[Bug 521363] Request upgrade of perl-Mail-IMAPClient
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521363 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:38:12 EDT --- perl-Mail-IMAPClient-3.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #11 from Ville Skyttä 2009-09-07 16:13:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > is this all handwaving and FUD? Thank you for so kindly considering differing opinions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #12 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-07 16:47:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > is this all handwaving and FUD? > > Thank you for so kindly considering differing opinions. As I said, I'm more than open to different opinions and the merits of these approaches. You claimed I'd done "actual harm" to Fedora, effectively saying that your opinions are fact and empirically quantifiable. I welcome and seek feedback, as this isn't dicta but rather an evolving process; but simply slamming the practice, citing "actual harm", and then claiming that "..a guideline will be needed" isn't very constructive. How about, instead of bashing, we sit down and try to work out how to best do this -- that is, including the test suite in some form that satisfies both of us and benefits the community as a whole. I'd like to see the evidence of any concrete harm done specific to including the test suites in %_docdir, but I haven't seen any yet, despite repeated requests. If there is actually any harm caused here, I'd like to correct it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #13 from Ville Skyttä 2009-09-08 02:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > You claimed I'd done "actual harm" to Fedora No I didn't, please read comment 4 again (I guess that's what you're referring to). But let's not get caught up with this or other word games. > How about, instead of bashing, we sit down and try to work out how to best do > this I have plenty on my plate so no thanks for now. But on a brief look, FullyTestablePerl looks like a good idea that would pretty much eliminate my concerns. And Stepan's suggestion at end of comment 9 (+ some real thought from the packagers whether to ship the tests) would be an improvement in the meantime. > I'd like to see the evidence of any concrete harm done specific to including > the test suites in %_docdir, but I haven't seen any yet The reasons given in comment 8 demonstrate why I think this stuff is harmful. IMO it makes affected packages worse than they would be without those issues, which I think qualifies this practice as harmful. You don't agree with it, but the "evidence" is there, and one (very insignificant) manifestation of it is this very bug. Dismissing it as handwaving, FUD or nonexistent is a bit extreme. I think it's about time we let this bug rest in peace and continue the discussion in another more appropriate medium in case someone still has something to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #14 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-08 03:34:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > You claimed I'd done "actual harm" to Fedora > > No I didn't, please read comment 4 again (I guess that's what you're referring > to). But let's not get caught up with this or other word games. I don't think anyone is playing word games here. I take it you're retracting your claim? > > How about, instead of bashing, we sit down and try to work out how to best > > do > > this > > I have plenty on my plate so no thanks for now. But on a brief look, > FullyTestablePerl looks like a good idea that would pretty much eliminate my > concerns. And Stepan's suggestion at end of comment 9 (+ some real thought > from the packagers whether to ship the tests) would be an improvement in the > meantime. Good. With perl now shipping /etc/rpm/macros.perl we have a good vehicle for delivery of any helper macros. > > I'd like to see the evidence of any concrete harm done specific to including > > the test suites in %_docdir, but I haven't seen any yet > > The reasons given in comment 8 demonstrate why I think this stuff is harmful. > IMO it makes affected packages worse than they would be without those issues, > which I think qualifies this practice as harmful. You don't agree with it, > but > the "evidence" is there, and one (very insignificant) manifestation of it is > this very bug. Dismissing it as handwaving, FUD or nonexistent is a bit > extreme. If there's other "evidence", that is, something "actively harmful", I'd appreciate it if you could point it out, so I could at least own up to it and fix it. > I think it's about time we let this bug rest in peace and continue the > discussion in another more appropriate medium in case someone still has > something to say. Fine by me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 521756] New: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521756 Summary: perl-Config-General-2.44 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: ASSIGNED Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Config-General AssignedTo: ville.sky...@iki.fi ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, ville.sky...