[Bug 479124] Please update to amavisd-new-2.6.2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479124 Johan Kok johan-fed...@deds.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||johan-fed...@deds.nl Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Johan Kok johan-fed...@deds.nl 2009-03-21 08:25:08 EDT --- Thanks for the report. Bug #456144 is already about updating amavisd-new to the most recent upstream version. To keep track of progress in one place, I'm closing this issue as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 456144 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-20 14:32:52 EDT --- perl-Tk-804.028-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Tk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ska...@redhat.com AssignedTo|andreas.bierf...@lowlatency |ska...@redhat.com |.de | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-19 12:00:08 EDT --- perl-Tk-804.028-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tk-804.028-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |10 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added CC|den...@ausil.us | --- Comment #20 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-l...@redhat.com 2008-11-25 20:57:50 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #21 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-03-19 15:48:45 EDT --- Working against bug zapper once more...Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490743] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490743 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-03-18 03:17:39 EDT --- AFAIS, the OP is right. I am going to add R: perl(Object::Accessor) R: perl(Devel::Cover) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490743] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490743 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 03:48:31 EDT --- perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490781] Segfault in XML::LibXSLT due to reference counting bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490781 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 2009-03-18 09:49:52 EDT --- Fixed in perl-XML-LibXSLT-3, both in rawhide and (eventually) in F-10 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490743] perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490743 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-18 15:07:52 EDT --- perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490743] New: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490743 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl(Object::Accessor) and perl(Devel::Cover) Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: high Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage AssignedTo: ska...@redhat.com ReportedBy: jpazdzi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ska...@redhat.com, robin.norw...@gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage shoud Require perl-Object-Accessor and perl-Devel-Cover. Without it, using ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage fails: $ perl -e 'use ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage' Base class package Object::Accessor is empty. (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first, or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib64/perl5/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .). at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ExtUtils/MakeMaker/Coverage.pm line 5 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ExtUtils/MakeMaker/Coverage.pm line 5. Compilation failed in require at -e line 1. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1. and make testcover fails with $ make testcover cover -delete make: cover: Command not found make: *** [coverclean] Error 127 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -q perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage-0.05-4.fc9.noarch How reproducible: Tried once. Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -q --requires perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage Actual results: $ rpm -q --requires perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 Expected results: $ rpm -q --requires perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-Coverage /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::Coverage) perl(File::Basename) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 perl(Object::Accessor) perl(Devel::Cover) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 Patrick pd...@york.ac.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pd...@york.ac.uk --- Comment #2 from Patrick pd...@york.ac.uk 2009-03-17 15:26:58 EDT --- I have exactly the same problem, It can be solved the same way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 490781] New: Segfault in XML::LibXSLT due to reference counting bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Segfault in XML::LibXSLT due to reference counting bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490781 Summary: Segfault in XML::LibXSLT due to reference counting bug Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT AssignedTo: ska...@redhat.com ReportedBy: radf...@blackbean.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ska...@redhat.com, z...@fastmail.fm, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Depends on: 488182 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=335621) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335621) patch to fix reference counting bug in XML::LibXSLT 1.68 XML::LibXSLT has a reference counting bug that leads to segfaults. There is an upstream bug report with no action, so I'm attaching a patch which fixes the bug. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40844 The patch is for 1.68 since it's in f10 testing, but the bug is also present in 1.66. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-13 14:42:23 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.08-3.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489825] Errors in perl-Newt: exported flag issue and documentation fixes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489825 --- Comment #1 from Joe Ogulin kiltedkni...@verizon.net 2009-03-11 21:36:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=334883) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334883) Patch to correct documentation error and misspelling -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489825] New: Errors in perl-Newt: exported flag issue and documentation fixes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Errors in perl-Newt: exported flag issue and documentation fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489825 Summary: Errors in perl-Newt: exported flag issue and documentation fixes Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Newt AssignedTo: jor...