Self-introduction

[Ayrton Araújo]

Hello foss brothers,
My name is Ayrton and I am the coordinator of the web development team of
Brazilian Fedora Project Portal (http://projetofedora.org) and one of the
coordinators of Brazilian Regional Groups and I'm working on a new
enterprise based on the open source solutions on industry of web and
development.Within the fedora-websites I'd like to offer my full cooperation
and attention to the issues that are treated by the team.
Thank's for attention.

Warmest regards,

--Ayrton Araújo
Brazilian Fedora Project Ambassador
Responsável pela Infra/Web do Projeto Fedora Brasil
Coordenador do Projeto Grupos Locais
http://aaqj.fedorapeople.org/profile.html
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: please help

[Ricky Zhou]

On 2009-04-06 10:52:36 PM, Mark C. Kime wrote:
> The following header seems to be originating from your site, if it is, please
> take the privileges away from the sender. It is causing a great deal of 
> trouble for my company. Thank you
I assume you are referring to a test page similar to
http://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/8/86/ServerTestPage_httpd_test_page.png

That is a test page included with our operating system--we don't
actually control the site in question.  For more information, please
refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage.

Complaints about spam should probably be sent to the abuse address of
the site's provider.

Thanks,
Ricky


pgpe6qBaIN2Wj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: [Fedora Infrastructure] #532: get-fedora link to additional information for jigdo downloads

[Fedora Infrastructure]

#532: get-fedora link to additional information for jigdo downloads
-+--
 Reporter:  afarris  |Owner:  webmaster
 Type:  enhancement  |   Status:  new  
 Priority:  major|Milestone:   
Component:  Webmaster|  Version:   
 Severity:  Normal   |   Resolution:   
 Keywords:   |  
-+--
Changes (by mmcgrath):

  * owner:  ricky => webmaster

Comment:

 anyone on the web team want to get this?

-- 
Ticket URL: 

Fedora Infrastructure 
Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our 
source code.

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: SHA1SUM Error

[Ian Weller]

On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:14:17PM +0800, Cae Sium wrote:
> New to Fedora and downloaded
> F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
> from Fedora's official link.
> 
> 
> The contents of  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM  is:
> 
> 4950de1a6b7062e6bc99d3edf46776bf8d19506faaf4f6d3b52d5f382adc
> *F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
> 
> 
> After downloading the iso, I did a check using
> sha1sum F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
> 
> 
> and got the following output:
> a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
> 
> re-downloaded the iso,
> did the same check and got the same output:
> a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
> 
> 
> 
> Am I checking incorrectly or is the sha1sum posted on the website wrong?
> 

Fedora 11 and later use SHA256SUMs. You can use "sha256sum file.iso" to
get the correct sum.

-- 
Ian Weller 
GnuPG fingerprint:  E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226  B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36


pgpDDrPceifIL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Make x86_64 more visible or even the default choice

[drago01]

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Kamisamanou Burgess
 wrote:
> Maybe not the default choice. x86_64 only accounts for about %25 of Fedora
> users according to Smolt.

Well if you hide it most users will just download the x86 version
(that's what has always been the case, which results into this smolt
stats).

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Make x86_64 more visible or even the default choice

[Rahul Sundaram]

drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Kamisamanou Burgess
>  wrote:
>> Maybe not the default choice. x86_64 only accounts for about %25 of Fedora
>> users according to Smolt.
> 
> Well if you hide it most users will just download the x86 version
> (that's what has always been the case, which results into this smolt
> stats).

It has not been always the case. We didn't have a single choice before
but multiple links which is now what you get when you click on get all
download option.

Rahul

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Make x86_64 more visible or even the default choice

[Rahul Sundaram]

Kamisamanou Burgess wrote:
> Maybe not the default choice. x86_64 only accounts for about %25 of
> Fedora users according to Smolt.

