Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Flushing while decoding , but need already decoded frames

2024-05-24 Thread Michael Henrik Bodenhoff via ffmpeg-devel
Hi Andrey ,

"when the decoder is set up to ignore B frames"

How do you do that ? 

We must have missed something while we tried using FFmpeg, because we couldn't 
find a way of telling the decoder to ignore B frames, we actually got so 
desperate that we considered if it was possible to modify the incoming encoded 
stream to make FFmpeg believe that the stream doesn't contain B frames ☹

Michael Bodenhoff
Principal Software Engineer

FT01

Email: m...@milestone.dk
-Original Message-
From: ffmpeg-devel  On Behalf Of Andrey Turkin
Sent: 24. maj 2024 13:39
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches 
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Flushing while decoding , but need already decoded 
frames

[You don't often get email from andrey.tur...@gmail.com. Learn why this is 
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Have to say, this issue has been a long grievance of mine. There is no reason 
to delay frames when the decoder is set up to ignore B frames as there is no 
reordering to be done; ideally this should be zero-delay case (packet goes in, 
frame goes out) yet the most common decoders delay frames anyway, as if to 
decode B frames. Moreover, with the "new" send/receive API I think there is no 
reason to delay frames at all - a single send_packet could decode and queue 
multiple frames to be received, so it makes sense to send frames as soon as 
possible - yet that is not the case as well.

пт, 24 мая 2024 г. в 13:17, Andreas Rheinhardt :
>
> Michael Henrik Bodenhoff via ffmpeg-devel:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > my team recently had to abandon switching to using FFmpeg from
> > specific decoder implementations (NvDEC, Intel Media SDK , IPP and
> > quite a few codec specific decoders) because of big performance
> > issues because of the way FFmpeg works….. or at least we think it is
> > (we’re FFmpeg noobs   )
> >
> > It's actually an issue we also had with Intel Media SDK,  leading us to pay 
> > Intel to extend Media SDK to do what we needed.
> >
> > Our product is a video surveillance system, and that means we have to 
> > decode a LOT of video streams simultaneously.
> >
> > For motion detection we want to only decode keyframes, and skip P and B 
> > frames , and that works fine with FFmpeg most of the time, except for when 
> > the video stream contains B frames.
> > Without B-Frames it’s really simple (simplified pseudocode) :
> >
> > while(true)
> > {
> >   receiveStreamCompleteFrame();
> >   If(KeyFrame)
> >   {
> > avcodec_send_packet();
> > if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
> > {
> >// do motion detection
> > }
> >   }
> > }
> >
> > But! with B Frames FFmpeg doesn’t return keyframes when they are decoded, 
> > they are kept, and we can’t seem to flush them out. avcodec_flush_buffers 
> > allow us to continue to next keyframe, but it doesn’t seem to give us the 
> > keyframe we just gave to FFmpeg with avcodec_send_packet.
> >
> > while(true)
> > {
> >   receiveStreamCompleteFrame();
> >   If(KeyFrame)
> >   {
> > avcodec_send_packet();
> > if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
> > {
> >// do motion detection
> > }
> > Else
> > {
> >   avcodec_flush_buffers();
> >   if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
> >   {
> >  // do motion detection
> >   }
> > }
> >   }
> > }
> >
> > Calling avcodec_receive_frame after calling avcodec_flush_buffer
> > results in -11 and no frame
> >
> > is there anyway around this ? And if not, could FFmpeg be made to have this 
> > functionality ?
> >
> > I tried contacting one of the FFmpeg consultants from
> > https://ff/
> > mpeg.org%2Fconsulting.html=05%7C02%7Cmibo%40milestone.dk%7C46bc
> > b557d2194eb8b76d08dc7be63528%7C4744e4b2072d4754be71250b45e049fe%7C0%
> > 7C0%7C638521475866379714%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDA
> > iLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C=H
> > V8bPZyvDklo5iGs%2BnrW4uEJ6m%2B9tOExcyvt8W3VxyQ%3D=0 but
> > never got a response
> >
>
> Send your packet with the keyframe, send a NULL packet (to signal
> EOF), then the internally stored frames should be output by
> avcodec_receive_frame(). Then flush the decoder (to be able to send
> new packets to it).
>
> - Andreas
>
> ___
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmp/
> eg.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fffmpeg-devel=05%7C02%7Cmibo%40miles
> tone.dk%7C46bcb557d2194eb8b76d08dc7be63528%7C4744e4b2072d4754be71250b4
> 5e049f

[FFmpeg-devel] Flushing while decoding , but need already decoded frames

2024-05-24 Thread Michael Henrik Bodenhoff via ffmpeg-devel
Hi ,

my team recently had to abandon switching to using FFmpeg from specific decoder 
implementations (NvDEC, Intel Media SDK , IPP and quite a few codec specific 
decoders) because of big performance issues because of the way FFmpeg works….. 
or at least we think it is (we’re FFmpeg noobs   )

It's actually an issue we also had with Intel Media SDK,  leading us to pay 
Intel to extend Media SDK to do what we needed.

Our product is a video surveillance system, and that means we have to decode a 
LOT of video streams simultaneously.

For motion detection we want to only decode keyframes, and skip P and B frames 
, and that works fine with FFmpeg most of the time, except for when the video 
stream contains B frames.
Without B-Frames it’s really simple (simplified pseudocode) :

while(true)
{
  receiveStreamCompleteFrame();
  If(KeyFrame)
  {
avcodec_send_packet();
if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
{
   // do motion detection
}
  }
}

But! with B Frames FFmpeg doesn’t return keyframes when they are decoded, they 
are kept, and we can’t seem to flush them out. avcodec_flush_buffers allow us 
to continue to next keyframe, but it doesn’t seem to give us the keyframe we 
just gave to FFmpeg with avcodec_send_packet.

while(true)
{
  receiveStreamCompleteFrame();
  If(KeyFrame)
  {
avcodec_send_packet();
if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
{
   // do motion detection
}
Else
{
  avcodec_flush_buffers();
  if(avcodec_receive_frame()==0)
  {
 // do motion detection
  }
}
  }
}

Calling avcodec_receive_frame after calling avcodec_flush_buffer results in -11 
and no frame

is there anyway around this ? And if not, could FFmpeg be made to have this 
functionality ?

I tried contacting one of the FFmpeg consultants from 
https://ffmpeg.org/consulting.html but never got a response

Michael Bodenhoff
Principal Software Engineer
FT01
Email: m...@milestone.dk

[Linkedin Logo][Twitter 
Logo][Youtube 
Logo][Facebook 
Logo][Instagram 
Logo]

[Milestone Logo]

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".