[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #32 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-09-26 11:14:29 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rmol New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-26 15:38:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.20.0-3.fc11 |0.21.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 00:02:40 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 00:05:24 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.21.0-2.fc9|0.21.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.21.0-2.fc11 |0.21.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 00:12:03 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 20:51:55 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 20:52:56 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 20:53:50 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 00:19:26 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.20.0-3.fc10 |0.20.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-06 19:33:16 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.19.0-1.fc10 |0.20.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Depends on||499003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-04 18:32:31 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-04 18:33:40 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Bug 489233 depends on bug 499003, which changed state. Bug 499003 Summary: Rebuild in devel needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499003 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-15 14:02:09 EDT --- rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.19.0-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-14 12:07:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-14 18:28:12 EDT --- rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Bug 489233 depends on bug 488930, which changed state. Bug 488930 Summary: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package in NO-noarch package with noarch subpackage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488930 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-13 06:26:05 EDT --- * Looks good. * Note though that typically one increases the Release value with every modification of the package (this also aids reviewers who use rpmdev-diff and similar tools). Your upstream tarball has also changed silently without increasing the minor release version. Please avoid this in the future. * If you like to continue with the Fedora Packager sign-up procedure prior to completing the SOCI review, feel free to do so, and I'll approve your account request. $ sha1sum rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz a7ccc0cfb952a63123c7b9fff34ab93ae7b4d619 rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm d29bb310952168a043e104d5dd66feb68d5e1476 rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-04-13 17:35:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rmol Short Description: C++ library of Revenue Management and Optimisation classes and functions Owners: denisarnaud Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-04-13 17:35:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) * If you like to continue with the Fedora Packager sign-up procedure prior to completing the SOCI review, feel free to do so, and I'll approve your account request. I'll go on with the CVS package/module creation request on RMOL. [As for SOCI, I've worked a lot on lately, and I should be able to release a new version this week] Thanks a lot for your valuable support! I really appreciate the time and energy you have already spent on my training. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bugs.mich...@gmx.net Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-04-05 12:05:47 EDT --- Please post where to download the update src.rpm Last was: rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #15 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-04-05 12:46:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) Please post where to download the update src.rpm Last was: rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm It is at the same place (I have replaced the files, as they were not published anywhere else): Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #13 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-04-04 20:19:41 EDT --- All the issues/errors/warnings have been corrected, and I'm waiting for your feedback/approval. Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||488930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #11 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-29 06:43:46 EDT --- I've tested with the new version of rpmlint (version 0.87-1, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488930) on my Fedora 10, and the above warnings have disappeared (so, the fix of rpmlint works for me). All the issues/errors/warnings have been corrected, and I'm waiting for your feedback/approval. Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-29
06:56:20 EDT ---
I have tried to copy html files into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{mydocs}
Yes, %doc implies a copy-operation only for relative paths. For absolute paths
it's an attribute that marks files as being documentation files. To be used by
rpm --query --docfiles ... and --install related --excludedocs/--includedocs
options.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-25
20:16:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Some macros cannot be disabled/commented like this. Here the %configure macro
is still executed twice. Safe is to replace '%' with '#'. [In %changelog, use
double '%%' when referring to macro names.]
Thanks. I was indeed wondering why the configure script was running twice!
So, I have suppressed the commented lines.
%define mydocs __tmp_docdir
%install
...
make install ...
...
rm -rf %{mydocs} mkdir %{mydocs}
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html %{mydocs}
Thanks for those explanations: things appear now clearly. I have tried to copy
html files into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{mydocs} instead of into simply
%{mydocs}, and tried the following two lines in the %files doc part:
%doc %{_datadir}/%{mydocs}/html
%{_datadir}/%{mydocs}/html
but the html directory was then installed (understandably!) into
/usr/share/%{mydocs}, instead of into %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
So, your work around works well as is.
[With that method, one pitfall remains, and that is related to applications
which expect the documentation files in the installed %docdir. One must be
careful not to move the files to a different location that doesn't match with
the paths compiled into the application/program executables.]
For that package (RMOL), it should not be a problem, as the documentation
package is just developer-oriented documentation, not meant to be used by any
of the RMOL applications.
