[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-18 11:52:55 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #49 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-12 12:34:56 EDT --- For F-10, please visit bodhi and submit request to push the rebuild package into repositories: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #48 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-09 17:05:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #45 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 05:42:06 EDT --- Sorry, used the wrong title (if some script searches this then it wouldn't catch it, right?) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rear Short Description: Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Owners: gdha Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: gdha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-08 06:52:52 EDT --- Please set fedora-cvs flag to ? for CVS Request (the reason I don't do this for you is that I want to check if you can actually change fedora-cvs flag without error) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-08 07:03:07 EDT --- Oh dear - missed that one indeed - fedora-cvs has been set to ? now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #44 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-05 15:30:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Package === Package Name: rear Short Description: Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Owners: gdha Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: gdha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-04 12:47:53 EDT --- Well, would you write CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #42 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-04-02 10:39:10 EDT --- Note to myself before requesting CVS access: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.20-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
--- Comment #40 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@gmail.com 2009-03-31
07:51:26 EDT ---
One e-mail address is now in use: gratien.dha...@gmail.com
My account on FAS is 'gdha'
I do have one question concerning our %{_localstatedir}/rear directory (points
now to /var/rear), but according http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.8.html
it should point to /var/lib/rear. Isn't it better to change this so we're
compliant with FHS 2.2?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-31 11:33:25 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. (In reply to comment #40) Isn't it better to change this so we're compliant with FHS 2.2? Actually we should use %_localstatedir/lib . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-30 14:50:18 EDT --- Well, I checked your commitment very quickly and they seem acceptable. This package (rear) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. I found a account on FAS (Fedora Account System) which is perhaps yours, however the mail account used on FAS differs from what you are using on RH bugzilla, they must coincide. Please fix either of the e-mail address, then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #39 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-30 15:07:47 EDT --- Great - thanks. I'll fix my mail account with fedora to become the same as FAS. Keep you informed when that is done. I'll read the docs first and if I'm stuck somewhere I'll let you know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-29 10:02:21 EDT --- Okay, then I will leave lib64 issue as this is. Then, to Gratien: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check No one is reviewing) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #34 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-28 09:54:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) - What I meant by the previous comment is that it looks strange that there is /usr/share/rear/skel/default/lib64 directory but /usr/share/rear/skel/default/usr/lib64 does not exist in this package, for example. I did an experiment with FC9 on a x86_64 platform: - ran 'rear mkrescue' of rear-1.7.19 without modification and - once with creating an empty directory under skel/usr/lib64 and ran 'rear mkrescue' again Boot initrd were extracted in a temporary directory to compare the file structure: [r...@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs/usr total 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root6 2009-03-28 12:49 bin - ../bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root6 2009-03-28 12:49 lib - ../lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root3 2009-03-28 12:49 sbin - bin drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2009-03-28 12:49 share [r...@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs_2/usr total 8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root6 2009-03-28 14:41 bin - ../bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root6 2009-03-28 14:41 lib - ../lib drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-03-28 14:41 lib64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root3 2009-03-28 14:41 sbin - bin drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2009-03-28 14:41 share [r...@sloeber lib64]# ls -l /tmp/rootfs_2/usr/lib64/ The /usr/lib64 directory remains empty. If you wish we could make a symlink to ../../lib64? Did a boot test with the first iso image, which went fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #35 from Schlomo Schapiro red...