The current choices do not always indicate future direction. The
question is what do we want to push towards? It isn't clear to me that
x86_64 has clear cut advantages over x86 for regular desktop users. I
rather get FESCo to answer that.

Rahul

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Make x86_64 more visible or even the default choice

[Kamisamanou Burgess]

Maybe not the default choice. x86_64 only accounts for about %25 of Fedora
users according to Smolt.

Sayonara,
Kamisamanou Burgess
http://www.kamisamanou.net


On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 07:17, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> drago01 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently the website focuses on the x86 version of fedora and the
> > x86_64 version is hidden so unless the user knows that he is searching
> > for it, he will just download the x86 version.
> > We should promote the x86_64 as the default choice with a visible link
> > "For older PCs and Netbooks click *here*" (More information)".
> >
> > In F11 effort was made to change the default x86 arch from i386 to
> > i586 to gain extra performance, but benchmarks that I have done back
> > than have clearly showed that you gain much more from moving moving to
> > x86_64.
> > Not only that you have access to more registers MMX, SSE and SSE2 can
> > be used unconditionally.
>
> Can we get a recommendation from FESCo?
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
>
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

[Paolo Leoni]

2009/4/6 Nicu Buculei 

>>I would include a few pixels from the pedestal, not being very happy with
how the drawing is touching the bottom edge. >>Maybe also move the "coming
soon" text 1 or 2px lower and maybe also the number of days a bit to the
right and bottom.

This is the corrected version, could be ok? Anyway thank you for your
feedbacks.

https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/3/39/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1b.svg
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/3/38/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1b.png

>>CC-BY is OK.
>>Not sure, crediting the author in the "PromoBanners" wiki page is enough
from a legal point of view? one have to seriously >>dig in the wiki in order
to find it.

I think that in "legal terms" crediting the author in the "PromoBanners"
wiki is correct, but I haven't the certainty about it.

Martin Sourada wrote:



> >>I'm wondering why nicu hadn't mentioned this (at least on the

>>-art-list), but you might be interested in this one as well:

>
>> http://blog.berkenpies.nl/2009/04/02/fedora-11-countdown-counter-part-2/
>>
>

> >>It's much closer to the graphics we'll probably go with for the release
> >>so it might be better to use it...
>

I think we can use wallpaper image for the "release banner"...in this way we
can have more variety on the homepage.


-- 
Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Make x86_64 more visible or even the default choice

[Rahul Sundaram]

drago01 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently the website focuses on the x86 version of fedora and the
> x86_64 version is hidden so unless the user knows that he is searching
> for it, he will just download the x86 version.
> We should promote the x86_64 as the default choice with a visible link
> "For older PCs and Netbooks click *here*" (More information)".
> 
> In F11 effort was made to change the default x86 arch from i386 to
> i586 to gain extra performance, but benchmarks that I have done back
> than have clearly showed that you gain much more from moving moving to
> x86_64.
> Not only that you have access to more registers MMX, SSE and SSE2 can
> be used unconditionally.

Can we get a recommendation from FESCo?

Rahul

-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

[Martin Sourada]

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 19:37 +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:
> In the past days some people have requested a F11 countdown banner for
> a blog using.
> 
> So, below you can find a proposal:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/b/b7/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.png
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/0/00/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.svg
> 
> The original background image was downloaded from here:
> 
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonythemisfit/3387589463/sizes/o/
> 
> License seems to be ok for Fedora.
> 
> Feedbacks are welcome.
> 
I'm wondering why nicu hadn't mentioned this (at least on the
-art-list), but you might be interested in this one as well:

http://blog.berkenpies.nl/2009/04/02/fedora-11-countdown-counter-part-2/

It's much closer to the graphics we'll probably go with for the release
so it might be better to use it...

Martin


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

SHA1SUM Error

[Cae Sium]

New to Fedora and downloaded
F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
from Fedora's official link.