@redhat.com ReportedBy: kiltedkni...@verizon.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jor...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=334882) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334882) Patch to remove additional reference of NEWT_FLAG_NOSCROLL Description of problem: In a perl script use Newt qw(:flags); produces: NEWT_FLAG_NOSCROLL is not exported by the Newt module Also, if you look at man Newt you will see a misspelling in the middle: Drawing panels instead uf running them And this at the end: POD ERRORS Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained below: Around line 860: You forgot a ’=back’ before ’=head1’ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.08-21 How reproducible: Install perl-Newt, use :flags as part of the list of things. Actual results: See above Expected results: No errors; no misspellings Additional info: Attached are two patch files to correct the problems along with a modified spec file. Since the newt-perl-1.08-debian.patch removed the one NEWT_FLAG_NOSCROLL, I am assuming that it should be removed. Otherwise, the export patch should be removed and the debian patch modified to leave NEWT_FLAG_NOSCROLL in place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489825] Errors in perl-Newt: exported flag issue and documentation fixes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489825 Joe Ogulin kiltedkni...@verizon.net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #334884|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489421] swig-doc shouldn't provide perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489421 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-03-10 13:55:26 EDT --- Adding perl-sig to cc list so that everyone (or at least, their mail filter) is aware that perl module builds in rawhide are most likely going to fail until this is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489421] swig-doc shouldn't provide perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489421 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com 2009-03-10 14:43:42 EDT --- Fixed in the latest build (swig-1.3.38-5.fc11), I think it will be moved to F11 Beta soon (https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1324). Thanks for the report, sorry for troubles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489421] swig-doc shouldn't provide perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489421 Adam Tkac at...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489421] swig-doc shouldn't provide perl(Test::More)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489421 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-03-10 14:42:52 EDT --- One part of a potential work-around to this issue: sing ships privates copies (outdated versions) of perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::More) Getting rid of these by adding this near to the end of %prep /bin/rm -rf Examples/test-suite/perl5/Test* will likely help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 Jason Burrell jaybeeu...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaybeeu...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Burrell jaybeeu...@gmail.com 2009-03-10 23:35:11 EDT --- This appears to be a known bug in the upstream perl-Tk wrt XIM (I believe perl-Tk's r12589 is supposedly a fix for it). An easy temporary work around is to disable XIM by unset'ing or clearing XMODIFIERS: $ XMODIFIERS='' perl -MTk -we 'my $top = MainWindow-new-getOpenFile(-title = GetFile);' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 489228] New: Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489228 Summary: Keyboard does not work in perl-Tk programs Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: perl-Tk AssignedTo: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de ReportedBy: pierre.lac...@neuf.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierf...@lowlatency.de, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: It is impossible to use the keyboard (a french keyboard in my case) in perl-Tk programs). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl 5.10.0 perl-Tk 5.fc9 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run the following simple program with perl. use Tk; my $top = MainWindow-new; my $filename=$top-getOpenFile( -title = 'GetFile', ); Actual results: Try to type some text in the dialog box that opens. Nothing happens. Expected results: What I type should appear in the dialog box. Additional info: I could use my perl-Tk programs with no problems a few weeks ago. I have a french keyboard, and I run Gnome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-09 01:56:02 EDT --- perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-3.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-05 15:06:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621
--- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 12:24:25 EDT
---
Basically, Perl packages should own everything they provide (including
directories) under %{perl_vendorarch} or %{perl_vendorlib} except
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto Even if they're already owned by another Perl
package. (Rationale being that as we move to 5.10.1, 5.10.2, etc, we will see
directory ownership start to be a bit fuzzy.)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Directory_Ownership
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-03 12:56:30 EDT --- Thanks for pointing me to this Guidelines section I haven't noticed... It seems clear now :) http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities-0.02-3.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Mar 03 2009 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com - 0.08-3 - Fix from review : Gtk2 dir ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 James Ralston rals...@pobox.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from James Ralston rals...@pobox.com 2009-03-03 13:56:36 EDT --- Yes, I think we can close this. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 20:37:31 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-04 02:28:44 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed Short Description: Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget Owners: remi Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621
Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cw...@alumni.drew.edu
Alias||perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-03 00:32:10 EDT
---
rpmlint's warnings are expected for Perl packages; and while
MozEmbed.so()(64bit) will need to be filtered, we're still figuring out the
best way to do that over on fedora-perl-devel-list, so that's not a blocker
right now.