@schlomo.schapiro.org 2009-03-28 15:19:14 EDT --- Everybody who takes a closer look at the ReaR rescue system should keep in mind that we do not build a FHS compliant system but rather copy all binaries to /bin, all libraries to /lib (and /lib64 if appropriate) and some stuff to /usr/share (like termcap etc.). We only keep lib and lib64 apart but do not support lib32 and bin32 or bin64 directories. Therefore the directories under /usr (like bin,lib etc.) are only symlinks because some programs expect their binaries there. Adding some more symlinks is not a problem, we have a script for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-19 12:39:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) - we have tested rear on 64-bit platforms (AMD, IA64) and the lib64 stuff you find under the skel directory are necessary (empty) directories where rear (in rescue mode) will copy files into (in the build area created for that purpose). All other necessary items (files, libraries) will be copied automatically by the rear mkrescue process. We have tested on fedora10 too. - What I meant by the previous comment is that it looks strange that there is /usr/share/rear/skel/default/lib64 directory but /usr/share/rear/skel/default/usr/lib64 does not exist in this package, for example. Assigning to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #32 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-18 08:28:16 EDT --- New development release of Relax and Recover (rear) is available: Development release 1.7.19 uploaded the latest files to the URLs mentioned below and also to the SourceForge file section of 1.7.19: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.noarch.rpm md5sums: 18e78dc738085c9fae3165898024e92d rear-1.7.19.tar.gz f744c1922a0beca391b54b4800556874 rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 9fd390b7fe6adb81a8b3d083baf03985 rear-1.7.19-1.fc10.src.rpm 6e4e83ca3e6f721f3b038837aefe6c81 rear.spec SourceForge pages of development version 1.7.19: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824release_id=669144 What changed in between? - man page removed from doc section - rpmbuild gzips the man page itself - thanks I wasn't aware of this feature. - updated the rear.spec file - made it better readable - the non-fedora directories under /usr/share/rear/build are related to the internals of rear itself as it is disaster recovery framework that supports Fedora, RHEL, SUSE, OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, Gentoo, and so on. Please notice that there are also directories containing scripts to integrate with other (commercial) backups solutions such as TSM, Data Protector or NetBackup. We prefer to keep that at least intact with other distributions. Otherwise, we may come into conflicting situations that a fedora rpm doesn't work on RHEL for example. If you need more information on how rear works internally I would recommend to check out the concept guide (part of the doc section). - we have tested rear on 64-bit platforms (AMD, IA64) and the lib64 stuff you find under the skel directory are necessary (empty) directories where rear (in rescue mode) will copy files into (in the build area created for that purpose). All other necessary items (files, libraries) will be copied automatically by the rear mkrescue process. We have tested on fedora10 too. best regards - Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-12 12:56:28 EDT --- Some remarks and questions * Shipping rear.8 as %doc is really confusing for this package - because the installed rear.8.gz man file (modified by sed command) _differs_ (i.e. is saying something different) sfrom the original rear.8 installed as %doc. Please remove rear.8 from %doc * The installed man files are actually gzipped by rpmbuild itself. Please leave stripping man files to rpmbuild and don't strip by yourself. ? It seems that this package installs somefiles which are related to the distributions different from Fedora (like /usr/share/rear/build/Debian or so). Would you explain why these files are needed? ? Would you check if your rpm work on 64 bits architecture? For example, this package contains /usr/share/rear/skel/default/lib64 but does not have /usr/share/rear/skel/default/usr/lib64 . Is this as expected? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #331310|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #29 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-02 08:32:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333734) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333734) Validation output of rear-1.7.16 package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #30 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-03-02 09:14:24 EDT --- New development release of Relax and Recover (rear) is available: Development release 1.7.16. What happened in the meantime? 1/ rear has been uploaded into the SVN area of SourceForge: http://rear.