[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:57:46 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.1-1.fc11|0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:04:01 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-22 17:54:46 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxrandr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-22 17:41:07 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxrandr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-19 21:15:19 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-19 21:15:01 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-19 16:48:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-19 08:06:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxrandr Short Description: Simple monitor config tool Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482
Simon Wesp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-19
07:53:49 EDT ---
=== REVIEW lxrandr ===
template:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
O.K.
* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
O.K.
- No duplicated libs
- Cflags are honored
- BuildRoot tag is okay
-
* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
O.K.
* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
O.K.
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
O.K.
* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
package: ab2c7f6be7e4fe6d1a26e324d836453e lxrandr-0.1.1.tar.gz
my dl: ab2c7f6be7e4fe6d1a26e324d836453e lxrandr-0.1.1.tar.gz
* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
O.K.
* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
N/A
* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
O.K.
* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
O.K.
* MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A
* MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
N/A
* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
O.K.
* MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
O.K.
* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
O.K.
* MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
O.K.
* MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
O.K.
* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
O.K.
* MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
N/A
* MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
N/A
* MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
N/A
* MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
N/A
* MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
N/A
* MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
N/A
* MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{ve
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