1) MozEmbed.xs and other source files say LGPLv2+.
2) %check should be included, even if make test needs to be wrapped in some
construct to prevent it from running in mock, e.g.:
%{?_with_display_tests: make test}
This will allow rebuilding locally using rpmbuild --with display-tests or
defining %_with_display_tests 1 in ~/.rpmmacros.
3) '%{__rm}' should be replaced with just 'rm', or make and chmod also need to
be their macro representations. (Though I always prefer the %{_fixperms} chmod
incantation :))
4) %{perl_vendorarch}/Gtk2 and %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Gtk2 need to be included
as dirs in %files. One easy way to do so is:
%{perl_vendorarch}/*
%exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/
koji @ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1215907
Source tarball matches upstream:
23ffb8e4134ee8a8897149bf9db43d400cdbbe17 Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08.tar.gz
23ffb8e4134ee8a8897149bf9db43d400cdbbe17 Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08.tar.gz.srpm
Provides, requires and rpmlint looks sane:
= perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm =
rpmlint
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl.h
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl-autogen.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
provides for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
MozEmbed.so()(64bit)
perl(Gtk2::MozEmbed) = 0.08
perl(Gtk2::MozEmbed::Install::Files)
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed = 0.08-1.fc10
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed(x86-64) = 0.08-1.fc10
requires for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
gecko-libs = 1.9.0.6
libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libnspr4.so()(64bit)
libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
libplc4.so()(64bit)
libplds4.so()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libxpcom.so()(64bit)
libxul.so()(64bit)
perl = 0:5.008
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(DynaLoader)
perl(Glib) = 1.180
perl(Gtk2)
perl(Gtk2) = 1.081
perl(strict)
perl(warnings)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
= perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm =
rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
provides for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo = 0.08-1.fc10
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.08-1.fc10
requires for perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo-0.08-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
Address #1-4 and I think we're in business :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-03-03 02:35:10 EDT --- 1, 2 and 3 fixed About 4, I don't think this folders need to be owned be the package. Both are already owned by perl-Gtk2 which is Required . Both are also owned by perl-Gtk2-TrayIcon which is probably a mistake (or an exception for the Guidelines exists for perl ?) Guidelines : Packages must not own files already owned by other packages. http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483237] Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483237 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 22:59:41 EDT --- Hm. Bodhi should have closed this ages ago... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481519] HTTP::Body 1.04 in F-9, F-10?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481519 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-01 23:01:13 EDT --- Hm, bodhi should have closed this ages ago... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 462478] Please update perl-YAML-Tiny to latest from rawhide (ACLs set)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462478 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(st...@silug.org) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 Bernard Johnson bjohn...@symetrix.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 486752] New: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486752 Summary: Fedora::Bugzilla needs to depend on MooseX::MultiInitArg Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-Fedora-Bugzilla AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-Fedora-Bugzilla silently misses a dep on MooseX::MultiInitArg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:27 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in interesting ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:35 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in interesting ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||485961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481165] Update rt3 to 3.6.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481165 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org 2009-02-16 12:21:41 EDT --- Pushed to EPEL stable, as well as a fixed perl-Devel-StackTrace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481165] Update rt3 to 3.6.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481165 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481165] Update rt3 to 3.6.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481165 Bug 481165 depends on bug 481163, which changed state. Bug 481163 Summary: Update perl-Devel-StackTrace to = 1.19 in EPEL5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481163 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 477426] [monafont] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |[monafont] Please convert |packaging guidelines|to new font packaging ||guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 --- Comment #25 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-02-12 03:05:04 EDT --- Erm, can we close this? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-12 03:34:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Debug Short Description: Perl debug output package Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-13 01:52:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file conflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-11 16:52:41 EDT --- Should be fixed by 1.5.9 RC2: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=82403 Leaving open until the file conflicts check is passed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-11 22:58:40 EDT --- looks good to me now, APPROVED. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484866] New: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484866 Summary: perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Network-IPv4Addr AssignedTo: den...@ausil.us ReportedBy: bugs.mich...@gmx.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, den...@ausil.us Classification: Fedora perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484867] New: perl-bioperl : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-bioperl : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484867 Summary: perl-bioperl : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-bioperl AssignedTo: al...@users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: bugs.mich...@gmx.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: al...@users.sourceforge.net, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-bioperl-1.6.0-1.fc11.