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rear/ 2/ the doc files are not twice available anymore in the RPMs. 3/ made the spec a bit cleaner (readable) 4/ uploaded the latest files to the URLs mentioned below and also to the SourceForge file section of 1.7.16: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.16-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.16-1.fc9.noarch.rpm f708a6f84862466d857bf0352cc95b58 rear.spec 60c84ba4d0653dc329a02dd43da1bbdc rear-1.7.16-1.fc9.noarch.rpm b6e9630048003b10419031d41d9c963d rear-1.7.16-1.fc9.src.rpm 7704f5818a6c858dc36271fe00b253dd rear-1.7.16.tar.gz SourceForge pages of development version 1.7.16: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824release_id=665214 5/ I've added the validation output of rear-1.7.16 rpmbuilds as an attachment to the report (see previous comment #29; sorry should had attached it with this comment). If there are any questions please let me know what we can do to help you? Thanks, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #28 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-02-16 04:17:05 EDT --- Hi Robert and Andreas, Thank you (again) for being so helpful. Robert, Yes, you may send me an example of the if clause as you talked about in c#26. That would be very helpful as a starter. Andreas, That sounds fine to me! Thanks. About SVN I meant that we probably will upload our sources into SVN very soon so it would become easier for us (and other developers) to sync with the latest updates. Please give me a few days (I have a very, very busy week with making a presentation and a deadline of sub-project) to discuss this over with my friend Schlomo and to prepare rear for the latest suggestions. Rgds, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(gratien.dha...@it | |3.be) | --- Comment #25 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-02-13 10:58:46 EDT --- Hi all, thank you (Robert) for taking a closer look into rear - much appreciated - the goal is indeed to make the software cleaner (and better). As Schlomo (in #24) already mentioned the doc files are kept double for the simple reason that it is very easy to make a new 'in-house' rpm for example (with the command 'rear mkrpm'). However, if we must exclude them, we can of course. In that case the customers who want to build their own in-house rpms should work with a tar-ball of rear instead. Less convenient I think, but not impossible. We could also provide SVN/CVS to accomplish this. What does fedora recommend? In the rpmls output all directories have mode 755. I think Robert question was to check if the /usr/share/rear directory was meant to be in read-only mode. The short answer is yes. During a normal run (mkrescue/mkbackup workflow) rear will not write nor modify anything under /usr/share/rear. We have /var/rear which will be used to create the recovery information under. Do not hesitate to ask if you need more clarification. We're happy to answer and to comply as much as possible to fedora's rules. best regards, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
--- Comment #26 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-02-13
16:39:21 EDT ---
Right, I just wanted to make sure, that /usr/share/rear usually doesn't get
touched at all and dynamic stuff ends in /var or the config stuff in /etc.
I didn't get the SVN/CVS suggestion.
I think, the rear mkrpm thing can easily solved with some RPM macros inside
of the spec file which do just the right thing, if it is executed on Fedora
and/or RHEL. Would that be acceptable for you? E.g.
%if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel}
rm -f unwanted-file-at-fedora
%endif
Or
%if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel}
# Fedora specific stuff
%else
# Other distribution stuff
%endif
If that's okay, I would try to provide you a working example. Hopefully I got
your point correct, but I think so. Just let me know...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Andreas Thienemann andr...@bawue.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andr...@bawue.net --- Comment #27 from Andreas Thienemann andr...@bawue.net 2009-02-13 17:38:09 EDT --- Hello Gratien, Robert was kind enough to ask me whether I'd be willing to sponsor this. A cursory glance at the spec looks good, but please add some linebreaks and \ to the long lines in the %install part of the .spec file. This makes things much easier to read. The review looks okay so far, seems the .spec has come a long way. :) As soon as Robert indicates he's finished I'll do a final test of the software and recheck the review. After that, I'd be happy to sponsor you. That okay with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.d
||e
--- Comment #23 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-02-12
15:25:57 EDT ---
I don't know rear, but when looking to the package, I've got a few points:
- /usr/share/rear/CHANGES, /usr/share/rear/COPYING, /usr/share/rear/README,
you're shipping twice. Kill the files in /usr/share/rear, because one time
using %doc is enough.
- Why is /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt marked as configuration file? Is
it a configuration file? Either it's a readme or it is a configuration file;
but if it's readme, it should go into %doc from my point of view.
- What's /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_*? Looks like readmes as well, yes/no?
- /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.15/rear.8 is shipped already in %{_mandir}, so please
not also in %doc, twice is too much.
- /usr/share/rear/doc contains stuff, which is already covered by %doc and/or
%{_mandir}, so please do not ship the directory at the RPM package.