The contents of  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM  is:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

4950de1a6b7062e6bc99d3edf46776bf8d19506faaf4f6d3b52d5f382adc
*F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBSc1NdR3Fx1jSLnfyAQKoZBAApXIJHRSyKW4IGSVpZ9mMCE3Ju6zse9k8
nHvXH9QLIYGRrCxRNvsQy8tXW0owsUFzAqrXmTuB+D8uRnVVcAPQABD4JXpd2AR2
QG8KkGEUxyUejTxM5avoAme5a2KPszGWpHTh7SQxJfyzFWqgEpd/E1HHLCu//rij
g7lBRjpDz6mXz5ZVO8EQ6K2yOscerco/yMglR4fGwAo+483CtRSNz60ePReqXWq1
WS5ksTlUDfHU2zXoGR8et/pu1CZ//x0jQKc21ZXGEflO0qJm/aj7N5amedlPnV//
b3hfPOTQfmc0kyzM/Zq+fDbwqJDd5mR5Dq14oOzakNlGYx2eCRVxnuwum3MvNmKh
QwNhlyf9RxCp1bzvpzFWZjuTSuGDuFFiG7LOnDW3ZouvkyVHwQ7ZbUacMienU2b2
oGCyBRYoRc78Qa5m+RD/8AR505p2mFs9+Ut0KnMj2+WL7lckj6ebcN9Qb3lmv+a/
DNEPMErPvrZK2/D9qTZt5igT6HfnIsc2eMqJmQUixNTEwZZpLnoc3KUDy76JIQ9m
m2IUtzNgA3SXu6ODvDNsMJijttfFBJ/pMJ8qs9PAcw/zge+4qIRKE0iWZMapwngN
xAQGu/m2RfPWAqWndv/5F2myDVAGDcbfPcNuTo6k54jY9CxpbVs/yqlTPrYzzkNz
oKxCbwJ/IXI=
=wURW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


After downloading the iso, I did a check using
sha1sum F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso


and got the following output:
a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso

re-downloaded the iso,
did the same check and got the same output:
a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01  F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso



Am I checking incorrectly or is the sha1sum posted on the website wrong?


Appreciate some advice.


Thanks.
-- 
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

[Nicu Buculei]

Martin Sourada wrote:

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 19:37 +0200, Paolo Leoni wrote:

In the past days some people have requested a F11 countdown banner for
a blog using.

So, below you can find a proposal:

https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/b/b7/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.png
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/0/00/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.svg


I'm wondering why nicu hadn't mentioned this (at least on the
-art-list), but you might be interested in this one as well:

http://blog.berkenpies.nl/2009/04/02/fedora-11-countdown-counter-part-2/


A talk on the websites list about that banner triggered Paolo to hurry 
with the counter, as it seems we already receive requests.



It's much closer to the graphics we'll probably go with for the release
so it might be better to use it...


My guess is Paolo went for something more generic as the wallpaper is 
still under development and we don't have a rule to use the same 
graphic, is the same metaphor (only for "Solar" we had exactly the same 
image).


I like the image from the linked blog, I commented and helped the author 
to improve it, butt it does not fit our layout, has to be adapted/changed.


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

--
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list

Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

[Nicu Buculei]

Paolo Leoni wrote:
In the past days some people have requested a F11 countdown banner for a 
blog using.


So, below you can find a proposal:

https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/b/b7/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.png
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/0/00/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banner_1a.svg


I would include a few pixels from the pedestal, not being very happy 
with how the drawing is touching the bottom edge. Maybe also move the 
"coming soon" text 1 or 2px lower and maybe also the number of days a 
bit to the right and bottom.



The original background image was downloaded from here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonythemisfit/3387589463/sizes/o/

License seems to be ok for Fedora.


CC-BY is OK.
Not sure, crediting the author in the "PromoBanners" wiki page is enough 
from a legal point of view? one have to seriously dig in the wiki in 
order to find it.



--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

--
Fedora-websites-list mailing list
Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list