* The following change creates an unowned directory:
-%{_includedir}/%{name}
+%{_includedir}/%{name}/RMOL_Service.hpp
+%{_includedir}/%{name}/RMOL_Types.hpp
I have reverted to:
%{_includedir}/%{name}
(it is more elegant)
* spectool rmol.spec
Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz
Fixed
Tarball in the src.rpm doesn't match your upstream release!
Fixed
In summary, all those issues/errors have been corrected.
But, a new warning has been introduced, due to the BuildArch: noarch
directive in the doc package:
rpmlint rmol.spec
rmol.spec:104: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
rmol.spec:111: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so
rmol.spec:112: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
It may be a bug of rpmlint, as everything else goes as expected: the RPMs are
correctly generated, and they get the right content.
Awaiting for your feedback/approval.
Denis
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-24
11:02:11 EDT ---
* Be careful:
-%configure --enable-static --with-docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
+#%configure --with-docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
+%configure
Some macros cannot be disabled/commented like this. Here the %configure macro
is still executed twice. Safe is to replace '%' with '#'. [In %changelog, use
double '%%' when referring to macro names.]
* The conflict between %doc and the installed html documentation tree still
exists. make install copies the html tree to
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc/rmol-0.19.0/ where it is deleted/overwritten with
your %doc statements. To get the html tree into your -doc subpackage, you add
it from the local build directory. What may seem to work here, breaks with
other packages. You would lose some installed doc files silently. It's not a
blocker, but one way to shoot yourself into the feet.
A common work-around [even when --with-docdir= cannot be redefined to point it
to a temporary directory] is to actually use the installed documentation files
rather the the local ones from the build dir. E.g.
%define mydocs __tmp_docdir
%install
...
make install ...
...
rm -rf %{mydocs} mkdir %{mydocs}
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/* %{mydocs}
%files doc
...
%doc mydocs/*
%doc other files here
That way you can modify/fix the %{mydocs} tree after make install instead of
modifying the extracted source tarball prior to make install. Very convenient
if you ever want to use --short-circuit builds during trouble-shooting.
[With that method, one pitfall remains, and that is related to applications
which expect the documentation files in the installed %docdir. One must be
careful not to move the files to a different location that doesn't match with
the paths compiled into the application/program executables.]
* The following change creates an unowned directory:
-%{_includedir}/%{name}
+%{_includedir}/%{name}/RMOL_Service.hpp
+%{_includedir}/%{name}/RMOL_Types.hpp
%dir %{_includedir}/%{name} is necessary to fix that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
/usr/share/aclocal/rmol.m4
I think it is acceptable not to Requires: automake just for this directory --
as long as the guidelines don't force packagers to do it:
| MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
| not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package
| which does create that directory
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
* spectool rmol.spec
Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz
- ERROR 404: Not Found.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0.tar.gz
- would work
Tarball in the src.rpm doesn't match your upstream release!
* Scratch-build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1256538
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #8 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-23 13:06:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) So, the issue 1. of comment #6 is still open. That one has been corrected as well, thanks to a BuildArch: noarch macro in the doc package section. The files (rmol.spec and rmol-*.src.rpm) will be shortly updated on the SourceForge download site. I am thus waiting for your feedback and/or approval. Thanks in advance Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #5 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-22 21:01:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Thanks a lot! I eventually have integrated all those changes, and the updated packages are as follows: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.19.0-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-22
21:32:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
1. Currently, a doc package is generated for every architecture (i386, x86_64,
etc.). How can we generate only one noarch RPM for the documentation? (I have
not found that in the FedoraProject documentation).
2. Besides, still for the generation of the doc package, I had to copy the
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html content to
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/html, as %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} is
deleted (after the installation and) just before the content can be copied into
that directory. I have looked into several other Fedora packages (dbus, xerces,
cppunit), but could not find another elegant way to copy the HTML documentation
into /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/html .
Thanks in advance
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-22
22:10:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
2. Besides, still for the generation of the doc package, I had to copy the
%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html content to
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/html, as %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} is
deleted (after the installation and) just before the content can be copied
into
that directory. I have looked into several other Fedora packages (dbus,
xerces,
cppunit), but could not find another elegant way to copy the HTML
documentation
into /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/html .
