Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
Jan Ekström: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:47 AM Jan Ekström wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:13 AM Jan Ekström wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:59 AM Jan Ekström wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:53 PM Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > > Jan Ekström: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: >>> >>> From: Jan Ekström >>> >>> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually >>> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. >>> >>> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over >>> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is >>> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and >>> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either >>> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström >> >> Ping. >> >> Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will >> soon move towards applying this. >> >> My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket >> was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but >> apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being >> planned, so I decided to not to. >> >> Best regards, >> Jan > > Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have > already been converted to the desired timebase? Back when I found this issue in this function that aligns the time bases and writes the packet on the underlying avformat context, I did not think of that, but I did think of reversing the time base scaling in case of failure. That I then opted not to do due to possibly being inaccurate unless I saved all of those values from the AVPacket that av_packet_rescale_ts touches. Thus, I settled on just utilizing a reference/copy for the actual muxing, so that it could be easily discarded and the original AVPacket's values were not lost. > (Or why not just copy > the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so > that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always operate.) This one sounds more like the correct way in the end, if possible. My attempt for now was to just fix an issue within the current logic (time base handling in case of failure was forgotten). I am trying to remind myself at which point the AVStreams should no longer be poked/modified as far as time base is concerned... init or header? init seems to call init_pts in libavformat/mux.c, so my initial guesstimate is that where fifo.c is currently doing its things (fifo_mux_init), you could just add the time base sync. Most API clients tend to call only avformat_write_header so in that sense with various API clients you probably wouldn't even notice the difference :) . >>> >>> So I just double-checked the docs in avformat.h, and the point of >>> update given to the API user is the header writing, which in the fifo >>> muxer is being done asynchronously in its own thread. We would have to >>> basically make fifo_write_header wait until the first time >>> avformat_write_header gets successfully called in >>> fifo_thread_write_header. >>> >>> While possible - and could make the time base juggling unnecessary - >>> not sure if it would be my first attempt. :) I'd probably first want >>> to get the time base logic fixed since that would be limited to >>> fifo_thread_write_packet. >>> >>> If there were question marks on why I utilized a separate reference >>> AVPacket, it was mostly to keep the time related values original in >>> the fed AVPacket, thus backing up all of the time values that >>> av_packet_rescale_ts might touch (if new time fields were to be added >>> to AVPacket, and modified by av_packet_rescale_ts, then the code would >>> have to be updated if I had just backed up the values manually and >>> then passed them back). In addition to possibly causing a new buffer >>> to be allocated in case of a non-refcounted buffer (although the fifo >>> muxer does do an av_packet_ref for all input packets, so everything >>> fed in through the worker thread should be reference counted), It does >>> cause the side data etc to be copied as well, which is of course >>> unfortunate. In the testing that was done this did not seem to cause >>> major issues, though. >>> >>> If someone feels heavily about this, I can of course write >>> ff_packet_copy_ts(AVPacket *dst, const AVPacket *src), which could >>> then be utilized against the dummy AVPacket. >>> >> >> Ping on this case. >> >> 1. Currently since fifo muxer seems to already generate a refcounted >> AVPacket when taking in an AVPacket, doing another av_packet_ref is >> indeed overkill, but does not seem to be a too big of an overhead >> (esp. since done asynchronously), and
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:47 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:13 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:59 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:53 PM Andreas Rheinhardt > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Jan Ekström: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> From: Jan Ekström > > > > >> > > > > >> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually > > > > >> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. > > > > >> > > > > >> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over > > > > >> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is > > > > >> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and > > > > >> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either > > > > >> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). > > > > >> > > > > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström > > > > > > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > > > > > Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will > > > > > soon move towards applying this. > > > > > > > > > > My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket > > > > > was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but > > > > > apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being > > > > > planned, so I decided to not to. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have > > > > already been converted to the desired timebase? > > > > > > Back when I found this issue in this function that aligns the time > > > bases and writes the packet on the underlying avformat context, I did > > > not think of that, but I did think of reversing the time base scaling > > > in case of failure. That I then opted not to do due to possibly being > > > inaccurate unless I saved all of those values from the AVPacket that > > > av_packet_rescale_ts touches. Thus, I settled on just utilizing a > > > reference/copy for the actual muxing, so that it could be easily > > > discarded and the original AVPacket's values were not lost. > > > > > > > (Or why not just copy > > > > the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so > > > > that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always > > > > operate.) > > > > > > This one sounds more like the correct way in the end, if possible. My > > > attempt for now was to just fix an issue within the current logic > > > (time base handling in case of failure was forgotten). I am trying to > > > remind myself at which point the AVStreams should no longer be > > > poked/modified as far as time base is concerned... init or header? > > > init seems to call init_pts in libavformat/mux.c, so my initial > > > guesstimate is that where fifo.c is currently doing its things > > > (fifo_mux_init), you could just add the time base sync. Most API > > > clients tend to call only avformat_write_header so in that sense with > > > various API clients you probably wouldn't even notice the difference > > > :) . > > > > So I just double-checked the docs in avformat.h, and the point of > > update given to the API user is