- Is /usr/share/rear meant to be readonly? /usr/share/rear/skel looks to me as
it would be used read-writeable as well.
- I'm not sure, whether /var/rear is correct, what will this directory contain
when it is in regular use?
- You maybe want to use BuildArch rather BuildArchitectures, but that is
just cosmetic.
- Do you really need binutils as during runtime? Just wondering...
I don't expect you to change all my stuff mentioned above, various has maybe
to get discussed first. Can somebody summarize how /usr/share/rear is used and
which meaning it has? No changing content during rear usage?
Maybe more will come up, that's what I discovered with the first run...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Schlomo Schapiro red...@schlomo.schapiro.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(gratien.dha...@it ||3.be) --- Comment #24 from Schlomo Schapiro red...@schlomo.schapiro.org 2009-02-12 16:29:58 EDT --- Hi, I can shed some light on these questions. - ReaR comes as a self-contained package without any dedicated source distribution. This means that every ReaR installation contains everything needed to make a new package (e.g. rear mkrpm). This is very important for the ReaR development process which requires the developer to *trash* the development machine for each and every test. So we simply edit the files, do rear mkrpm, copy aside the RPM and try whether ReaR works (e.g. recovers the system). As a result some files exist twice, once in their source location under /usr/share/rear and once in their installed location (%doc, %mandir). Since the locations for these are not the same throughout all Linux distros it would be difficult to always collect them from their (possibly unknown) installed location prior to creating the RPM. - the files under /etc/rear are all files that the end-user should change to suit their environment. The *.conf files are actual configurations and the other files are templates that are used by ReaR to create for example the readme file that resides on the ReaR Rescue CD or the email that is sent. So yes, they look like a readme and they are in fact a readme but not for ReaR as a package but for the result that ReaR creates (the rescue media). - in /var/rear we create the recovery data which is machine-dependant and obviously not part of the shipped RPM package - /usr/share/rear should be 755, must be a copy bug somewhere or in the SPEC file. We will fix this of course, no question. HTH, Schlomo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #21 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-02-09 08:14:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331310) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331310) Validation output of rear-1.7.15 package wrote a script to automate the validation process of a rear package. In this way we're using a consistent way of testing any updates on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #22 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-02-09 08:24:16 EDT --- NEXT ACTIONS: 1/ still need a full review of the package by an approved package maintainer 2/ still need to find a sponsor for myself (see next message to candidate sponsors) Message to (candidate) sponsors: We have been involved with the following bug reports: * Full reviews made for: 187318 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: mondo 473835 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool 480851 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams * Involved with comments for: 463035 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool 473184 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader 474802 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program New release of Relax and Recover (rear) is available: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.noarch.rpm b2d1bb5591884dbd39565af24f1287c9 rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.src.rpm SourceForge pages of development version 1.7.15: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824release_id=659729 I do not want to overload the bug report. therefore, I added the validation output as an attachment to the report. Thanks, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #20 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-01-14 05:33:55 EDT --- Ran the validation script on 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64 type of system with the same results (as on a x86 platform): # valrear == == Make a fresh RPM of Relax and Recover (rear) URL: http://rear.sourceforge.net == == Relax Recover Version 1.7.12 / 2009-01-09 Creating archive '/tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz' OK Creating RPM packages OK OK Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Finished in 3 seconds. == Unpack /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear## == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SPECS/rear.spec == 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpm -qp --requires /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 == rpm -qp --info /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == Name: rear Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.7.12Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Wed 14 Jan 2009 11:25:28 AM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: sloeber Group : Applications/ArchivingSource RPM: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Size: 468819 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) URL : http://rear.sourceforge.net Summary : Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Description : Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). This is work in progress, so some features are not yet implemented. == rpm -qpd /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (docfiles) == /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/README /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/readme.txt /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/validated/Fedora/9/i386.txt == rpm -qpc /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (configfiles) == /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf.rpmnew /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf.rpmsave /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf /etc/rear/default.conf /etc/rear/local.conf /etc/rear/os.conf /etc/rear/site.conf /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|fab...@bernewireless.