[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|505154  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-24 15:26:46 EDT ---
healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||0.9.6.1-3.fc10
 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE  |ERRATA




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-24 15:42:43 EDT ---
healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.9.6.1-3.fc10  |0.9.6.1-3.fc11




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-18 04:23:53 
EDT ---
- The COPYING file actually belongs to healpix c++, but it doesn't matter since
both are gpl.

Everything seems to be fixed now, so the package is


APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #19 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-18 11:18:03 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: healpy
Short Description: A python wrapper of the healpix library
Owners: jsmidt
Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu  2009-06-18 16:25:27 
EDT ---
CVS done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-18 19:12:29 EDT ---
healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-06-18 19:31:41 EDT ---
healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-17 15:41:03 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
  MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
  NEEDSWORK
  - This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy.
 
 Sorry, I didn't know this is a hard rule since the python modules it depends
 on, numpy, scipy and pyfits don't follow it. 
 
 However fixed: Done.

*whoops*

I though the guideline was that the name must begin with python- if it doesn't
start with py, but actually it is If the upstream source has py (or Py) in
its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for example, pygtk is
acceptable.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29

So the name should be after all just healpy. Sorry for the mixup :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-17 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #17 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-17 18:23:50 
EDT ---


 
 So the name should be after all just healpy. Sorry for the mixup :)  


Okay, name changed back.

The new files are again at:
Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #14 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-16 22:57:20 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
 rpmlint output:
 healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.so 0775
 healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.so 0775
 healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
 /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.so 0775
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
 
 - Fix the permissions, they should be 755.
 

This is so weird.  On my system they are 755 so rpmlint isn't complaining. 
However, I have forced them to by 755 so Done.



 MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 NEEDSWORK
 - This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy.

Sorry, I didn't know this is a hard rule since the python modules it depends
on, numpy, scipy and pyfits don't follow it. 

However fixed: Done.



 SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
 upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
 - License file is still missing.

It turns out the COPYING file is in the directory containinh Healpix-c++ which
I was deleting.  It is now copied to %%doc.  Done

The new files are again at:
Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/python-healpy-0.9.6.1-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #15 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-16 23:02:08 
EDT ---
Sorry, here is the spec file: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/python-healpy.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-13 05:19:40 
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.so 0775
healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.so 0775
healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.so 0775
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.

- Fix the permissions, they should be 755.


MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
NEEDSWORK
- This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy.

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
- Remember to change this as well.

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- GPLv2+ license headers are now present and correctly picked up by
licensecheck.pl
- The test file test/test_fit_dipole.py is still missing a license. This is not
a problem per se, since the license of the package is already clear from the
other files.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A

MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Add ChangeLog and test/test_fit_dipole.py to %doc.

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK

SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK
- License file is still missing.

SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #12 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-13 00:01:24 
EDT ---
The upstream Author made a new version with GPLv2 headers in the source files.

I have added the gcc and g++ build flags.  I have taken upstream's minimum
package dependency versions recommendations and added them to the spec file.

This package builds successfully  on all platforms for Fedora 10 and 11 using
Koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409599
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409604

There are is no rpmlint warnings or errors on my Fedora 11 system.

The new files are again at:
Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||505154




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-09 03:18:25 
EDT ---

 - The package *does not contain any license statement at all*. It cannot go in
 until you get upstream to put the license in the tarball, the order of
 preference is

I have contacted upstream.  I will let you know when the License has been
properly included.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-08 05:12:24 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 (In reply to comment #5)
   BuildRequires: healpix-c++
   BuildRequires: cfitsio
  is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages).
 
 I meant:
 
 Requires: healpix-c++
 Requires: cfitsio
 
so I believe this is now fixed.

Nope, that is in collision with
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires

Also, you really should increment the release tag every time you make a new
revision. Not incrementing it makes it harder for me to keep track of what has
been done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-08 05:17:14 
EDT ---
Also, the package does not build in mock. You need at least BR: numpy, maybe
you need also the other python packages as BR.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #9 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-08 19:00:34 
EDT ---
Thanks for all your patience with this review.  I have fixed the issues you
mentioned and now the package builds in mock.


The new files are again at:
Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-09 01:48:46 
EDT ---
Well, this should be Release 4, since:

-1 was initial release
-2 was build against healpix-c++ and cfitsio instead of the bundled ones
-3 was removing bundled healpix and cfitsio altogether and changing duplicated
BR:s into R:s
-4 dropping the extra R:s

**

- You should probably
 %build
 export CFLAGS=%{optflags} -fopenmp
to enable threading support.

