[FFmpeg-devel] patch for x32 for libpostproc
Hi, as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at least I got it to build. As requested, the patch I used is attached. It’s not optimal as the arch could use the wider registers, but probably good enough, should it do what it’s supposed to ;-) bye, //mirabilos ① https://wiki.debian.org/X32Port -- “ah that reminds me, thanks for the stellar entertainment that you and certain other people provide on the Debian mailing lists │ sole reason I subscribed to them (I'm not using Debian anywhere) is the entertainment factor │ Debian does not strike me as a place for good humour, much less German admin-style humour”# DP: Port to x32 # DP: There is no GCC documentation about the asm præficēs except # DP: in http://stackoverflow.com/a/17825185/2171120 – go figure… --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ ARCH_LIST=' sparc sparc64 tomi +x32 x86 x86_32 x86_64 @@ -2190,7 +2191,9 @@ case "$arch" in check_cc <___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Yes, the Linux kernel is a successful project. Does this mean using a > list for reviewing patches is a good thing? No! The workflow with a list > is simply horrible. Using git-review and gerrit is so much better. Strong NAK here. First: it breaks the medium used (eMail vs. web). Second: Gerrit is an accessibility nightmare, not just for people using Lynx, but also for those who do have the required webbloatser at hand… and it recently got even worse. Having less points where information is exchanged is Good™. bye, //mirabilos, speaking from contributor experience in many projects -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"... ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian
Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > * Do you intend to replace Libav by FFmpeg in Debian? >No, there is no need to replace anything as long as it is maintained. >Currently the main goal is to give multimedia maintainers a choice >between the two sets of libraries to link against, and our users the >choice to use the 'ffmpeg' utility. That is possible, because the >packages are co-installable. (Only the *-dev packages conflict.) Hm, I wonder if this will work, see the JPEG discussion. But I'd *love* to see ffmpeg replace libav and to get my mplayer back, which is currently on hold. Thanks, //mirabilos ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
