosmetic issue
> please unify macro usage like %{__unzip} (not %__unzip) if you use
> %{_javadir} (not %_javadir) and so on.
done
http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec
http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-3olea.src.rpm
http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-3olea.noarch.rpm
http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-3olea.noarch.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-30 12:45:41 EDT
---
Well,
* I cannot find any notes from the source codes which shows that this software
can be
licensed also under CPL. Are there any explicit declaration?
* I forgot to say in my previous comment, howver for "unzip" command would you
use
"unzip -qq foo.zip" to suppress output? (for tar archive, rpmbuild uses "tar
xf" and
does not show the file list in the archive by default).
* Also I forgot to say in my previous comment, however for cosmetic issue
please unify macro usage like %{__unzip} (not %__unzip) if you use
%{_javadir} (not %_javadir) and so on.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-29 17:15:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * License > - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should > be "LGPLv2+". done > * The place of %description > - Similar to bug 460289, please fix the place of %description ups! > * %prep stage > -- > %__unzip src.zip > -- >- Move this to %prep (to make happy with --short-circuit) done > ? Symlinking > - Similar to bug 460289, would you explain why you want to > add version to jar files' names? I try to mimmic the same practice than binary libraries (*.so). Seens reasonable for me. > * Duplicate files > - "license.txt" for -javadoc subpackge is redundant. done http://olea.org/tmp/htmlparser.spec http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-2olea.src.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-1.6-2olea.noarch.rpm http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-9/htmlparser-javadoc-1.6-2olea.noarch.rpm (I'm syncing them to the website, if find any trouble try later, please). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-29 12:29:27 EDT --- For 1.6-1: * License - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * The place of %description - Similar to bug 460289, please fix the place of %description * %prep stage -- %__unzip src.zip -- - Move this to %prep (to make happy with --short-circuit) ? Symlinking - Similar to bug 460289, would you explain why you want to add version to jar files' names? * Duplicate files - "license.txt" for -javadoc subpackge is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||428798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