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-bioperl-run-1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11.noarch /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Bio/ConfigData.pm /usr/share/man/man3/Bio::ConfigData.3pm.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484868] New: perl-bioperl-run : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-bioperl-run : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484868 Summary: perl-bioperl-run : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-bioperl-run AssignedTo: al...@users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: bugs.mich...@gmx.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: al...@users.sourceforge.net, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-bioperl-run-1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-bioperl-1.6.0-1.fc11.noarch /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Bio/ConfigData.pm /usr/share/man/man3/Bio::ConfigData.3pm.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484865] New: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484865 Summary: perl-Net-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: perl-Net-IPv4Addr AssignedTo: sindr...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugs.mich...@gmx.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: sindr...@fedoraproject.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora perl-Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-3.fc9.noarch in rawhide-development-i386 File conflict with: perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc11.noarch /usr/share/man/man1/ipv4calc.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file conflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 --- Comment #4 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-10 08:40:55 EDT --- Upstream is working on fixing this (which is related to an auto-generated ConfigData file in Perl): http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2009-February/029222.html and should have fixes out soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file conflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Comment #2 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-10 08:38:37 EDT --- *** Bug 484868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484868] perl-bioperl-run : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484868 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-10 08:38:37 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484495 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file conflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 --- Comment #3 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-10 08:39:15 EDT --- *** Bug 484867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484867] perl-bioperl : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484867 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-10 08:39:15 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484495 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484866] perl-Network-IPv4Addr : Conflicts with other packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484866 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2009-02-10 16:07:14 EDT --- looking into it it seems that the module was renamed years ago. the description at http://search.cpan.org/~frajulac/Net-IPv4Addr-0.10/IPv4Addr.pm for the perl module is the same as at http://search.cpan.org/~frajulac/Network-IPv4Addr-0.05/IPv4Addr.pm ill make sure that spacewalk changes to using Net::IPv4Addr not Network::IPv4Addr and EOL this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483772] SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772 Bug 483772 depends on bug 484293, which changed state. Bug 484293 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] New: perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file comflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file comflicts in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 Summary: perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file comflicts in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-bioperl AssignedTo: al...@users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: br...@wolff.to QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: al...@users.sourceforge.net, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: [r...@bruno bruno]# yum install perl-bioperl perl-bioperl-run Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, dellsysidplugin, dellsysidplugin2, keys, list- : data, priorities, protect-packages, protectbase, refresh- : packagekit, upgrade-helper, verify, versionlock 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Reading version lock configuration Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package perl-bioperl.noarch 0:1.6.0-1.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) for package: perl-bioperl --- Package perl-bioperl-run.noarch 0:1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene.noarch 0:1.091-6.fc9 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved Package Arch Version Repository Size Installing: perl-bioperl noarch 1.6.0-1.fc11 rawhide 6.0 M perl-bioperl-run noarch 1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11 rawhide 691 k Installing for dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene noarch 1.091-6.fc9 rawhide 41 k Transaction Summary Install 3 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 6.7 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Total29 MB/s | 6.7 MB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Bio/ConfigData.pm conflicts between attempted installs of perl-bioperl-1.6.0-1.fc11.noarch and perl-bioperl-run-1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11.noarch file /usr/share/man/man3/Bio::ConfigData.3pm.gz conflicts between attempted installs of perl-bioperl-1.6.0-1.fc11.noarch and perl-bioperl-run-1.5.9-0.1.1.fc11.noarch Error Summary - [r...@bruno bruno]# Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481519] HTTP::Body 1.04 in F-9, F-10?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481519 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-07 17:20:20 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Body-1.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Body'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481519] HTTP::Body 1.04 in F-9, F-10?