[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-03 15:08:58 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-01 02:01:07 EDT --- haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-30 20:01:57 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-29 05:55:53 EDT --- package imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-29 05:55:18 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-29 06:17:22 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523886, which changed state. Bug 523886 Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-27 22:41:47 EDT --- Thanks for testing. Now that we have all the haskell-platform packages in dist-f12 I rebuilt HTTP and cgi for the new network package. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Sep 28 2009 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com - 2009.2.0.2-2 - add all the buildrequires (#523883) - create ghcpkgdir since metapackage - nothing in bindir Built for me in koji just now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883
Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+,
||needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c
||om)
--- Comment #5 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-09-27 23:42:29
EDT ---
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
$ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
haskell-platform.src: W: strange-permission haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2.tar.gz
0600
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
~ $ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \
ghc-haskell-platform-devel-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \
ghc-haskell-platform-doc-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \
ghc-haskell-platform-prof-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
haskell-platform.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haskell-platform-devel
haskell-platform.x86_64: E: no-binary
ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-haskell-platform-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package
contains development documentation files for the haskell-platform library.
ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency
ghc-haskell-platform-devel
ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings.
I think that the package summary and description need fixing, since they're
currently boilerplate and haskell-platform is different than other Haskell
packages.
Other errors and warnings are generally fine.
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
Yes.
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Yes.
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
Yes.
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Yes.
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
Yes.
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Yes.
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
Yes.
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
N/A.
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
N/A.
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A.
# MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
Yes.
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
N/A.
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
Yes.
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
Yes.
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
Yes.
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 00:56:24 EDT --- Thanks Bryan and congratulations - looks like we have reached the goal! I'll fix the rpmlint before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-28 01:12:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: haskell-platform Short Description: Standard Haskell distribution Owners: petersen, bos Branches: devel F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-09-26 12:43:22 EDT --- We have until the 29th to get this in for the F-12 beta freeze. Let's go! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523104, which changed state. Bug 523104 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@serpentine.com Flag||needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-09-24 18:32:58 EDT --- The BuildRequires for this package are incorrect. It should fail before the %build stage due to unmet dependencies, but instead I get a build-time failure: Configuring haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: HTTP ==4000.0.6, cgi ==3001.1.7.1, editline ==0.2.1.0, fgl ==5.4.2.2, network ==2.2.1.4, zlib ==0.5.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523884, which changed state. Bug 523884 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||523104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||523884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://hackage.haskell.org/ ||platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-16 23:18:52 EDT --- With this users can just yum install haskell-platform and have a fully functional haskell devel env. Not sure if this will qualify fedora as the first distro to fully support haskell-platform officially? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||523886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