@iki.fi Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.44 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 2.43 URL: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Config/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #15 from Ville Skyttä 2009-09-08 12:56:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I take it you're retracting your claim? I don't know what you're referring to. This is nothing personal, and I haven't claimed you having done actual harm to Fedora; I simply don't know if you consistently follow this practice I find harmful and I'm not after anyone. Comment 4 *is* what I think and I'm not retracting that (note "when done as a general packaging practice", and see also the 2nd paragraph of comment 8). But I'm done with this discussion here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 521756] perl-Config-General-2.44 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521756 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.44-1 Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] New: perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 Summary: perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Mail-Box AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: p...@bieringer.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: After installing perl-Mail-Box and its dependencies, a program still not run. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Mail-Box-2.073-1.el5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install perl-Mail-Box 2. start program Actual results: Can't locate Object/Realize/Later.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Message/Body/Delayed.pm line 17. Expected results: Not such result Additional info: Have to install also perl-Object-Realize-Later, wonder a little bit because all other dependencies are catched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 18:44:03 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 18:44:08 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 18:48:12 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:56:41 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Mail-Box'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 498746] Non-responsive package maintainer + dead package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746 Erick Calder changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@arix.com --- Comment #3 from Erick Calder 2009-09-11 02:11:24 EDT --- I am the package maintainer. I've just joined the Fedora maintainer's system and have yet to figure out how to bring the package out of retirement. help appreciated, please e-mail me (e...@arix.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 498746] Non-responsive package maintainer + dead package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-11 03:06:29 EDT --- I suppose you need to find old review of this package and ask for branches with comment that package is live again. In case old review doesn't exist, you'll create new one according to guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and you asked for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 498746] Non-responsive package maintainer + dead package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-11 04:46:41 EDT --- > I am the package maintainer. The term "package maintainer" refers to the Fedora RPM package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 498746] Non-responsive package maintainer + dead package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746 --- Comment #6 from Erick Calder 2009-09-11 17:54:44 EDT --- oh, well then I should state: "I wish to be the package maintainer". actually, cpan2rpm is distributed in RPM form, so all I need to do is figure out how to contribute it to Fedora for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:34:23 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:34:48 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.091-1.fc10|2.091-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.091-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||2.15-5.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 504389] RFE: update to 0.11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:40:43 EDT --- perl-Sys-SigAction-0.11-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520505] Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:40:30 EDT --- perl-JSON-2.15-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 504389] RFE: update to 0.11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.11-2.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 498746] Non-responsive package maintainer + dead package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498746 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-12 03:53:02 EDT --- That should be easy. All it would take is a little commitment to actually maintaining the RPM package in the Fedora package collection in adherance with Fedora Packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join In the case of cpan2rpm I also recommend you present an updated/fixed src.rpm with a Package Review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 513580] Please build latest perl-DateTime-Format-Excel for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:54:25 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 513580] Please build latest perl-DateTime-Format-Excel for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:54:54 EDT --- perl-DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 513580] Please build latest perl-DateTime-Format-Excel for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.2901-3.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 513580] Please build latest perl-DateTime-Format-Excel for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513580 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.2901-3.el5|0.2901-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 519648] virStorageVolLookupBy* not implemented
