[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-14 10:45:35 EDT ---
docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-01-14 22:06:33 EDT ---
docbook5-schemas-5.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.
 If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #5 from Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com  2009-01-13 
10:43:37 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
2411c19ed4fb141f3fa3d389fae40736  docbook-5.0.zip
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is NOT included in package.
redistributable without licence
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ package docbook-schemas-5.0-1-fc11 -
Provides:
  config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-dtd = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-rng = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-sch = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-xsd = 5.0-1.fc11
  docbook5-schemas = 5.0-1.fc11
Requires:
  /bin/sh  
  /bin/sh  
  /usr/bin/perl  
  config(docbook5-schemas) = 5.0-1.fc11
  libxml2 = 2.4.8
  libxml2 = 2.4.8
  perl(English)  
  perl(strict)  
  rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
  rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
  rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1
  xml-common = 0.6.3-24
+ Not a GUI app.
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com  2009-01-13 10:56:01 EDT 
---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: docbook5-schemas
Short Description: Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for
Docbook 5.X
Owners: ovasik
Branches: F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-01-13 15:28:07 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #2 from Michal Marciniszyn mmarc...@redhat.com  2009-01-12 
11:25:41 EDT ---
Does not rebuild in mock, please check buildrequires and add all that are
needed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com  2009-01-12 11:47:38 EDT 
---
Thanks... BuildRequires: libxml2 = 2.4.8 was missing, as xmlcatalog used in
build section as well. Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||gia...@gmail.com




--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com  2009-01-12 12:03:03 EDT 
---

(In reply to comment #3)
 Updated files provided to reviewer via nfs share...

Not that there is anything wrong with this, but maybe you're just not aware of
the very handy storage service available to all Fedora contributors:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2008-12-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243


Michal Marciniszyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471243] Review Request: docbook5-schemas - Norman Walsh's schemas (DTD, Relax NG, W3C schema) for Docbook 5.X

2008-11-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471243





--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-13 14:06:04 EDT 
---
Other possibility would be to name the package itself just docbook5 and to have
subpackages for schemas (docbook5-dtd , docbook5-rng , docbook5-sch and
docbook5-xsd) ... I'm ok with it if the future reviewer will think that this
name and package split would be more useful for users.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review