the header writing, which in the fifo > > muxer is being done asynchronously in its own thread. We would have to > > basically make fifo_write_header wait until the first time > > avformat_write_header gets successfully called in > > fifo_thread_write_header. > > > > While possible - and could make the time base juggling unnecessary - > > not sure if it would be my first attempt. :) I'd probably first want > > to get the time base logic fixed since that would be limited to > > fifo_thread_write_packet. > > > > If there were question marks on why I utilized a separate reference > > AVPacket, it was mostly to keep the time related values original in > > the fed AVPacket, thus backing up all of the time values that > > av_packet_rescale_ts might touch (if new time fields were to be added > > to AVPacket, and modified by av_packet_rescale_ts, then the code would > > have to be updated if I had just backed up the values manually and > > then passed them back). In addition to possibly causing a new buffer > > to be allocated in case of a non-refcounted buffer (although the fifo > > muxer does do an av_packet_ref for all input packets, so everything > > fed in through the worker thread should be reference counted), It does > > cause the side data etc to be copied as well, which is of course > > unfortunate. In the testing that was done this did not seem to cause > > major issues, though. > > > > If someone feels heavily about this, I can of course write > > ff_packet_copy_ts(AVPacket *dst, const AVPacket *src), which could > > then be utilized against the dummy AVPacket. > > > > Ping on this case. > > 1. Currently since fifo muxer seems to already generate a refcounted > AVPacket when taking in an AVPacket, doing another av_packet_ref is
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:13 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:59 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:53 PM Andreas Rheinhardt > > wrote: > > > > > > Jan Ekström: > > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: > > > >> > > > >> From: Jan Ekström > > > >> > > > >> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually > > > >> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. > > > >> > > > >> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over > > > >> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is > > > >> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and > > > >> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either > > > >> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström > > > > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > > > Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will > > > > soon move towards applying this. > > > > > > > > My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket > > > > was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but > > > > apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being > > > > planned, so I decided to not to. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jan > > > > > > Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have > > > already been converted to the desired timebase? > > > > Back when I found this issue in this function that aligns the time > > bases and writes the packet on the underlying avformat context, I did > > not think of that, but I did think of reversing the time base scaling > > in case of failure. That I then opted not to do due to possibly being > > inaccurate unless I saved all of those values from the AVPacket that > > av_packet_rescale_ts touches. Thus, I settled on just utilizing a > > reference/copy for the actual muxing, so that it could be easily > > discarded and the original AVPacket's values were not lost. > > > > > (Or why not just copy > > > the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so > > > that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always operate.) > > > > This one sounds more like the correct way in the end, if possible. My > > attempt for now was to just fix an issue within the current logic > > (time base handling in case of failure was forgotten). I am trying to > > remind myself at which point the AVStreams should no longer be > > poked/modified as far as time base is concerned... init or header? > > init seems to call init_pts in libavformat/mux.c, so my initial > > guesstimate is that where fifo.c is currently doing its things > > (fifo_mux_init), you could just add the time base sync. Most API > > clients tend to call only avformat_write_header so in that sense with > > various API clients you probably wouldn't even notice the difference > > :) . > > So I just double-checked the docs in avformat.h, and the point of > update given to the API user is the header writing, which in the fifo > muxer is being done asynchronously in its own thread. We would have to > basically make fifo_write_header wait until the first time > avformat_write_header gets successfully called in > fifo_thread_write_header. > > While possible - and could make the time base juggling unnecessary - > not sure if it would be my first attempt. :) I'd probably first want > to get the time base logic fixed since that would be limited to > fifo_thread_write_packet. > > If there were question marks on why I utilized a separate reference > AVPacket, it was mostly to keep the time related values original in > the fed AVPacket, thus backing up all of the time values that > av_packet_rescale_ts might touch (if new time fields were to be added > to AVPacket, and modified by av_packet_rescale_ts, then the code would > have to be updated if I had just backed up the values manually and > then passed them back). In addition to possibly causing a new buffer > to be allocated in case of a non-refcounted buffer (although the fifo > muxer does do an av_packet_ref for all input packets, so everything > fed in through the worker thread should be reference counted), It does > cause the side data etc to be copied as well, which is of course > unfortunate. In the testing that was done this did not seem to cause > major issues, though. > > If someone feels heavily about this, I can of course write > ff_packet_copy_ts(AVPacket *dst, const AVPacket *src), which could > then be utilized against the dummy AVPacket. > Ping on this case. 1. Currently since fifo muxer seems to already generate a refcounted AVPacket when taking in an AVPacket, doing another av_packet_ref is indeed overkill, but does not seem to be a too big of an overhead (esp. since done asynchronously), and makes sure all of the relevant timestamp fields are backed up (since they were actually not touched at all in the original reference). Additionally, there
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:59 AM Jan Ekström wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:53 PM Andreas Rheinhardt > wrote: > > > > Jan Ekström: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: > > >> > > >> From: Jan Ekström > > >> > > >> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually > > >> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. > > >> > > >> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over > > >> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is > > >> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and > > >> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either > > >> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström > > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will > > > soon move towards applying this. > > > > > > My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket > > > was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but > > > apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being > > > planned, so I decided to not to. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Jan > > > > Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have > > already been converted to the desired timebase? > > Back when I found this issue in this function that aligns the time > bases and writes the packet on the underlying avformat context, I did > not think of that, but I did think of reversing the time base scaling > in case of failure. That I then opted not to do due to possibly being > inaccurate unless I saved all of those values from the AVPacket that > av_packet_rescale_ts touches. Thus, I settled on just utilizing a > reference/copy for the actual muxing, so that it could be easily > discarded and the original AVPacket's values were not lost. > > > (Or why not just copy > > the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so > > that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always operate.) > > This one sounds more like the correct way in the end, if possible. My > attempt for now was to just fix an issue within the current logic > (time base handling in case of failure was forgotten). I am trying to > remind myself at which point the AVStreams should no longer be > poked/modified as far as time base is concerned... init or header? > init seems to call init_pts in libavformat/mux.c, so my initial > guesstimate is that where fifo.c is currently doing its things > (fifo_mux_init), you could just add the time base sync. Most API > clients tend to call only avformat_write_header so in that sense with > various API clients you probably wouldn't even notice the difference > :) . So I just double-checked the docs in avformat.h, and the point of update given to the API user is the header writing, which in the fifo muxer is being done asynchronously in its own thread. We would have to basically make fifo_write_header wait until the first time avformat_write_header gets successfully called in fifo_thread_write_header. While possible - and could make the time base juggling unnecessary - not sure if it would be my first attempt. :) I'd probably first want to get the time base logic fixed since that would be limited to fifo_thread_write_packet. If there were question marks on why I utilized a separate reference AVPacket, it was mostly to keep the time related values original in the fed AVPacket, thus backing up all of the time values that av_packet_rescale_ts might touch (if new time fields were to be added to AVPacket, and modified by av_packet_rescale_ts, then the code would have to be updated if I had just backed up the values manually and then passed them back). In addition to possibly causing a new buffer to be allocated in case of a non-refcounted buffer (although the fifo muxer does do an av_packet_ref for all input packets, so everything fed in through the worker thread should be reference counted), It does cause the side data etc to be copied as well, which is of course unfortunate. In the testing that was done this did not seem to cause major issues, though. If someone feels heavily about this, I can of course write ff_packet_copy_ts(AVPacket *dst, const AVPacket *src), which could then be utilized against the dummy AVPacket. Jan Jan ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:53 PM Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > > Jan Ekström: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: > >> > >> From: Jan Ekström > >> > >> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually > >> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. > >> > >> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over > >> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is > >> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and > >> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either > >> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström > > > > Ping. > > > > Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will > > soon move towards applying this. > > > > My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket > > was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but > > apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being > > planned, so I decided to not to. > > > > Best regards, > > Jan > > Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have > already been converted to the desired timebase? Back when I found this issue in this function that aligns the time bases and writes the packet on the underlying avformat context, I did not think of that, but I did think of reversing the time base scaling in case of failure. That I then opted not to do due to possibly being inaccurate unless I saved all of those values from the AVPacket that av_packet_rescale_ts touches. Thus, I settled on just utilizing a reference/copy for the actual muxing, so that it could be easily discarded and the original AVPacket's values were not lost. > (Or why not just copy > the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so > that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always operate.) This one sounds more like the correct way in the end, if possible. My attempt for now was to just fix an issue within the current logic (time base handling in case of failure was forgotten). I am trying to remind myself at which point the AVStreams should no longer be poked/modified as far as time base is concerned... init or header? init seems to call init_pts in libavformat/mux.c, so my initial guesstimate is that where fifo.c is currently doing its things (fifo_mux_init), you could just add the time base sync. Most API clients tend to call only avformat_write_header so in that sense with various API clients you probably wouldn't even notice the difference :) . Jan ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
Jan Ekström: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: >> >> From: Jan Ekström >> >> This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually >> undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. >> >> Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over >> and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is >> attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and >> the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either >> becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström > > Ping. > > Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will > soon move towards applying this. > > My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket > was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but > apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being > planned, so I decided to not to. > > Best regards, > Jan Can't you just record (in FifoMessage) whether the timestamps have already been converted to the desired timebase? (Or why not just copy the timebase chosen by the internal muxer to the user-visible stream so that we don't even have to convert it? This is how muxers always operate.) - Andreas ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Jan Ekström wrote: > > From: Jan Ekström > > This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually > undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry. > > Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over > and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is > attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and > the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either > becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström Ping. Unless someone finds some disgruntling points in this patch, I will soon move towards applying this. My initial plan was to make a simplified v2 where the output AVPacket was on stack limited to the fifo_thread_write_packet context, but apparently gradual removal of stack usage of AVPackets is being planned, so I decided to not to. Best regards, Jan ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/fifo: utilize a clone packet for muxing
From: Jan Ekström
This way the timestamp adjustments do not have to be manually
undone in case of failure and need to recover/retry.
