[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-18 22:01:02 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-18 22:13:32 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc9 |0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-18 22:13:19 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-11 23:54:38 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 00:00:28 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 00:02:52 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 09:16:59 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 09:16:39 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-09 09:16:26 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fab...@bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fab...@bernewireless.net Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214
Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-05-06
14:50:38 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Package:
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture
Tested on: F10/i386
[x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
[...@laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Binary RPM(s):
[...@laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint gcolor2*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is not relocatable
[x] Buildroot is correct
master : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
License type: GPLv2
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL
Upstream source: 223a126b8a87234d1552be4be4140789
Build source:223a126b8a87234d1552be4be4140789
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales
[x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured
[x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
[x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files
[x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every
%files section
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x] Package consistently uses macros
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content
[x] Included filenames are in UTF-8
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required
[-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present
[-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete
[x] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI
application
[x] Follows desktop entry spec
[x] Valid .desktop Name
[x] Valid .desktop GenericName
[x] Valid .desktop Categories
[-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
[x] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install
[x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
[x] Latest version is packaged
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
Tested on: F10/i386
[x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339014
[x] Package functions as described
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct
[-] File based requires are sane
[x] Changelog in allowed format
I see no further blocker, package APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-05-06 15:06:27 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gcolor2 Short Description: Simple color selector for GTK+2 Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-06 17:16:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
