[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-15 22:14:20 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc10|0.9.7-4.fc11




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-02 10:27:25 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc9 |0.9.7-4.fc10




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||0.9.7-4.fc9
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-02 10:25:43 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-20 19:52:30 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5228

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-20 19:59:24 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5260

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-20 19:54:49 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5243

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Rolf Fokkens rolf.fokk...@wanadoo.nl changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rolf.fokk...@wanadoo.nl




--- Comment #32 from Rolf Fokkens rolf.fokk...@wanadoo.nl  2009-05-19 
17:57:00 EDT ---
I needed undionly.kpxe to make a server do an iSCSI boot, as described in
http://www.etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining.

AFAIK this file isn't part if the compiled packages, I took it from the
rpmbuild after building the binary packages from sources. I'd suggest to
include the undionly.kpxe in one of the binary packages if it actually isn't in
one of them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #33 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-05-19 18:28:01 
EDT ---
Thanks for catching that Rolf.  Building in koji now, with undionly.kpxe now
included in the -bootimgs subpackage.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364843

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-19 19:41:18 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-19 20:25:30 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 10:16:34 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 10:15:58 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 10:15:27 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 20:27:16 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4900

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 20:27:22 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4901

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-05-12 20:30:07 EDT ---
gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4920

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|srinivas_ramana...@dell.com
   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-05-09 16:50:26 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #23 from srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com  2009-05-08 
02:26:22 EDT ---
Setting fedora-review flag to +.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #24 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-05-08 08:07:10 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: gpxe
Short Description: A network boot loader
Owners: mdomsch glommer
Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 EL-5
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #22 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gco...@redhat.com  2009-04-14 
08:44:31 EDT ---
Of course here are ppc and ppc64 packages. They are just not built there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW




--- Comment #19 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-04-12 
02:31:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)

you should run rpmlint against rpm files, example


[ita...@itamar gpxe]$ ls *.rpm
gpxe-0.9.7-1.src.rpm  gpxe-bootimgs-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm 
gpxe-roms-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm  gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm


[ita...@itamar gpxe]$ rpmlint *.rpm
gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10)
gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD,
floppy images and GRUB format
gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format
gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by
QEMU, .rom format
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.


the warning about summary-not-capitalized can be ignored

so please fix the warning about mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




--- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-04-12 
02:37:50 EDT ---
for the there are something wrong with this package.

since there are no rpms for PPC and PPC64, why not use 

ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64


?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #21 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-04-12 12:45:52 
EDT ---
Honestly folks, we're getting a bit pedantic with  the tabs vs spaces warning. 
I didn't rebuild the RPMs after fixing that just to run rpmlint to prove that I
can run 'tr' to remove tabs.  Running rpmlint against the spec file is
sufficient to see that I fixed those.

Regarding exclusivearch - these ROMs run either on a physical machine where
exclusivearch would make sense, or can be run inside QEMU on a completely
different arch, where the RPM architecture makes no sense whatsoever (hence
they're noarch).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #18 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-04-09 18:42:14 
EDT ---
OK, I fixed the two rpmlint warnings.

$ rpmlint gpxe.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Please approve.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Flag||needinfo?(matt_dom...@dell.
   ||com)




--- Comment #15 from srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com  2009-04-07 
08:07:20 EDT ---
Review:

Fix all rpmlint warnings:

[r...@localhost ~]# rpmlint gpxe-*
gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 10)
gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD,
floppy images and GRUB format
gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format
gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by
QEMU, .rom format

naming: ok
spec file name matches: ok
license = GPLv2 and BSD: ok
license tag: ok
spec in english: ok
spec legible: ok
no prebuild binaries: ok
no packager, vendor, copyright, tags: ok
summary and description tags: ok
no rpaths: ok
no config files: ok
no initscripts: ok
no desktop files: ok
consistent use of macros: ok
no makeinstall: ok
no lang files: ok
scriptlets: ok
no conditional deps: ok
builds with a normal user account: ok
not relocatable: ok
code, not content: ok
directory ownership: ok
users and groups: ok
not a web app: ok
conflicts: ok
no kmods: ok
no files under /srv: ok
source matches: ok
calls ldconfig appropriately: ok
no duplicate files: ok
file permissions: ok
libtool archives removed: ok
%clean section: ok
no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok
%doc usage ok
no static libs: ok
no pkgconfig files: ok
all libtool .la files removed: ok
dir ownership correct: ok
%install does rm: ok
filenames UTF8: ok

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-04-07 
10:18:35 EDT ---
look at

comment #1

and

comment #2

may be missing obsolete etherboot

?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(matt_dom...@dell. |
   |com)|




--- Comment #17 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-04-07 12:28:24 
EDT ---
I don't know that it obsoletes etherboot in the RPM sense.  The two can
co-exist, and presumably one could load an etherboot orom into one instance of
QEMU, while loading a gPXE orom into another instance.  Also, the other
etherboot images and gPXE images, meant for use on cards etc, can absolutely
co-exist.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #14 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-04-06 10:57:13 
EDT ---
I'm uploading the spec and srpm which match the last koji scratch build, into
http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-04-01 18:06:15 
EDT ---
Where's the latest package with those changes applied?  I only see the 0.9.7-1
spec from comment #5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-04-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-04-01 
18:16:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
 Where's the latest package with those changes applied?  I only see the 0.9.7-1
 spec from comment #5.  

I belive in koji, until the next cleanup.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-03-26 12:01:48 EDT 
---
And a few more updates:
* add subpackage gpxe-bootimgs containing ISO, USB, and floppy images
* add BRs needed for generating the above images
* add USAGE doc for above images
* change Source0 to point at released tarballs, not git

Built in mock, logs and results at http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-03-26 
12:25:04 EDT ---
why you don't include dist-tag ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-03-26 
12:27:16 EDT ---
Can you include a koji scratch build in dist-f11 ?

-make %{?_smp_mflags}
+make %{?_smp_mflags} ISOLINUX_BIN=/usr/share/syslinux/isolinux.bin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-03-26 12:52:42 EDT 
---
Itamar: re no dist tag: the executables being produced run in BIOS context, not
OS distribution context.  There's no reason we couldn't use the same noarch
(x86) executables across multiple OS versions.

Koji scratch-build started:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259845

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-03-26 
12:58:29 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=336850)
 -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336850)
patch to build in koji

look

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #11 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-03-26 13:18:16 
EDT ---
Gotcha.  Applied those changes, thanks!
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259897
built successfully.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||457979




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181


Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br




--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br  2009-03-25 
15:04:46 EDT ---
I have a question,

this package will obsolete etherboot ?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6998

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #2 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gco...@redhat.com  2009-03-25 
15:24:45 EDT ---
Yes, sir.
Provided everything moves according to the plan.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #3 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gco...@redhat.com  2009-03-25 
15:29:57 EDT ---
1: Now that we don't have a kvm package anymore, the subpackage should be
really called roms-qemu, not roms-kvm

2: Why git? Doesn't gpxe have a fresh enough release?

3: ExclusiveArch:  %{ix86} x86_64 = this is wrong. It means ppc and others
will never get the noarch subpackages. Take a look on how extboot does it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-03-25 16:02:24 EDT 
---
1) good catch, will change
2) upstream doesn't release tarballs.  I'm OK using the v0.9.7 tag if we don't
need any diffs since then.
3) will investigate

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181





--- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com  2009-03-25 17:00:43 EDT 
---
Updated files with changes suggested in comment #3.
http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe.spec
http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe-0.9.7-1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review