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481519 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_DEV |ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-07 17:20:06 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Body-1.05-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-HTTP-Body'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483237] Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483237 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-07 17:24:37 EDT --- perl-Class-MOP-0.75-1.fc9, perl-Moose-0.64-1.fc9, perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers-0.14-1.fc9, perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0009-2.fc9, perl-MooseX-Params-Validate-0.07-2.fc9, perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor-0.07-3.fc9, perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear-0.02-1.fc9, perl-MooseX-Types-0.08-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Class-MOP perl-Moose perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable perl-MooseX-Params-Validate perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor perl-MooseX-Traits-Attribute-CascadeClear perl-MooseX-Types'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1496 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 484495] perl-bioperl-run and perl-bioperl have file conflicts in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484495 Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-08 02:37:52 EDT --- This appears to be an inadvertant duplication of code in the two packages introduced upstream. I have reported the error here: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2009-February/029213.html Once I know which package ConfigData should live in, I'll remove it from the other one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483772] SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772 Ian Burrell ianburr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell ianburr...@gmail.com 2009-02-05 16:54:40 EDT --- I missed that Time::Progress had been added to the requirements for the new version. I am not sure why the auto-requires script did not detect it. Or why the Makefile.PL did not fail when it wasn't present for build. I added the requirement to the spec. I submitted perl-Time-Progress for review (#484293). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483772] SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772 Ian Burrell ianburr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||484293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016
--- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com 2009-02-04 11:20:17 EDT
---
I removed ownership of ${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse
added LICENSE
did not add README since upstream (that me :) do not provide any README
Updated SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.15-1.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483772] New: SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772 Summary: SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: low Component: perl-SVK AssignedTo: ianburr...@gmail.com ReportedBy: warl...@mit.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ianburr...@gmail.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I just upgraded Fedora 10 yesterday and this morning I noticed that SVK isn't working anymore. When I try to sync I get: Can't locate Time/Progress.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SVK/Notify.pm line 214. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-SVK-2.2.1-1.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Seems to happen every time I try to use svk sync. Some other svk operations seem to work okay. Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum update (as of 2009-02-03 10:20am US/EST) 2. svk sync depotpath 3. Actual results: See above Expected results: It should sync. Additional info: I cannot find Time/Progress.pm in a package.. And indeed the perl-SVK RPM doesn't depend on perl(Time/Progress.pm) for some odd reason... Probably because the require Time/Progress.pm is within a subroutine instead of global? But this bug makes SVK practically useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483772] SVK fails because it cannot find Time/Progress.pm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483772 --- Comment #1 from Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu 2009-02-03 12:39:52 EDT --- For the record, I found, downloaded, and rebuilt perl-Time-Progress-1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm from http://rpm.mag-sol.com/Fedora/9/SRPMS/?C=N;O=D and when I installed the RPM then svk started working. So really what needs to happen is: 1) the SVK RPM needs to depend on the Time::Progress perl module, and 2) you need to distribute the Time::Progress perl module in the yum repo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483563] Pleasy sync with 0.42 version.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483563 Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmasl...@redhat.com, ||rc040...@freenet.de, ||robin.norw...@gmail.com, ||ska...@redhat.com, ||tcall...@redhat.com Component|perl-IPC-Cmd|perl AssignedTo|st...@silug.org |mmasl...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Steven Pritchard st...@silug.org 2009-02-02 09:41:52 EDT --- IPC::Cmd is supplied by the perl package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483563] New: Pleasy sync with 0.42 version.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pleasy sync with 0.42 version. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483563 Summary: Pleasy sync with 0.42 version. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-IPC-Cmd AssignedTo: st...@silug.org ReportedBy: allis...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: st...@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Hi, You can sync this package with version 0.42? I need this update for build others perl packages. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 478627] SELinux is preventing clamd.amavisd (clamd_t) search amavis_var_run_t.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478627 mgrepl mgr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh |mgr...@redhat.com |at.com, st...@silug.org | AssignedTo|st...@silug.org |mgr...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483563] Update perl-IPC-Cmd to 0.42
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483563 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|mmasl...@redhat.com |ska...@redhat.com Summary|Pleasy sync with 0.42 |Update perl-IPC-Cmd to 0.42 |version.| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-02 15:39:32 EDT --- Ralf, I respectfully disagree. Please reference https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Directory ownership is a little more complex than file ownership. Although the rule of thumb is the same: own all the directories you create but none of the directories of packages you depend on, there are several instances where it's desirable for multiple packages to own a directory. Examples of this are: snip None of the examples provided appear to be applicable to this set of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016
--- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-02 15:45:58 EDT
---
Bah, I didn't have a close look at the Perl guidelines, sorry. It's still
rather confusing, but appears to be permissible for the perl directory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Directory_Ownership for those
following along at home :)
The comment still stands about %{_sysconfdir}/nocpulse, however.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-02 23:13:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jonstan...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016
--- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-02-01 13:21:43 EDT
---
Sorry for the delay, I'd intended to take care of this Friday night. But here
it is.