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #19 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-01-09 07:45:33 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm The validation script I wrote to test the RPMs produced the following output: == == Make a fresh RPM of Relax and Recover (rear) URL: http://rear.sourceforge.net == == Relax Recover Version 1.7.12 / 2009-01-09 Creating archive '/tmp/rear-1.7.12.tar.gz OK Creating RPM packages OK Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Finished in 6 seconds. == Unpack /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear## == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm == rear.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/SPECS/rear.spec == 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == rpm -qp --requires /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == /bin/bash binutils config(rear) = 1.7.12-1.fc9 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 == rpm -qp --info /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm == Name: rear Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.7.12Vendor: (none) Release : 1.fc9 Build Date: Fri 09 Jan 2009 01:02:34 PM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: localhost.localdomain Group : Applications/ArchivingSource RPM: rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Size: 466172 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) URL : http://rear.sourceforge.net Summary : Relax and Recover (ReaR) is a Linux Disaster Recovery framework Description : Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). This is work in progress, so some features are not yet implemented. == rpm -qpd /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (docfiles) == /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/README /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/readme.txt /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.12/validated/Fedora/9/i386.txt == rpm -qpc /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.12-1.fc9.noarch.rpm (configfiles) == /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf /etc/rear/default.conf /etc/rear/local.conf /etc/rear/site.conf /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt /etc/rear/templates/ISO_isolinux.cfg
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #16 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2008-12-30 09:44:17 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm We're finally getting there! # rpmlint -v -i /home/gdha/RPM/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.13 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot INFO: enabled root cache INFO: root cache aged out! cache will be rebuilt INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: creating cache State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(/home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.11-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(default) 10 minutes 21 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result I think the time has arrived to find a sponsor for this project. Best wishes and a fruitful open source 2009 !! Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 15:34:16 EDT --- Source 0 is not available (http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rear/rear-1.7.11.tar.gz). According to http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835 the latest stable version is 1.6 and the latest devel is 1.7.9. Time to update the SF page (and maybe freshmeat, too) ? Source RPM: rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 = please chmod 644 the file before doing rpmbuild -bs The following directories are left unowned: /etc/rear/ /etc/rear/templates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-30 15:37:59 EDT --- Uhm, I see that both /bin/sh and /bin/bash are needed: [wo...@wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires rear-1.7.11-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /bin/bash /bin/sh binutils config(rear) = 1.7.11-1.fc11 iputils mingetty portmap rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 It's a bit unusual, since /bin/bash is a superset of /bin/sh. Is it really intended to bring in botth or you have just not been constant in using either one or the other in the scripts that you have packaged ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Schlomo Schapiro red...@schlomo.schapiro.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||red...@schlomo.schapiro.org --- Comment #14 from Schlomo Schapiro red...@schlomo.schapiro.org 2008-12-14 10:08:36 EDT --- Hi, I am - together with Gratien - the main developer of Relax and Recover. I am currently trying to find a sponsor, is there anything else missing so far? A few notes about the issues mentioned above from a ReaR design point of view: 1) ReaR brings along the empty filesystem of a mini linux distribution (no binaries) which is the reason for the empty files and symlinks pointing nowhere. As part of the ReaR process to create the rescue media this empty filesystem is filled in with components from the current linux system to create a functioning mini linux rescue system. Is there a way to get along with the empty files and dead symlinks? 2) ReaR does not have a -devel package and - by design - always contains the entire distribution. That is why you will also find .deb and gentoo files as part of every ReaR installation so that any user can package his/her (modified) version of ReaR without installing any additional tools. Since ReaR is written entirely in Bash there is no platform or distribution dependency beyond what ReaR is already doing internally. Of course we could leave these under /usr/share/rear and not copy them to %doc. Kind regards, Schlomo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #15 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2008-12-15 00:10:05 EDT --- The problems issued by rpmbuild /var/tmp/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.9 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf means that in your %files section, the above mentioned two files are specified twice. I did not look over the spec, but may times this warning is caused by including once the directory and a second time a specific file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2008-12-13 17:00:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Use chmod to switch the permission before you use rpmbuild locally, then the warning will go away. One remark... - leave contrib in %doc away. On a RPM based system it's not interesting how to build stuff for a gentoo system. Did you find a sponsor in the meantime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #12 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-02 07:47:19 EDT --- Hello all, Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm sorry for the long delay, but in the meantime most items are fixed. After the build checked using a non-privilege user makerpm the quality of the rpm using rpmlint (and as root used mock too). There are 2 items I'm apparently not able to fix (most likely I do not know how to fix these). 