[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #4 from Jiri Pirko jpi...@redhat.com 2009-10-16 04:43:29 EDT --- ok - here's the bz you can use (16MB attachment) - bz515677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-16 15:31:51 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-16 15:32:53 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Perl RPM Requires/Provides
As I understand it, the current version of rpmbuild works generates the Requires and Provides definitions for an RPM by parsing the Perl code and working out which modules are used (for Requires) or defined (for Provides). I don't want to get into a discussion of the rights or wrongs of this approach, but for my own RPMs, I'd like to experiment with creating the Requires and Provides definitions by parsing the META.yml file. I've found three files in /usr/lib/rpm - perldeps.pl, perl.prov and perl.req - which seem to do the work, so I assume these are the files I'll need to replace. Can someone please confirm that these are the files that I need to work on and (even better) point me at some documentation for how these programs are called - what inputs and outputs are expected, stuff like that. Also, is there a way to provide my own replacement for these files without just overwriting them. I'd rather not fiddle directly with system supplied code. Any advice appreciated. Cheers, Dave... -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: Perl RPM Requires/Provides
* Dave Cross [16/10/2009 22:04] : As I understand it, the current version of rpmbuild works generates the Requires and Provides definitions for an RPM by parsing the Perl code and working out which modules are used (for Requires) or defined (for Provides). Correct. Actually, it's not the current version, it's been that way for quite some time. Also, is there a way to provide my own replacement for these files without just overwriting them. I'd rather not fiddle directly with system supplied code. You can actually disable this behaviour by adding one of the following lines: AutoReqProv: no AutoReq: no AutoProv:no in your spec files. You can then use the Requires and Provides tags to provide the ones of your choice. Note that there's only the option of selectively removing the automatically found values: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides Emmanuel -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: Perl RPM Requires/Provides
ES == Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr writes: ES Note that there's only the option of selectively removing the ES automatically found values: ES http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides Well, actually if you look at what's on that page, it should be pretty obvious how to simply not call the old __perl_provides or __perl_requires scripts and not get any automatic Perl dependencies. - J -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