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519648 Daniel Berrange changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #1 from Daniel Berrange 2009-09-14 07:13:59 EDT --- Patch available upstream http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt-perl.git;a=commit;h=c79d567cc3a2e0e09358001c539fa7b6ee96837e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502403] RFE: add %{?perl_default_filter} to the perl spec template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502403 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 17:45:21 EDT --- rpmdevtools-7.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmdevtools-7.5-1.fc11?_csrf_token=018644e6f79eac4e110aeac47d19804d64593771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502402] RFE: please deliver (and use!) filtering macros
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502402 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 16:22:07 EDT --- perl-5.10.0-82.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.10.0-82.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502403] RFE: add %{?perl_default_filter} to the perl spec template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:16:17 EDT --- rpmdevtools-7.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpmdevtools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 505576] perl-PAR-Packer not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505576 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä 2009-09-20 14:01:08 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 505576] perl-PAR-Packer not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505576 Stepan Kasal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ska...@redhat.com Resolution||RAWHIDE AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ska...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Stepan Kasal 2009-09-22 04:18:35 EDT --- fixed in perl-PAR-Packer-0.991-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 524894] New: perl-PAR-Packer debuginfo is empty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PAR-Packer debuginfo is empty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524894 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer debuginfo is empty Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-PAR-Packer AssignedTo: mmasl...@redhat.com ReportedBy: ville.sky...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Blocks: 496968 Classification: Fedora From http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-PAR-Packer/0.991/3.fc12/data/logs/x86_64/build.log : gcc static.o -s -Wl,-E [...] Looks like the build strips binaries before rpmbuild has had a chance to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 511568] FTBFS perl-Log-Log4perl-1.20-3.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511568 Stepan Kasal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Stepan Kasal 2009-09-23 11:42:08 EDT --- fixed in 1.24-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 511645] FTBFS perl-SQL-Statement-1.15-5.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511645 Stepan Kasal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Stepan Kasal 2009-09-23 13:53:58 EDT --- fixed by perl-SQL-Statement-1.20-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 524894] perl-PAR-Packer debuginfo is empty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524894
Stepan Kasal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2009-09-23 14:17:24 EDT
---
The build process uses a built binary program (myldr/static) to create the parl
and parldyn binaries before installing.
I cannot find any way to fix this; let it be until a perl-PAR expert appears.
(I set debug_package to %{nil) to prevent creating an empty debuginfo package.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 509419] perl-Glib Requires a development package: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509419 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-23 17:45:59 EDT --- There is an error with this built, because perl-Glib-devel requires the same nevr as perl-Glib. The problem arise when one want to install perl-Glib-devel from the current updates-testing having perl-Glib already installed from F-11 GA. Once done, I wonder if there is a chance to list packages that will need to be modified. repoquery --whatrequires "perl(Glib::MakeHelper)" doesn't seems to output anything. The problem is that bug doesn't have a chance to be closed anytime soon if none check which package would requires the new -devel one: He is a list of the candidate: (which are now potentially failing to enable the Glib loop) # repoquery --whatrequires "perl(Glib)" perl-Gtk2-0:1.203-1.fc11.x86_64 perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0:0.08-6.fc11.1.x86_64 perl-Gnome2-GConf-0:1.044-5.fc11.x86_64 Sprog-0:0.14-16.fc11.noarch perl-Event-RPC-0:1.01-2.fc11.noarch xfconf-perl-0:4.6.1-1.fc11.x86_64 gmusicbrowser-0:1.0.1-2.fc11.noarch perl-Goo-Canvas-0:0.06-2.fc11.x86_64 perl-QWizard-0:3.15-2.fc11.noarch perl-Gnome2-VFS-0:1.081-2.fc11.x86_64 perl-Gtk2-Ex-CalendarButton-0:0.01-6.fc11.noarch shutter-0:0.80.1-2.fc11.noarch perl-Gtk2-ImageView-0:0.04-3.fc11.x86_64 clamtk-0:4.10-1.fc11.noarch gscan2pdf-0:0.9.27-4.fc11.noarch asciio-0:1.02.71-3.fc11.noarch dayplanner-0:0.10-1.fc11.noarch xmms2-perl-0:0.5-6.fc11.x86_64 perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0:0.08-6.fc11.5.x86_64 perl-GStreamer-0:0.15-1.fc11.x86_64 perl-AnyEvent-0:4.350-1.fc11.noarch perl-App-Asciio-0:1.02.71-3.fc11.noarch perl-Net-DBus-GLib-0:0.33.0-2.fc11.x86_64 perl-Gtk2-Ex-Dialogs-0:0.11-4.fc11.noarch perl-Glib-0:1.201-2.fc11.x86_64 pcsc-tools-0:1.4.14-2.fc11.x86_64 perl-Gnome2-Canvas-0:1.002-10.fc11.x86_64 perl-Data-TreeDumper-Renderer-GTK-0:0.02-5.