[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-02 23:39:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mastah...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Michael Stahnke 2009-11-02 23:16:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: 389-adminutil Short Description: Utility library for 389 administration Owners: stahnma Branches: EL4, EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-17 17:15:48 EDT --- cvs import done - built in koji - all branches imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-07-17 16:39:14 EDT --- rpmlint is not quiet but i think its ok. it would be good to get the exit calls removed from the shared libraries 389-adminutil-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. sha256sum matches upstream f5872d644971f51e45d402d3a913d2b0b1c4575122fb849bde5048fecd9f6872 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 f5872d644971f51e45d402d3a913d2b0b1c4575122fb849bde5048fecd9f6872 /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 obsoletes/provides is sane and makes sure that the old version are removed. builds fine in mock approved sorry pasted the 389-ds-console review in here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-07-17 16:40:43 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-17 16:19:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: 389-adminutil Short Description: Utility library for 389 administration Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-07-17 16:11:33 EDT --- rpmlint is quiet sha256sums of upstream tarball and whats in the srpm match e442f7d538258d7b3cbd88d1fcfa0ad28e0716a8d8428efaa7b9af58c99d6529 389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 e442f7d538258d7b3cbd88d1fcfa0ad28e0716a8d8428efaa7b9af58c99d6529 /home/dennis//fedora/SOURCES/389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 obsoletes/provides is sane and replaces the old version Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-17 16:00:04 EDT --- Moved Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-adminutil-1.1.8-2.src.rpm Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|den...@ausil.us Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-11 03:35:23 EDT --- Who are you pinging? Nobody is assigned to review this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #6 from Rich Megginson 2009-07-10 11:19:35 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:18:19 EDT --- This package is used by 389-admin and 389-dsgw - even though those packages are approved, this one is not, and so will definitely complicate matters. What can I do to speed up the review for this package? I will not be able to release the 389 suite without this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||500746(389-admin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||501393(389-dsgw) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:19:23 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:23:18 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-18 15:57:21 EDT --- Updated Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 e84240547e2f7b97d0576bcb85c06a57 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 17581245a0d95b3f7cda90c3ed83b7984afe9b2c 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 I would like to waive or otherwise accept the rpmlint results. This is the output I get from rpmlint - same results with both rpmlint 0.85 and 0.87 on Fedora 10 389-adminutil.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.0 389-adminutil.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.0 This is ok - these are functions specifically for handling fatal errors on behalf of the calling application. 389-adminutil-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The devel package has no documentation - it's all in the base package rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-adminutil-1.1.8-2.fc10.src.rpm 389-adminutil.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure where the other errors are coming from. I do know that libadminutil does not strictly need to link directly against ssl, nss, ssldap60, or ldif60 - but all applications that want to support SSL (which is all of them) will need to also link with libadmsslutil which does require the SSL libs. ldif60 is not strictly needed but it doesn't hurt to link with it. The ICU dependencies are required to link with ICU even though rpmlint says they are not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Felix Kaechele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fe...@fetzig.org --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-14 01:20:28 EDT --- rpmlint is pretty verbose on this: [fe...@polaris result]$ rpmlint *.rpm 389-adminutil 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 389-adminutil-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /lib64/libssl3.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /lib64/libnss3.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libldif60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 e...@glibc_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libldif60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.40 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shai...@redhat.com Alias||389-adminutil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