1/ during the rpmbuild the warnings about file listed twice 2/ rear.spec not in correct permission mode Both errors pop up with root, under my account and with the special makerpm account, but none of these users have an impact with this (build/install is ok). [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ ls rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpm -ivh rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm 1:rear ### [100%] [EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ cd .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ ls SOURCES/ rear-1.7.9.tar.gz [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ rpmbuild -ba SPECS/rear.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23801 ... + cp -pr CHANGES README doc/readme.txt contrib /var/tmp/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.9 + exit 0 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf ... $ rpmlint -i SPECS/rear.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -i SRPMS/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.9-1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # mock -r default rebuild /home/gdha/RPM/SRPMS/rear-1.7.9 == only warning: file listed twice notices as with the rpmbuild phase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-10 16:39:04
EDT ---
I really think that the remove of the SuSE releated stuff from the spec file
would make it more readable.
- sorry, the right URL is
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- Your Buildroot don't match the Guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
- %defattr(-,root,root) is often %defattr(-,root,root,-) to leave the default
directory permissions in place
- Changelog: After every entry a blank line would be nice. It's definitely
easier to read
- License: Spec file: GPLv3+
rearGPLv2+
- Clean your Buildroot before you start doing stuff there
rm -rf %{buildroot} or rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- cp -a usr etc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/
Please preserve the timestamps
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
- Warning during rpm build process
warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf
warning: File listed twice: /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf
...
...
only add %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rear/ (delete all other lines with
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rear/*.*) to add that directory and its
contents recursively (beware not tested and not sure about the permissions)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #10 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-29 11:46:20 EDT --- Updated the rear.spec file and rear source rpm: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Our development version 1.7.8 has been uploaded to SF: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824 Some additional remarks on the rpmlint output - see further: $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/contrib ./usr/share/rear/contrib The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh bash The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/README ./usr/share/rear/README The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/CHANGES ./usr/share/rear/CHANGES The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/init bin/init The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/log/lastlog rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/lib/nfs/state rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/etc/mtab 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. Comment 1: The zero-length errors are normal as we need those empty files during the creation of the ROOT file system image of the rescue system. These files are needed once we boot from ReaR.iso to have a sane rescue system. Comment 2: the relative symbolic link points nowhere errors are normal as these will become meaningful when the package gets installed. Comment 3: the .bash_history file lives under the /usr/share/rear/skel structure, which gets tar'ed to the final ROOT file system of the rescue environment. So, it is meant to be a hidden file. I hope this is OK for you? best regards, Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #9 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 07:37:27 EDT --- Hi all, Busy with correcting the rear.spec and some other comments you mentioned above. I've seeing now: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/contrib ./usr/share/rear/contrib The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh bash The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/README ./usr/share/rear/README The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/CHANGES ./usr/share/rear/CHANGES The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/init bin/init The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/log/lastlog rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/lib/nfs/state rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/etc/mtab 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7. Error: no installed packages by name /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7. 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. == Rear makes usage of relative symbolic links. Is there a way to suppress these warning? Or is it safe to ignore? == the zero-length file are necessary when we build a boot image. We can safely ignore these errors. Is there a way to tell in rear.spec file to say we can ignore zero length files? Would like to avoid submitting a new version which still produces errors during a rpmlint investigation. thanks, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||rear -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-25 10:08:53
EDT ---
Once again.
