[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System   
2009-01-21 16:35:01 EDT ---
mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System   
2009-01-17 06:52:03 EDT ---
mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi   2009-01-16 22:27:00 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones   2009-01-16 05:16:34 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: mingw32-gdbm
Short Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines
Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas
Branches: EL-5 F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Tim Lauridsen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen   2009-01-16 
05:02:55 EDT ---
MUST:
* package must match the upstream source 
cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906  gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (upstream)
cd543862287f55ad66e62cc9d82cc906  gdbm-1.8.0.tar.gz (srpm)

* package is named appropriately
mingw32-*
* it is legal for Fedora to distribute this
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* specfile name matches %{name}
* summary and description fine
* correct buildroot
* %{?dist} is used
* no license text included in package  
* package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
* changelog format fine 
* Packager, Vendor ,Distribution tag not used
* License used and not Copyright 
* Summary tag does not end in a period
* specfile is legible
* package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86
* make sure lines are <= 80 characters
* specfile written in American English
* no -doc sub-package necessary
* /sbin/ldconfig used in packages containing libraries.
no native libs
* GUI app, has .desktop file and uses desktop-file-install to install it.
not a gui app
* header files goes into -devel sub-package.
no native header files
* *.so goes into -devel sub-package.
no *.so files
* macros used appropriately and consistently
* no %makeinstall
* install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
* The spec file handles locales properly (%find_lang )
no locales
* split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines
* package not relocatable
* package contains code
* package owns all directories and files
* no %files duplicates
* %defattrs present 
* %clean present
* %doc files do not affect runtime
* packages is following the MinGW guidelines
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW)

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391





--- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen   2009-01-16 
04:54:34 EDT ---
$ rpmlint Download/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles
checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gdbm.h
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.la
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgdbm.dll.a
mingw32-gdbm.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings.

Looks like false positives, because of the cross compiler nature of the
package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Tim Lauridsen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||tim.laurid...@googlemail.co
   ||m
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tim.laurid...@googlemail.co
   ||m
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen   2009-01-16 
04:48:35 EDT ---
I will take this one

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2008-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391





--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-12-10 11:29:28 
EDT ---
Spec URL:
http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/gdbm/mingw32-gdbm.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-10/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2008-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Bug 467391 depends on bug 454410, which changed state.

Bug 454410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler 
(GCC) for C and C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines

2008-10-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391


Richard W.M. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Depends on||454410
  Alias||mingw32-gdbm




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review