[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||atork...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-05-31 05:09:34 EDT --- *** Bug 451619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-15 12:10:29 EDT --- This seems to be merged, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #341662|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 09:33:34 EDT --- Benjamin, can you please look at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/jakub/task_1338267/ and say if that's what you want or not? If so, I'll do a real build soon. All I found so far is that I need to remove all *~ files from the html directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-05-05 14:35:21 EDT --- Ping. Can this get merged into the gcc-4.4.0 rpms on the next respin please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-29 14:13:22 EDT --- Jakub, I've done this both ways: as maintainer of gcc.spec, can you pick what you want? My suggestion is to mod libstdc++-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-28 18:20:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341660) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341660) patch 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-28 18:21:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341662) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341662) gcc.spec file with libstdc++-devel doc enhancements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-28 18:20:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341661) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341661) patch 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-28 18:19:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341659) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341659) gcc.spec patch for libstdc++-devel doc enhancements This plus the small patches also attached will generate the doxygen html and man pages for libstdc++-devel. This is configurable via the build_libstdcxx_docs switch in gcc.spec. This seems like the way to go, all is ok except that the man pages are not installed in /user/share/man/* but instead in /user/share/docs/libstdc++-devel/. Not quite sure what is going on there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-24 14:31:46 EDT --- I've updated this here: http://people.redhat.com/bkoz/documentation/ This adds the man packages. This essentially duplicates some of the libstdc++-devel package (html), and so should probably be integrated into that. Jakub, your call. Here are the dependencies: 1) for api html docs: doxygen, graphviz 2) for manual html docs: libxslt, libxml2, docbook-style-xsl 3) for manual pdf: prince, msttfonts To eliminate the deps for 2, use the pre-generated libstdc++-v3/doc/html directory in the gcc sources. To eliminate the deps for 1, use the pre-generated files on gcc.gnu.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-23 02:38:29
EDT ---
- The lines
Obsoletes: libstdc++-docs = 4.3.0
Provides: libstdc++-docs = %{version}-%{release}
since they are redundant.
- Please remove the empty %check section.
- Use %{version} in the Source lines and in the %{build} phase.
Once you have added the man pages, I will perform the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com 2009-04-23 02:43:20 EDT --- Isn't all this generated from gcc sources? What is needed to generate it? Just doxygen? If yes I'd say it would be better to ship this as subpackages of gcc, guarded by some spec macro that those who initially bootstrap gcc in a rpm based distro could turn off, so that gcc build doesn't require doxyen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-23 03:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Isn't all this generated from gcc sources? What is needed to generate it? Just doxygen? If yes I'd say it would be better to ship this as subpackages of gcc, guarded by some spec macro that those who initially bootstrap gcc in a rpm based distro could turn off, so that gcc build doesn't require doxyen. Yeah, this package should be part of the gcc package, since libstdc++ is also generated in the gcc srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 20:39:27 EDT --- The man pages could be added to this. These are the man pages: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/libstdc++/doxygen/libstdc++-man.4.4.0.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