Source0: http://downloads.sourgeforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
- It's 'sourceforge', just a type...
Release: 1%{?dist}
- After you made any changes, please bump the release.
%changelog - rpmlint issue
* Thu Oct 24 2008 Gratien D'haese
- rewrote rear.spec for FedoraCore Packaging request
* Tue Aug 28 2006 Schlomo Schapiro
- Initial RPM Release
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
Example:
* Wed Jun 14 2003 Joe Packager joe at gmail.com - 1.0-2
- Added README file (#42).
^ ^
| |
This is the version --- |
This is the release --
BTW, it's only Fedora, we don't use Core anymore.
I'm able to build your package but rpmlint complain about a lot of stuff...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.src.rpm
rear.src: W: non-standard-group System/Archiving
The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are:
Amusements/Games, Amusements/Graphics, Applications/Archiving,
Applications/Communications, Applications/Databases,
Applications/Editors, Applications/Emulators, Applications/Engineering,
Applications/File, Applications/Internet, Applications/Multimedia,
Applications/Productivity, Applications/Publishing, Applications/System,
Applications/Text, Development/Debug, Development/Debuggers,
Development/Languages, Development/Libraries, Development/System,
Development/Tools, Documentation, System Environment/Base, System
Environment/Daemons, System Environment/Kernel, System
Environment/Libraries, System Environment/Shells, User
Interface/Desktops, User Interface/X, User Interface/X Hardware Support.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint -i rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/rear/lib/cfg2html-linux
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.7/DEVELOPMENT
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_USB.txt
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh
bash
The relative symbolic link points nowhere.
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/pack/hpasmcliOutput.txt
rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/rear/verify/TSM/default/40_verify_tsm.sh
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.
rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.
rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/USB_syslinux.cfg
A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a
configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration
files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file.
rear.noarch: W:
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 03:31:44
EDT ---
Just a few comments on your spec file.
Release: 1
- add %{?dist} - Release: 1%{?dist}
Source: rear-%{version}.tar.gz
- The source should come from upstream.
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
License: GPL
- is GPLv3+
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines
Packager: Schlomo Schapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gratien D'haese
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Packager tag is not used in Fedora
Provides: rear
- This package doesn't provide any virtual packages. I think it's save to
remove
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Other_tags
Vendor: probusiness Berlin AG and IT3 Consultants
- Vendor tag is not used in Fedora
%files section
- Please use macros it will be easier to maintain the package in the future
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros
Details about the changelog
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
Please check
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo or
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for further details.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 03:39:18 EDT --- If this is your first package, you need to seek a sponsor. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||3.be) --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 03:44:30 EDT --- Another appendix In your spec file is 'Version: 1.7.7' but the current stable version is 1.6 (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=196474) and the development version is 1.7.6 (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 06:54:57 EDT --- Ref Provides: rear, Fabian is right. Please ditch it and let rpmbuild pick whatever it needs to pick. It would also be nice if you could respect the template we are using for fedora spec files. Sticking the changelog in the middle of the spec is neither incorrect nor forbidden but it is very unusual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |3.be) | --- Comment #6 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 07:12:17 EDT --- Thank you all for the very useful comments. I'm digging into the docs (sorry I hadn't seen these before) and trying to get it straight. Will use rpmlint to investigate the spec before I uploaded it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #7 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-24 08:28:46 EDT --- Updated the Blocks field with FE-NEEDSPONSOR as I still need a sponsor. Updated the rear.spec file and rear source rpm: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.src.rpm On our development version 1.7.7 has been uploaded to SF: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835package_id=287824 If there are any other points let me know how I can be of any help. thanks, Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #1 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:42:02 EDT --- Main web-site is http://rear.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