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] New: Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 Summary: Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-HTML-Tree AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: jfe...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Blocks: 524832 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=362580) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362580) test script exhibiting bug Description of problem: HTML::Element::as_XML() has a bug where tags added to empty_element_map but which contain data are missing their close tag when generating XML. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.23-4 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run attached script Actual results: Not mapped to empty element (correct) http://example.com/";> Mapped to empty element, no extra content (correct) http://example.com/"; /> Mapped to empty element, extra content (missing close tag) http://example.com/";>Extra content Expected results: Not mapped to empty element (correct) http://example.com/";> Mapped to empty element, no extra content (correct) http://example.com/"; /> Mapped to empty element, extra content (correct) http://example.com/";>Extra content Additional info: I opened an upstream bug with a patch https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=49932 however it may take a while for a new version to come out. Since HTML::Element is the base class for XML::Element this bug affects all XML systems where tags can be optionally empty and people wish to use the short circuit form for the empty tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fearn 2009-09-24 18:54:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362581) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362581) fix that bug! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 Jeff Fearn changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 49932 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490781] Segfault in XML::LibXSLT due to reference counting bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490781 --- Comment #3 from Jim Radford 2009-09-25 15:04:45 EDT --- FYI, this patch has been applied upstream. https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=40844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 521363] Request upgrade of perl-Mail-IMAPClient
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521363 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 21:29:08 EDT --- perl-Mail-IMAPClient-3.20-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 521363] Request upgrade of perl-Mail-IMAPClient
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521363 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 21:29:41 EDT --- perl-Mail-IMAPClient-3.20-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 511445] FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007-1.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511445 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 511752] FTBFS perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers-0.19-1.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511752 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 511652] FTBFS perl-MooseX-Role-Parameterized-0.09-2.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511652 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 520431] package unusable, missing dependency "POE::Component::Pluggable"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520431 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Bug 520431 depends on bug 520460, which changed state. Bug 520460 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-27 00:46:47 EDT --- We have perl-POE-Component-Pluggable in rawhide now, so we should be OK here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-28 10:45:54 EDT --- Updates are building for this now, thanks for the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 12:04:58 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 12:05:44 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 12:05:49 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 12:04:53 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 14:23:11 EDT --- perl-Mail-Box-2.091-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 522136] perl-Mail-Box RPM misses dependency to perl-Object-Realize-Later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522136 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.091-1.fc11|2.091-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 526255] New: tkmib crashes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: tkmib crashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526255 Summary: tkmib crashes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de ReportedBy: jsafr...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: /usr/bin/tkmib from net-snmp-gui-5.4.2.1-17.fc12.x86_64 crashes on rawhide, while the same /usr/bin/tkmib runs well on Fedora 11. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Tk-804.028-10.fc12.x86_64 perl-5.10.0-82.