[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-06-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-06-04 04:16:07 EDT 
---
APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-06-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #18 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-06-04 04:37:56 EDT 
---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: mysqludf_xql
Short Description: MySQL UDF library for XML output
Owners: yaneti
Branches: F-10 F-11
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-06-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-06-04 11:36:25 
EDT ---
CVS done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-06-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #20 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-06-04 13:14:50 EDT 
---
Thanks everyone for the review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)  |




--- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-06-03 
14:14:44 EDT ---
Lubomir, if you think there is no blocker for this
review request, please feel free to approve this ticket.

Removing NEEDSPONSOR as I am now sponsoring the submitter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #15 from arthurguru arthurg.w...@gmail.com  2009-05-15 02:46:53 
EDT ---
Hi Yanko,

Just did another informal review of mysqludf_xql.

All went well.

Best regards,
Arthur Gouros.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-05-09 05:28:57 EDT 
---
Thanks. I like the package and am eventually going approve it. You need to get
sponsored in order to import and maintain it.

In meanwhile, it would be awesome if you could do a couple of informal reviews
similar to what arthur has done here. That's usually done to show that you're
familiar with the packaging guidelines and are comfortable with RPM packaging.
I'll sponsor you then.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-05-09 
09:03:37 EDT ---
Well, I still don't understand why ldconfig is needed
here because lib_mysqludf_xql.so does not seem to be
a library.

On F-11, without ldconfig:
--
[r...@localhost ~]# service mysqld start
MySQL を起動中:[  OK  ]
[r...@localhost ~]# ls -al /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so 
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20764 2009-05-09 21:38
/usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so
[r...@localhost ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info
RETURNS STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
ERROR 1126 (HY000) at line 1: Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_xql.so'
(errno: 22 /usr/lib/mysql/plugin/lib_mysqludf_xql.so: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory)
[r...@localhost ~]# mv /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so
/usr/lib/mysql/plugin/
[r...@localhost ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info
RETURNS STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
[r...@localhost ~]#
--

So on F-11, installing lib_mysqludf_xql.so under %_libdir/mysql/plugin
work without ldconfig. Are there any possibility that installing
lib_mysqludf_xql.so should be installed under somewhere else
even on F-10?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #14 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-09 10:49:49 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #13)
 Well, I still don't understand why ldconfig is needed

 So on F-11, installing lib_mysqludf_xql.so under %_libdir/mysql/plugin
 work without ldconfig. Are there any possibility that installing
 lib_mysqludf_xql.so should be installed under somewhere else
 even on F-10?  

That is
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/udf-compiling.html
vs
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/udf-compiling.html

I consider the submission fine as is. For F11 myplugdir can become
%{_libdir}/mysql/plugin/ and the post and postun can be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-08 02:37:16 EDT 
---
It should be noted that the mysql version (5.1.x) in devel/F11 seems to require
these extension libs in a specific location %{_libdir}/mysql/plugin/ and does
not work if the library is only in the system linker path. This submission
remains on the stable branch for now.

* Fri May  8 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-8
- use a define for the plugin location, 
  it changes from mysql 5.0 [F10] to 5.1 [F11]

http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lkund...@v3.sk
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-05-08 04:21:22 EDT ---
Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a
shared object.

rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
Why do you call a recursive rm here?
Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
--disable-static to configure?

Also, please do some informal reviews to prove you're familiar with the
packaging guidelines so that your account can get sponsored.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-08 08:06:37 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just 
 a
 shared object.

Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig):
# service mysqld start
Starting MySQL:[  OK  ]
[r...@f10test ~]# rpm -Uhv
/home/rpmbuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.i386.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
   1:mysqludf_xql   ### [100%]
[r...@f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS
STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
ERROR 1126 (HY000) at line 1: Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_xql.so'
(errno: 22 lib_mysqludf_xql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory)
[r...@f10test ~]# ldconfig 
[r...@f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS
STRING SONAME lib_mysqludf_xql.so;'
[r...@f10test ~]# 


 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
 Why do you call a recursive rm here?

Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r  can be removed.

 Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
 --disable-static to configure?

not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage.
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
   /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-05-08 16:14:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
 (In reply to comment #7)
  Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, 
  just a
  shared object.
 
 Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig):

Sorry, I did not notice it uses ld.so.conf.d.

  rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la}
  Why do you call a recursive rm here?
 
 Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r  can be removed.
 
  Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
  --disable-static to configure?
 
 not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage.
 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la  

1.) .la is not a static library
2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no
reason at all

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-08 16:37:03 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #9)
 (In reply to comment #8)
  (In reply to comment #7)

   Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing
   --disable-static to configure?
  
  not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage.
  error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
 /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la  
 
 1.) .la is not a static library
 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no
 reason at all  

What I meant was that between having both a --disable-static and a rm line and
having just a rm line I'd prefer the latter. Seems like less clutter to me.
Of course a few cycles and disk accesses making the static lib could be spared
but imho its hardly worth it. Anyway, if this ever gets to the repo I'll put in
the --disable-static.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #11 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-08 17:00:27 EDT 
---
* Fri May  8 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-9
- use --disable-static

http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-9.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


arthurguru arthurg.w...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||arthurg.w...@gmail.com




--- Comment #4 from arthurguru arthurg.w...@gmail.com  2009-05-07 20:00:56 
EDT ---
Yanko,

Here is my informal review of package mysqludf_xql
One issue I couldn't determine either way is whether this should be a -devel
package or not.

MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the
review.
- mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.src.rpm OK
- mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.i386.rpm OK
- mysqludf_xql-debuginfo-0.9.7-6.fc10.i386.rpm OK
- OK

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
- OK

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
- OK

MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
- OK

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
- OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
- OK

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc
- OK

MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- OK

MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
- OK

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
- ac690468d8303ea5e09fcf7d29326b22 *lib_mysqludf_xql-0.9.7.tar.gz (RPM)
- ac690468d8303ea5e09fcf7d29326b22 *lib_mysqludf_xql-0.9.7.tar.gz (upstream)
- OK

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
- OK (i386)

MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture
- OK

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
- OK

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
- OK, no locales available

MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
- OK

MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
- OK, no relocatable package

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- OK

MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
- OK

MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
- OK

MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- OK

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
- OK

MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
- OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
- OK, no large documentation

MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application.
- OK

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
- OK, no header files

MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
- OK, no static libraries

MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability).
- OK, no .pc files

MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
- OK, no suffixed library files.

MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
- OK if not -devel package, otherwise %{name} = %{version}-%{release} is not
specified.

MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
- OK, no .la files

MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file
- OK, no gui available

MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
- OK

MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- OK

MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
- OK

SHOULD - All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment
- Not Ok, No comment provided.

Conclusion:
It's hard to say whether SQL queries are a devel activity or not, if a not a
devel package then this package has passed my review.

Kind regards,
Arthur Gouros.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-05-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-05-07 21:13:34 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #4)
 One issue I couldn't determine either way is whether this should be a -devel
 package or not.

I don't think its a -devel package. Its more like a mysql plugin, which is a
runtime, not a devel thing.


 SHOULD - All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment
 - Not Ok, No comment provided.

Redid it without patching.

* Fri May  8 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-7
- avoid patching and reconfiguring

http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-7.fc10.src.rpm 


Thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-04-19 03:10:04 EDT 
---
* Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-5
- file EOL encoding for some docs

http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-5.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986


Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-04-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-04-19 04:13:42 EDT 
---
* Sun Apr 19 2009 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com - 0.9.7-6
- ldconfig also in postun
- remove explicit gcc-c++

http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986





--- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com  2009-04-15 09:41:05 EDT 
---
new version
SRPM URL:
http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-4.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review