[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|panem...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 Bug 503591 depends on bug 503592, which changed state. Bug 503592 Summary: Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||503592, 503590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-21 17:11:03 EDT --- Maybe I'm missing something, but how come this blocks 468230 (TG2 review) if it is built _on top of_ TG ? Shouldn't 468230 be in "Depends on" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Nils Philippsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nphil...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:48:51 EDT --- According to the spec files, neither TurboGears2 nor python-catwalk requires or build requires the other package. Okay if I remove python-catwalk blocking TG2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co | |m), | |needinfo?(lmac...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-09-25 14:29:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > According to the spec files, neither TurboGears2 nor python-catwalk requires > or > build requires the other package. Okay if I remove python-catwalk blocking > TG2? python-tg-devtools contains the `paster quickstart` command that spits out TG2 apps, which does require python-catwalk. So this shouldn't block TG2, but python-tg-devtools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ape...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591
Alan Pevec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 13:30:14 EDT ---
Here is the review:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm:
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
python-catwalk.noarch: W: no-documentation
=> upstream tarball doesn't include documentation either
python-catwalk.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/catwalk/tg2/test/lib/base.py
python-catwalk.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/catwalk/tg2/test/lib/helpers.py
=> these are present in the upstream source tarball
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
These errors and warning are not blockers.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
e301fad3aa9c0888f9ff03b9f556bf46 Catwalk-2.0.2.tar.gz
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
[n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro.
[n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not
just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig
in %post and %postun.
[n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[n/a] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[n/a] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
[n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2009-09-28 14:15:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-catwalk Short Description: A way to view your models using TurboGears Owners: lmacken toshio Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:55:08 EDT --- cvs done (with F-12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Bug 503591 depends on bug 503590, which changed state. Bug 503590 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-09-30 16:06:57 EDT --- Built in rawhide, waiting on python-sprox to hit stable for EL-5, and F12 is locked so we'll need to go through releng for that branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-01 10:04:29 EDT --- python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.0.2-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-03 15:00:44 EDT --- python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
