[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-04-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979





--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System   
2009-01-29 18:05:09 EDT ---
python-libasyncns-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1122

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System   
2009-01-21 16:33:12 EDT ---
python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-libasyncns'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0794

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System   
2009-01-17 05:36:36 EDT ---
python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi   2009-01-16 22:16:09 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl   2009-01-16 08:55:17 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: python-libasyncns
Short Description: Python binding for libasyncns
Owners: mcepl
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Jesse Keating  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Jesse Keating   2009-01-15 19:17:52 
EDT ---
Looks good now, approving.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2009-01-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com) |




--- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl   2009-01-15 12:29:09 EDT ---
New version of SRPM:
http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm
New version of the Spec file:
http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-libasyncns.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Jesse Keating  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Jesse Keating  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jkeat...@redhat.com
   Flag||needinfo?(mc...@redhat.com)




--- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating   2008-12-22 00:05:49 
EDT ---
Taking review.

- Only define one of python_sitelib or python_sitearch.
- 'the' in Summary seems unnecessary
- Does not currently build in rawhide, requires libasyncns >=0.4  Add
BuildRequires: libasyncns-devel
- rpmlint output: python-libasyncns.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/libasyncns.so 0775
- None of the files in test/ are licensed

Otherwise OK, so please fix the above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979





--- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl   2008-12-19 07:40:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can surely review this package, but which version of Gajim are you referring
> to? I could not find Gajim 0.12 using it.

Current post-0.12 SVN version uses it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Debarshi Ray  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(debarshi@gmai |
   |l.com)  |




--- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray   2008-12-18 23:33:13 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Debarshi, wouldn't you make a review of this package? It will be used by the
> next version of gajim.

I can surely review this package, but which version of Gajim are you referring
to? I could not find Gajim 0.12 using it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||debarshi@gmail.com
   Flag||needinfo?




--- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl   2008-12-18 07:55:29 EDT ---
Debarshi, wouldn't you make a review of this package? It will be used by the
next version of gajim.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 476979] Review Request: python-libasyncns - Python binding for the libasyncns

2008-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476979


Matej Cepl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?   |needinfo?(debarshi@gmai
   ||l.com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review