I eventually found a way to do it elegantly, and updated all the files
(rmol.spec and rmol-*src.rpm) accordingly. I just added the doc/html directory
to the %doc macro of the doc package (and removed all the directory copies).
So, the issue 1. of comment #6 is still open.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-09
07:33:48 EDT ---
It's likely that I've caught all issues with this package, but overall the
package needs quite a lot of work:
* Run rpmlint on the src.rpm and built rpms. Pay extra attention to all
warnings about executable files.
* The %doc file INSTALL is irrelevant to RPM package users.
BuildRequires: automake, autoconf, libtool
These are not used and therefore not required.
%configure --enable-static
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/librmol.a
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/librmol.la
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
* The documentation is completely mispackaged for several reasons.
1) In the build.log:
checking for doxygen... no
[...]
- html-doc .. : no
[...]
- doxygen ... : no
2) The chosen Group: System Environment/Libraries for the subpackage is
wrong. Should be Group: Documentation.
3) You configure --with-docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} which conflicts
with the %doc macro, because %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} is emptied before
any local %doc files are placed in it. Display the contents of your -html-doc
subpackage to see.
4) There are NamingGUidelines for documentation subpackages:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingNamingGuidelines#Documentation_SubPackages
* There are guidelines with examples for several types of RPM spec scriptlets.
Please update your %post and %preun scriptlets:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo
* The -devel subpackage ought to Requires: pkgconfig as it places a file in
%_libdir/pkgconfig/
%{_datadir}/man/man3/%{name}.3.gz
%{_datadir}/man/man1/%{name}-config.1.gz
Use %{_mandir} instead of %_datadir/man and '*' instead of '.gz' as the
compression method chosen by rpmbuild may change.
%{_datadir}/info/%{name}-ref.info.gz
* Use %{_infodir} instead of %{_datadir}/info and '*' instead of '.gz' as the
compression method chosen by rpmbuild may change.
* Empty lines between %changelog comments increase readability. There are
guidelines on how to include the package version-release in the %changelog:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
* The /usr/bin/rmol-config script does questionable things:
$ rmol-config --libs
-lgsl -lgslcblas -lm -L/usr/lib -lrmol
1) Explicitly linking against libgsl* is not necessary (only for static
builds!). You would need Requires: gsl-devel in the -devel package for this
to work at all. And the pkgconfig file does not depend on gsl either, which is
correct.
2) libm typically is linked implicitly by GCC.
3) -L/usr/lib is bad as /usr/lib is standard search-path already, so what this
does is to override user-defined search-path with standard search-path.
$ rmol-config --cflags
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include
Same as 3) above. What this does is to override user's search-path for headers
with standard search-path for headers.
$ rmol-config --cflags-debug
-I/usr/include -I/usr/include
Hmm? Not even -g is set here.
/usr/include/rmol/config.h
This is an internal header file that is not part of the API and should not be
distributed as it causes bad side-effects.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org Version|rawhide |10 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-03-08 18:45:41 EDT
---
I haven't done a full review, but here are a couple of comments:
Please don't define %version and %release like that; if you have
Version: 0.18.0
then %version is automatically defined for you to 0.18.0.
LGPL is not a valid license tag in Fedora. Please see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. I did not look at the source to see
the license in use, but if it's LGPL version 2 or later, use LGPLv2+.
Please do not use the Vendor or Distribution tags.
0.dev.1 is not a valid value for the Release tag. If the package is a released
tarball with version 0.18.0, use a positive integer for the release tag with
%{?dist} appended. (Use of the dist tag is not mandatory but is recommended
unless you are experienced with Fedora packaging and understand how to manage
proper upgrade paths.) If 0.18.0 has not been released and you're a using some
sort of snapshot leading up to that release then other formats are allowable.
Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines for the
full details.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-08 19:53:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) The corrected files (RPM specification file and the corresponding source RPM) are available as per the following: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.18.0-0.dev.1.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-03-08 19:59:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) The corrected files (RPM specification file and the corresponding source RPM) are available as per the following: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol.spec?use_mirror=ovh SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rmol/rmol-0.18.0-1.fc10.src.rpm?use_mirror=ovh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