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
SEE LATER - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
Not included upstream - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
$ md5sum ../../build/SOURCES/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz
perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz
b3d2897e6c4265561ce728568d2bce3d
../../build/SOURCES/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz
b3d2897e6c4265561ce728568d2bce3d perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz
N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang
N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
N/A- Doc subpackage needed/used.
No %doc files - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
-- Please include the README from upstream here, and actually the full license
N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage.
N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
N/A - .la files are removed.
N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
FAIL - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)
perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
config(perl-NOCpulse-Debug) = 1.23.13-1.fc11
perl(NOCpulse::Debug) = 1.23
perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::html)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::html_comment)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::literal)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::stdout)
perl(NOCpulse::Debuggable)
perl(NOCpulse::DependencyGraph)
perl(NOCpulse::Log::LogManager)
perl(NOCpulse::Log::Logger)
perl(NOCpulse::Log::test::TestLogger)
perl-NOCpulse-Debug = 1.23.13-1.fc11
=
config(perl-NOCpulse-Debug) = 1.23.13-1.fc11
nocpulse-common
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Carp)
perl(Class::MethodMaker)
perl(Data::Dumper)
perl(IO::Handle)
perl(NOCpulse::Config)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug)
perl(NOCpulse::Log::LogManager)
perl(NOCpulse::Log::Logger)
SHOULD Items:
OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
Didn't test - Should function as described.
No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
Please remove ownership of directories %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse and
${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse. These are both owned by nocpulse-common, which you
Require, and two packages can't own the same directories.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-02-01 22:46:36
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Please remove ownership of directories %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse and
${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse. These are both owned by nocpulse-common, which you
Require, and two packages can't own the same directories.
Jon, please make yourself familiar with the FPG.
%{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse
_must_ be owned by both packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483237] New: Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483237 Summary: Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: perl-MooseX-AttributeHelpers AssignedTo: cw...@alumni.drew.edu ReportedBy: allis...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: cw...@alumni.drew.edu, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Hi, You can make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates? There is a koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77999 I needed this version for other perl packages. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483237] Make version 0.14-1.fc9 available for F-9 updates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483237 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-01-30 12:58:46 EDT --- No problem -- due to deps, I need to put together another mass Moose update, the way I just did for F-10. I'll put that together and submit it for testing later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jonstan...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com 2009-01-30 15:52:03 EDT --- I'll take care of this this evening, hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 481519] HTTP::Body 1.04 in F-9, F-10?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481519 --- Comment #1 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 19:18:42 EDT --- Go right ahead, please do it in rawhide too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-perl-devel-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] New: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides an API for generating varying levels of debugging output on various output streams. Scratch build is without problem: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1090760 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-01-29 06:20:00 EDT --- As you are package submitter you should not change fedora‑review flag. Its reviewer who want to take it for review will change it to fedora-review? and when he want to approve package he then change it from fedora-review? to fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 465085] FTBFS perl-SVN-Mirror-0.73-3.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465085 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:02:15 EDT --- perl-SVN-Mirror-0.75-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 465085] FTBFS perl-SVN-Mirror-0.73-3.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465085 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:06:18 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475242] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Streamer - Accurately serialize a data structure as Perl code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475242 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:08:33 EDT --- perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.08-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 475427] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu - HTML::FormFu controller for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475427 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-29 18:07:10 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.03007-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
[Bug 474864] Review Request: perl-Test-Signature - Automated SIGNATURE testing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474864 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-28 11:37:37 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Test-Signature New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