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install net-snmp-gui 2. tkmib Actual results: setting opts Segmentation fault (core dumped) Expected results: tkmib shows some fancy GUI Stack trace: Core was generated by `/usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/tkmib'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 Tk_AllocFontFromObj (interp=, tkwin=0x275d7c0, objPtr=0x278a470) at tkFont.c:1145 1145 fontPtr->resourceRefCount = 1; (gdb) bt #0 Tk_AllocFontFromObj (interp=, tkwin=0x275d7c0, objPtr=0x278a470) at tkFont.c:1145 #1 0x7f176f349dc2 in DoObjConfig (interp=0x26c8190, recordPtr=, optionPtr=0x276d880, valuePtr=0x278a470, tkwin=, savedOptionPtr=0x0) at tkConfig.c:799 #2 0x7f176f34a002 in Tk_InitOptions (interp=0x26c8190, recordPtr=, optionTable=, tkwin=0x275d7c0) at tkConfig.c:569 #3 0x7f176d1b8838 in Tk_MenubuttonObjCmd (clientData=, interp=0x26c8190, objc=, objv=0x2043aa0) at tkMenubutton.c:306 #4 0x7f176f2cf595 in Call_Tk (info=, items=4, args=0x2043aa0) at tkGlue.c:2283 #5 0x7f176f2d1190 in XSTkCommand (cv=0x278a038, mwcd=, proc=0x7f176d1b8550 , items=4, args=0x2043aa0) at tkGlue.c:3062 #6 0x7f176d1b7064 in XS_Tk_menubutton (my_perl=0x1e2c010, cv=0x278a038) at Menubutton.xs:29 #7 0x7f177751411a in Perl_pp_entersub (my_perl=0x1e2c010) at pp_hot.c:2850 #8 0x7f17774ea4a8 in Perl_runops_debug (my_perl=0x1e2c010) at dump.c:1931 #9 0x7f1777510049 in S_run_body (oldscope=, my_perl=) at perl.c:2386 #10 perl_run (oldscope=, my_perl=) at perl.c:2309 #11 0x00400cfc in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff1e77b7a8, env=0x7fff1e77b7c0) at perlmain.c:113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:27:56 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.23-9.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:37:37 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.23-9.fc11 |3.23-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 526872] New: Update to rt 3.6.9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Update to rt 3.6.9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526872 Summary: Update to rt 3.6.9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: rt3 AssignedTo: xav...@bachelot.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: xav...@bachelot.org, rc040...@freenet.de, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mma...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: All versions of RT from 3.4.6 to 3.8.4 are vulnerable to an escaping bug in the display of Custom Fields that could allow injection of javascript into the RT UI. http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2009-September/000172.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 526872] Update to rt 3.6.9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526872 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 03:27:10 EDT --- rt3-3.6.9-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rt3-3.6.9-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502403] RFE: add %{?perl_default_filter} to the perl spec template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502403 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 05:57:37 EDT --- rpmdevtools-7.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502403] RFE: add %{?perl_default_filter} to the perl spec template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||7.5-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 502402] RFE: please deliver (and use!) filtering macros
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502402 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-06 06:07:02 EDT --- perl-5.10.0-82.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] New: Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tainted variables in sprintf format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000 Summary: Tainted variables in sprintf format Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Image-ExifTool AssignedTo: tcall...@redhat.com ReportedBy: p...@datasphere.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Some tainted variable(s) are used in sprintf statement(s) causing warnings when calling program is executed with the -T option. In example: Insecure dependency in sprintf while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Image/ExifTool/Exif.pm line 2958 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.10.0-73.fc10.i386 perl-Image-Exiftool-7.67-1.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always in 5.10.0, providing the sprintf statement is reached. Steps to Reproduce: I don't know how to force it: I discovered it while testing a spamassassin OCR plugin. Actual results: See above Expected results: No warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-08 11:54:30 EDT --- Hrm. This will be tough to fix/report upstream without a way to reproduce it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-10-08 12:04:05 EDT --- There was problem with spamassasin which was workaround with rebuild of perl. But I made the change only in F-12 build. Could be the same issue? #510127 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-10-08 13:38:42
EDT ---
Here are some details. The lines causing the trouble are:
$format and $exifTool->Warn(
sprintf("Unknown format ($format) for $dirName tag 0x%x",$tagID));
So $format and/or $dirName are tainted. I'm not a Perl guy, so I can hardly
backtrack these variable's sources (it even comes from out of the module), but
I think the faulty statement can be rewritten as:
$format and $exifTool->Warn(
sprintf("Unknown format (%d) for %s tag 0x%x",$format,$dirName,$tagID));
in a more secure way that does not cause the taint problem, but at the expense
of poorer readability, I agree.
>From what I can see by examining Exif.pm, some other sprintf statements might
be subject to similar problems (i.e.: lines 2918, 2941, 2972, ...).
