[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:44:03 EDT --- ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-15 09:25:14 EDT --- Thanks everyone, this is now built in F-10 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-15 09:24:37 EDT --- ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-14 16:24:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-14 04:16:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-preludeml Short Description: OCaml utility functions Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-14 04:14:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, this one still builds for me, and I guess I'm lucky to be building on the > one platform where the tests pass, because I get: > Ran: 333 tests in: 0.72 seconds. > OK Yes, the tests only work on x86-64. 1/333 fails on 32 bit platforms, and lots of things fail on ppc64. I'm going to raise the issue with upstream. Thanks for your patience looking at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-01-13 20:35:48 EDT --- OK, this one still builds for me, and I guess I'm lucky to be building on the one platform where the tests pass, because I get: Ran: 333 tests in: 0.72 seconds. OK I don't see anything in particular to complain about, so: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-13 09:30:36 EDT --- An even more updated version that runs the automated tests and builds in Koji: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.10.20090113.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.1-0.10.20090113 - Tests require ounit & ruby. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1049598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-13 08:33:39 EDT --- Here's an updated version which includes the license information and bumps everything to the latest version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.4.20090113.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Jan 13 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.1-0.4.20090113 - New upstream version 20090113, resolving licensing issues. - Use omake to build. - Added a check section to run automated tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-22 09:56:24 EDT --- Set to NEEDINFO of me, to look at when I get back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-22 09:55:43 EDT --- Upstream have added a LICENSE file and also added licensing info to all of the src/* files. I'm just starting a 2 week vacation, so I will have only irregular contact until the beginning of January. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-21 17:08:11 EDT --- Do you think I should just not add the src/* files to the package? They are not (currently) necessary to build anyway. In fact my personal opinion is that the split is ill-advised. I'll raise the issue of licensing upstream now anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-12-21 15:47:12 EDT --- You should prod upstream to get licensing information into all of the source files, not just the top level one. There is no need to extract the license text like that. In fact, my understanding is that you shouldn't do so, especially since you insist on needlessly duplicating this generated license file between the two subpackages. I'll ask the licensing experts for clarification. * source files match upstream (compared manually). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml(Prelude) = bc560abdad61c8ad43c135a42a46cab8 ocaml-preludeml = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 ocaml-preludeml(x86-64) = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 = ocaml(Array) = 9c9fa5f11e2d6992c427dde4d1168489 ocaml(Bigarray) = fc2b6c88ffd318b9f111abe46ba99902 ocaml(Buffer) = 23af67395823b652b807c4ae0b581211 ocaml(Complex) = 73899d718b62e5534e8737bb363dbf71 ocaml(Filename) = 7cd172f02b7ee9b8d7bda3bb92144951 ocaml(Hashtbl) = ee2a3220e38a4350c5bc131ce9f3f6ce ocaml(Int32) = b2545c419b6b6a173cac4c0a3e7e0277 ocaml(Int64) = d501d6e89fdce41c79f274fb464995d5 ocaml(Lexing) = 4d17267334f1a6c75730dc3fae21fb9b ocaml(List) = a0e2e49d266ff302f8667651a43f71ba ocaml(Map) = d6ea0139afe59a16df7b23d35e571de7 ocaml(Marshal) = 02be0525cda0ca38ef8d49584e7769d6 ocaml(Nativeint) = 7233ce5207a538fea4f0c61ed411ea2c ocaml(Netbuffer) = b2846209efee896cd2574779d0d1d42d ocaml(Netchannels) = b370fbc569ce2ec79307482cf4263a41 ocaml(Netdate) = 30913487673f7f8869f808f49a7fcadd ocaml(Obj) = c827f726ce05da709cf7de58fc15e324 ocaml(Pcre) = 4fd7bbc136a5cb4f7df9321ec6092b80 ocaml(Pervasives) = 88cb1505c8bdf9a4dcd2cdf3452732b4 ocaml(Printf) = 807ecd3a1538992580464c03462c9964 ocaml(Random) = 462fc826fd1ae9df8d15e3cb798cba9d ocaml(String) = ecc403546c1c50056801131811c39017 ocaml(Sys) = 21bf525b2b3f3a46a54b96163adfe387 ocaml(Unix) = 0596a58544f8cd88fed5bf5432a53d43 ocaml(runtime) = 3.11.0 ocaml-preludeml-devel-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml-preludeml-devel = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 ocaml-preludeml-devel(x86-64) = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 = ocaml-preludeml = 0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. O license file is duplicated; it should not be, but this is not a blocker. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. * .cmo and .ml files not included * this is a syntax extension, so the .o file os OK in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #327532|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 08:09:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327532) Parallel mandlebrot set An auto-parallelizing mandlebrot set program, which uses this library. Adapted from: http://fhtr.blogspot.com/2008/08/preludeml-some-parallel-combinators.html Compile using: ocamlfind opt -package preludeml -linkpkg mandlebrot.ml -o mandlebrot Run using: ./mandlebrot 5000 test.pgm eog test.pgm (It will auto-detect the number of cores in your system and spread the work across them.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477313] Review Request: ocaml-preludeml - OCaml utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477313 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-12-20 07:58:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-preludeml-0.1-0.2.20080922.fc11.src.rpm Just a tiny change to the META file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