Fixes an issue where the timestamp adjustment would be re-done over
and over again when recovery by muxing the same AVPacket again is
attempted. Would become visible if the fifo muxer's time base and
the output muxer's time base do not match (by the value either
becoming smaller and smaller, or larger and larger).
Signed-off-by: Jan Ekström
---
libavformat/fifo.c | 39 ++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/fifo.c b/libavformat/fifo.c
index 17748e94ce..aa8bea6d5a 100644
--- a/libavformat/fifo.c
+++ b/libavformat/fifo.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ typedef struct FifoContext {
int queue_size;
AVThreadMessageQueue *queue;
+AVPacket *out_pkt;
+
pthread_t writer_thread;
/* Return value of last write_trailer_call */
@@ -181,6 +183,7 @@ static int fifo_thread_write_packet(FifoThreadContext *ctx,
AVPacket *pkt)
AVFormatContext *avf = ctx->avf;
FifoContext *fifo = avf->priv_data;
AVFormatContext *avf2 = fifo->avf;
+AVPacket *out_pkt = fifo->out_pkt;
AVRational src_tb, dst_tb;
int ret, s_idx;
@@ -198,14 +201,34 @@ static int fifo_thread_write_packet(FifoThreadContext
*ctx, AVPacket *pkt)
}
}
-s_idx = pkt->stream_index;
+// We will be muxing a packet, so clone it by utilizing references.
+// This way we do not have to undo any of the tweaking for timestamps etc
+// that we are doing in this function in case another attempt through
+// recovery is required.
+if ((ret = av_packet_ref(out_pkt, pkt)) < 0) {
+av_log(avf, AV_LOG_ERROR,
+ "Error creating a new reference for output packet (%s)!\n",
+ av_err2str(ret));
+return ret;
+}
+
+s_idx = out_pkt->stream_index;
src_tb = avf->streams[s_idx]->time_base;
dst_tb = avf2->streams[s_idx]->time_base;
-av_packet_rescale_ts(pkt, src_tb, dst_tb);
-ret = av_write_frame(avf2, pkt);
-if (ret >= 0)
-av_packet_unref(pkt);
+av_packet_rescale_ts(out_pkt, src_tb, dst_tb);
+
+ret = av_write_frame(avf2, out_pkt);
+
+// Always clear the output packet, as we have no more use for it.
+av_packet_unref(out_pkt);
+
+if (ret < 0)
+return ret;
+
+// We hit success, unref the actual source packet.
+av_packet_unref(pkt);
+
return ret;
}
@@ -525,6 +548,11 @@ static int fifo_init(AVFormatContext *avf)
return ret;
}
+if (!(fifo->out_pkt = av_packet_alloc())) {
+av_log(avf, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Failed to allocate output packet!\n");
+return AVERROR(ENOMEM);
+}
+
ret = fifo_mux_init(avf, oformat, avf->url);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -650,6 +678,7 @@ static void fifo_deinit(AVFormatContext *avf)
av_thread_message_queue_free(>queue);
if (fifo->overflow_flag_lock_initialized)
pthread_mutex_destroy(>overflow_flag_lock);
+av_packet_free(>out_pkt);
}
#define OFFSET(x) offsetof(FifoContext, x)
--
2.29.2
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