I apologize for not being able to reproduce, but the line is reached when there
is an unknown format in an Exif directory of a picture that I do not have
anymore (rejected by SpamAssassin!)
Whether the current bug is related to bug 510127 or not is out of my Perl
understanding... and since I do not know how to reproduce, I cannot even test
it on rawhide :-( Sorry and thanks for the proposal.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 526872] Update to rt 3.6.9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526872 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-08 14:05:08 EDT --- rt3-3.6.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rt3'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 509419] perl-Glib Requires a development package: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509419 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.201-3.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 509419] perl-Glib Requires a development package: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509419 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-08 23:31:33 EDT --- perl-Glib-1.201-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Mašláňová 2009-10-09 08:19:21 EDT --- You can try latest rebuild of perl for F-10. It will be in testing updates in few days or download from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528159] New: warning in Fedora::Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: warning in Fedora::Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528159 Summary: warning in Fedora::Bugzilla Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, jpi...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Could you please look at this problems? WARNING: String found where Type expected (did you use a => instead of a , ?) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/Bugzilla/Types.pm line 39 WARNING: String found where Type expected (did you use a => instead of a , ?) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/Bugzilla/Types.pm line 44 Also in spec is missing Requires: perl(RPC-XML) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 528000] Tainted variables in sprintf format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528000
Phil Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boardhea...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Phil Harvey 2009-10-09 13:09:44
EDT ---
If this generates taint errors, I'm surprised that exiftool doesn't
generate more. The value of $format is obtained from an unpack('S',...)
call, so the result is guaranteed to be either undefined or a number
in the range 0 to 65535. How is this a security problem when used
in a sprintf format string?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529172] New: Fedora::Bugzilla - get_flag() doesn't work for all flags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - get_flag() doesn't work for all flags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529172 Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - get_flag() doesn't work for all flags Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: jpi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=364891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364891) test script Description of problem: I have trouble with get_flag() method of Fedora::Bugzilla::Bug. It works for me for all flags except of "rhel-5.5.0" (and probably others). When I walk thru the flags manually, the flag is there. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10-1 - I tried 0.13 from CPAN and problem is still there. How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: run attached script Actual results: has pm_ack + has rhel-5.5.0 can't get rhel-5.5.0 flag devel_ack, + qa_ack, + pm_ack, + rhel-5.5.0, + Expected results: has pm_ack + has rhel-5.5.0 + devel_ack, + qa_ack, + pm_ack, + rhel-5.5.0, + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] New: Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: jpi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=364932) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=364932) test script Description of problem: When I use Fedora::Bugzilla->get_bug() to get a big BZ (e.g. with 4MB attachment), it gets stuck after a while and top shows ~99% cpu usage for this script. I use bz504799 to trigger this. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10-1 - I tried 0.13 from CPAN and problem is still there. How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: run attached script Actual results: Script will never finish and consumes ~98% of cpu. Expected results: Script finishes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-15 21:23:46 EDT --- Thanks for the reports! I'm working on a number of enhancements/fixes, and will address these shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-16 00:18:05 EDT --- Interesting -- Im "not authorized to access bug#504799". Do you have another bug where you're seeing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Pirko 2009-10-16 04:29:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Interesting -- Im "not authorized to access bug#504799". Do you have another > bug where you're seeing this? Ups, this is private bz. I'll try to find another... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #4 from Jiri Pirko 2009-10-16 04:43:29 EDT --- ok - here's the bz you can use (16MB attachment) - bz515677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-16 15:31:51 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 525587] Close tag missing in XML output of optionally empty tags
