[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-10-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com  2009-09-24 03:05:57 EDT ---
approved

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #6 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us  2009-09-24 03:54:13 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: clc
Short Description: Very simplistic MUD client for command line usage
Owners: elanthis
Branches: F12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-24 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-09-24 12:27:17 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?(s...@middleditch. |
   |us) |




--- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us  2009-09-19 17:04:03 
EDT ---
1) I am now explicitly setting the CFLAGS in the spec file, which both adds the
Fedora optimization flags and also overrides the Makefile's defaults (so the
spec file has to include a couple flags specific to clc).

2) Annoyingly, the tarballs were identical in contents other than timestamps on
the files.  I made sure I have the tarball directly from upstream in SOURCES
now.

3) The package is using the macros/variables consistently.  I had
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT only and no references to %{buildroot}.  The link you provided
states that I should use one or the other (with no official preference towards
either) and that I should not mix usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in
a single spec file, which I already complied with.  I converted to the macro
style anyway since it looks nicer IMO, and I used the macro style for
%{optflags} as well.

New files:

Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec
SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-4.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||needinfo?(s...@middleditch.
   ||us)




--- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com  2009-09-18 09:12:23 EDT ---
1]
i didn't see there usage of fedora compiler flags.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags

2] 
md5sum of download from SOURCE is different from tar which is in src.rpm
b6043dececbaa61e8a3b26a2bda33d38  clc-0.01.tar.gz
ed6d17913a6f8e1d9db4a210f5edef34  SOURCES/clc-0.01.tar.gz

3] macros usage
use only one style of macros or variable. not both in one spec file. so you
eiter replace variables with corresponding macros or macros with variables.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros


otherwise it looks good
spec file is in english and have correct name
directories, files and ownership is correct
compiling/building ok
dependencies ok
clean section present

please fix 1],2],3].

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343





--- Comment #2 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us  2009-09-12 16:17:30 
EDT ---
Now that libtelnet is in F12, I tried a scratch build on Koji.  That made it
clear that I forgot some build requires on packages I had installed on my local
machine (Koji is damn handy that way).  Updated to 0.01-3 with the build
requires added.  Verified it works on Koji now.

Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec
SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-3.fc12.src.rpm

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674042

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||515832




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jan.kle...@hp.com
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jan.kle...@hp.com
   Flag||fedora-review+




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Bug 520343 depends on bug 515832, which changed state.

Bug 515832 Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-11 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343


Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review+  |fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs

2009-09-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343





--- Comment #1 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us  2009-09-06 05:57:23 
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec
SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-2.fc12.src.rpm

Fixed a typo I just caught in the source URL for the spec file.  Updated to
release -2 and added a changelog note.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review