- g++ flags are not used. This needs to be fixed.

- The package *does not contain any license statement at all*. It cannot go in
until you get upstream to put the license in the tarball, the order of
preference is
1. source code headers stating the file(s) are under GPLv2+
2. COPYING stating healpy is under GPLv2+
3. plain GPLv(N) COPYING file, which means that code is under GPL+.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-07 03:34:42 
EDT ---
- The BRs are incorrect.
 BuildRequires: python
should be
 BuildRequires: python-devel
and
 BuildRequires: gcc-c++
can be safely dropped (it's in the default buildroot).

?? The package uses BOTH python_sitearch AND python_sitelib?? (Are you building
on x86, then these will point to the same place?)

- Why on Earth do you
 mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
 mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/data
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/data
as this will probably break functionality..?

- As the Healpix C++ package is included in the distribution, you need to find
a way to remove it and use healpix-c++-devel instead.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #3 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-07 11:53:58 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
 - The BRs are incorrect.
  BuildRequires: python
 should be
  BuildRequires: python-devel

Sorry if I made a mistake here, but the packaging guidelines for Python state
to use python, not python-devel:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python


 ?? The package uses BOTH python_sitearch AND python_sitelib?? (Are you 
 building
 on x86, then these will point to the same place?)

Again, sorry if this was a mistake, this package has C/C++ libraries and the
above guidelines seem to suggest you use python_sitelib for normal Python
modules and python_sitearch for libraries (like those written in C).

I've never dealt with a Python program with these kind of libraries before so I
got confused.

 
 - Why on Earth do you
  mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
  mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/data
 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/data
 as this will probably break functionality..?
 

Because they are just example .fits files.  However, I will put them back. 

 - As the Healpix C++ package is included in the distribution, you need to find
 a way to remove it and use healpix-c++-devel instead.  

Okay, I will do this and the other things.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #4 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-07 17:13:55 
EDT ---
Okay, first of all I forgot to thank you for the review.  

I've patched the source so it doesn't build the Healpix-c++ package and also so
that it links against the healpix-c++ and cfitsio libraries already in Fedora.

I also think I have corrected the other mistakes you mentioned, unless I
misunderstood.  Thanks again.  The new files are here with no change to
rpmlint.

Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi  2009-06-07 18:17:25 
EDT ---
- You have
 BuildRequires: healpix-c++-devel
 BuildRequires: cfitsio-devel
so
 BuildRequires: healpix-c++
 BuildRequires: cfitsio
is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages).

- You are not building in %build. Use
 python setup.py build
in %build and
 python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} 
in %install.

- Without looking at its contents, INSTALL shouldn't probably be in %doc (if
its only contents is instructions for installation from source, then it
shouldn't be included).

- You must in any case own the directory
 %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/
so you can drop the three last lines from the %files section.

- Add comment about the patch. Also, you could remove the internal healpix and
cfitsio libraries from the extracted tarball in the setup phase so that one can
be sure that they are not used instead of the Fedora packages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430





--- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com  2009-06-07 20:00:27 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 - You have
  BuildRequires: healpix-c++-devel
  BuildRequires: cfitsio-devel
 so
  BuildRequires: healpix-c++
  BuildRequires: cfitsio
 is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages).
 

I meant:

Requires: healpix-c++
Requires: cfitsio

   so I believe this is now fixed.


 - You are not building in %build. Use
  python setup.py build
 in %build and
  python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} 
 in %install.

Done

 
 - Without looking at its contents, INSTALL shouldn't probably be in %doc (if
 its only contents is instructions for installation from source, then it
 shouldn't be included).


Done

 - You must in any case own the directory
  %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/
 so you can drop the three last lines from the %files section.
 

Done.  I believe I did what you meant.

 - Add comment about the patch. 

Done.

 Also, you could remove the internal healpix and
 cfitsio libraries from the extracted tarball in the setup phase so that one 
 can
 be sure that they are not used instead of the Fedora packages.  

Done.  I have removed the entire directory containing the healpix and cfitsio
libraries in the setup phase.

The new files are again at:
Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec
SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library

2009-06-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430


Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lkund...@v3.sk




--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk  2009-06-06 19:24:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
 Here is rpmlint:
 rpmlint healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm
 healpy.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib
 
 I don't know what to do about this error since the package requires
 python-matplotlib for plotting, a major purpose of the program.  

That's completely fine. rpmlint is most likely confused by lib substring,
wrongly concluding that it is a package that contains an ELF shared library
that  should be depended on automatically. It's perfectly OK to depend on a
python library explicitely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review