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525587 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-16 15:32:53 EDT --- perl-HTML-Tree-3.23-9.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 50612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 35672 CC||ska...@redhat.com Component|perl-Fedora-Bugzilla|perl-XML-Twig AssignedTo|cw...@alumni.drew.edu |ska...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-18 03:55:21 EDT --- Hmmm Looks like this is actually an XML::Twig issue, reportes as rt35672; there's a 3.33 "development" kicking around on xmltwig.com that resolves this. http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=35672 http://xmltwig.com/xmltwig/XML-Twig-3.33.tar.gz I've filed another tix asking that it be "officially" released to the CPAN; if that happens we can easily update perl-XML-Twig... If it doesn't, we should still look at updating perl-XML-Twig, as there are 2+ years of fixes/enhancements in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Pirko 2009-10-18 12:34:37 EDT --- Right, I installed XML-Twig-3.33.tar.gz and the issue does not occur. Thanks Chris. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová 2009-10-19 11:29:35 EDT --- I believe these bug fixes are valuable and we should update XML::Twig. In Changes are mainly bugfixes so I hope it will be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530045] New: Dep versions in spec file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Dep versions in spec file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530045 Summary: Dep versions in spec file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Module-Install AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: e...@membled.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora The spec file doesn't give versions for some requirements, this tightens it up: --- perl-Module-Install.spec~ 2009-07-27 16:39:39.0 +0100 +++ perl-Module-Install.spec2009-10-21 11:19:31.0 +0100 @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Archive::Tar) BuildRequires: perl(CPAN) -BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PPPort) -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Install) +BuildRequires: perl(Devel::PPPort) >= 3.16 +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Install) >= 1.52 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) -BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS) +BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::ParseXS) >= 2.19 BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) >= 1.42 BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) BuildRequires: perl(JSON) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530045] Dep versions in spec file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530045 --- Comment #1 from Ed Avis 2009-10-21 06:27:24 EDT --- Note that according to its Makefile.PL, Module::Install requires Devel::PPPort version 3.16. But perl 5.10, currently the version in rawhide, only provides 3.13. I don't know what you will decide to do about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530137] New: Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: jpi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=365567) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365567) test script Description of problem: When I try to get bugs that bz depends on, it fails in a way below and returns only one bz "0". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10-1 - I tried 0.13 from CPAN and problem is still there. How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: run attached script Actual results: blocks_bug Use of uninitialized value $_[1] in exists at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/MooseX/AttributeHelpers/MethodProvider/ImmutableHash.pm line 10. 0 all_blocked_bugs Expected results: blocks_bug 499884 all_blocked_bugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530137] Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 --- Comment #1 from Jiri Pirko 2009-10-21 13:02:43 EDT --- Well all_blocked_bugs() returns bzs listed in "Blocks" field. This suggest following: "Depends on" *eq* blocks_bug() "Blocks" *eq* all_blocked_bugs() That doesn't sound good to me. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-21 23:51:41 EDT --- Ok, so no response from the author. I'm going to deploy 3.33 into production on a couple systems at work tomorrow and see what happens... Assuming everything goes OK (as I believe it will) I'll update our package here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530137] Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-22 01:44:42 EDT --- Yeah... Not good :) I've updated the blocks/depends atts and added tests to validate it. I haven't pushed it to the CPAN as 0.14 yet as I have some additional work to square away with the alias bits, but it is out on github... As well as documentation to write :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530137] Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Pirko 2009-10-22 02:56:35 EDT --- Hmm, Can you please provide me your testing pre-0.14 package for testing? Or do you plan to update cpan to 0.14 any time soon? My script is kinda stuck atm :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #9 from Marcela Mašláňová 2009-10-22 03:38:47 EDT --- Um, I've already update to 0.33 in F-12 and rawhide. I believe with comparison to other Fedora updates, this is only small risk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 529220] Fedora::Bugzilla - script gets stuck when getting a big BZ
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529220 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-22 10:44:03 EDT --- No problem. :) The author did just respond and state that he is going to cut a new GA release "ASAP", so hopefully we can switch over when that comes out. (I have a feeling it's also going to be called 3.33) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 530137] Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-10-22 10:55:10 EDT --- No problem: http://github.com/RsrchBoy/fedora-bugzilla I do plan on releasing 0.14 soon... I'm hoping later this week I should have a few tuits free to do just that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
