[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-08 23:59:15 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 00:15:03 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 |7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 00:18:32 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 |7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-07 04:02:56 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-07 04:03:42 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-07 04:04:23 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-07 06:21:23 EDT --- Thanks. If any updates came on skinlf please let us know on tvbrowser review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-06 16:58:36 EDT --- cvs done (with F-11 branch as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #21 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-30 03:04:11 EDT --- Sure will do, thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: l2fprod-common Short Description: In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces Owners: red Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017
--- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-29 02:56:51
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec
SRPM URL:
http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-4.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm
* License
- Removing file in %prep
- Notified upstream
* CVS directory
- Removing in %prep
* Comments
- Removed (no copy-paste but sort of backup during the last edit...simply
forgot to remove them before uploading)
* Multilue jar files (including symlink)
- Done.
! Using xargs
- Done.
! About creating many symlinks manually
- Great input, thanks. Done.
! use %{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar in %files
- Done.
FYI: Right now, there's still some stuff from 7.3-3 in 7.3-4 but commented, in
case there's a problem with the new changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-29 12:57:41 EDT --- Well, - For the line javadoc -classpath ... I recommend to use find - xargs also here, like: -- find src/java -name '*.java' -print 0 \ xargs -0 javadoc -classpath \ `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` -d doc -- - I recommend to remove unneeded comments because it makes spec file less readable. - Please make main package own %_javadir/%name Please fix the issues above before importing. --- This package (l2fprod-common) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag|needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject |fedora-review?
|.org) |
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-28
15:07:04 EDT ---
Well, for 7.3-3:
* License
- Sorry, I missed it however one file is still under
ASL 2.0
-
src/tests/com/l2fprod/common/demo/MainUnitTest.java
-
Can this file be removed at %prep? (Your spec file
seems to be using files only under src/java, so
I guess it is possible)
! Note that only removing this file at %prep is enough.
No need to remove this file from tarball itself.
* CVS directory
- It is recommended to clean up CVS directory at %prep like:
-
find . -type d -name CVS | sort -r | xargs rm -rf
-
* Comments
- What are the comments like
-
###rm -rf docs lib
src/com/l2fprod/common/springrcp
-
for? (I guess you just copy-and-pasted mistakenly...)
* Multilue jar files (including symlink)
- The following guideline seems to be saying that this package
should create a directory and move all jar files (including symlinks)
into the directory:
-
If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must
place them into a sub-directory.
-
And some suggestion about spec file clean up
! Using xargs
- From the line
-
javac -d target -cp `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` `find src/java
-name '*.java'`
-
build.log shows lots of output messages brought from
`find src/java -name '*.java'` like:
-
46 + javac -d target -cp
/usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTip.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTipModel.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/TipLoader.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/TipModel.java
.
-
In this case I usually use xargs like:
-
find src/java -name '*.java' -print0 | xargs -0 javac -d target -cp
`build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar`
-
With this, build.log shows:
-
48 + find src/java -name '*.java' -print0
49 ++ build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar
50 + xargs -0 javac -d target -cp
/usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar
51 src/java/sheet/com/l2fprod/common/beans/BeanUtils.java:41: warning:
non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for last
parameter;
52 cast to java.lang.Class for a varargs call
-
which is much easier to look at.
! About creating many symlinks manually
- I think this is error-prone. I guess the following is better:
--
install -m644 %{name}-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all-%{version}.jar
ln -s %{name}-all-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all.jar
for dir in src/java/*/
do
subname=$(basename $dir)
for exception in \
demo springrcp
do
if [ $subname = $exception ] ; then continue 2 ; fi
done
ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}.jar
ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}-%{version}.jar
done
---
Also I would just use %{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar in %files
(however also see the previous comment about
Multilue jar files (including symlink).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #13 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-27 11:43:42 EDT --- ping? I understand it that you wanted to look at the latest CVS - am I mistaken here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-27 12:23:38 EDT --- What I said is that I want you to check the latest CVS if license issue is resolved. However if you provide the URL of the upstream CVS I can check about license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #15 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-27 12:34:54 EDT --- My apologies, I misunderstood you, in that case. For me, it looks like ASL 2.0 in CVS now - but as you know, I'm not good in checking licenses. I'd appreciate if you could verify that the code in their CVS is allright now. The information about upstream's CVS can be found on the following page: http://www.l2fprod.com/common/contribute.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-27 13:07:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) The information about upstream's CVS can be found on the following page: http://www.l2fprod.com/common/contribute.php I checked this CVS and currently all files are under ASL 2.0. If you create new srpm based on the latest CVS I will remove FE-Legal blocker. By the way, how about skinlf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #17 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-04-27 19:17:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-3.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm New version based on the latest CVS. The spec file was only changed to: - reflect the 'post release' packaging based on a cvs checkout - use some new paths which were changed upstream - nothing major Looking at skinlf's latest CVS (same server, but project is named skinlf instead of l2fprod-common), upstream did not adapt the licenses there AFAICS. I'll check what upstream has to say about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-03-13 03:54:56 EDT --- Sorry, I don't see what I have to renew the SRPM for - do I need to change anything currently? I don't see any comment indicating such a thing... The license has not yet changed in the distributed package from upstream, so I won't change this here (nothing new from upstream) - or shall I go for the CVS? Still not sure if all licenses were corrected there, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-13 10:50:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) The license has not yet changed in the distributed package from upstream, so I won't change this here (nothing new from upstream) - or shall I go for the CVS? Still not sure if all licenses were corrected there, though. I want to see if the license is changed in the latest CVS. If so you can use CVS source for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-09 12:57:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject ||.org) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-03-01 11:27:15 EDT --- Any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-13 10:14:30 EDT --- I will recheck this package once the srpm is renewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-02-12 13:49:45 EDT --- There is no legal problem here, I see the notes in 472144 about the relicensing. Please be sure you update the spec appropriately as upstream cleans up (and simplifies) their licensing. Lifting FE-Legal here, leaving it on tvbrowser for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-01-29 18:23:29 EDT --- AFAICS this shouldn't block l2fprod-common but only tvbrowser or am I missing something? Anyway, even if this blocks l2fprod-common - we know upstream is willing to change the license. Can we maybe continue with the review in the meantime (i.e. get it ready to approve it as soon as the legal issue is fixed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks||182235 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-16 13:47:25 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal. This package itself is okay (ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0), however ASL 1.1 conflicts with GPLv2+ (i.e. tvbrowser, bug 472144) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Bug 475017 depends on bug 474981, which changed state. Bug 474981 Summary: Review Request: jcalendar - A Java date chooser bean for graphically picking a date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474981 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Bug 475017 depends on bug 474982, which changed state. Bug 474982 Summary: Review Request: nachocalendar - Provides a flexible Calendar component to the Java Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474982 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2008-12-18 17:01:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Rebuilt on rawhide. Now using build-classpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-12-15 10:01:49 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s...@sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2008-12-15 23:30:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm New version including much of the experience I got when my jcalendar pkg was reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org 2008-12-11 20:01:50 EDT --- Successfully created a mock-(re)build of this version of this pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||472144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||474981, 474982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
