Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Patches For 2.6 Branch

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:25:07PM +1100, Micah Galizia wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I had some code accepted on the master branch and I was wondering if
 they'd be suitable for inclusion in the 2.6 branch. I'd like them in
 the next version of xmbc. The commits were:
 
 c59654d67d1afde3fac24021ef0fd9d18cf38455
 fca085187940a169b7a43d096009f7dac315f9ac
 7859618affe574c9de7f240d2ddc016f917c37bd
 

 Assuming they make sense (I'd view them as fixes, not features), do I
 just merge them into the 2.6 branch and resubmit?

yes you can
or you can just backport them in a public git repo and post a link
to the git branch to be merged.

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being
governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

[FFmpeg-devel] Patches For 2.6 Branch

[Micah Galizia]

Hi,

I had some code accepted on the master branch and I was wondering if
they'd be suitable for inclusion in the 2.6 branch. I'd like them in
the next version of xmbc. The commits were:

c59654d67d1afde3fac24021ef0fd9d18cf38455
fca085187940a169b7a43d096009f7dac315f9ac
7859618affe574c9de7f240d2ddc016f917c37bd

Assuming they make sense (I'd view them as fixes, not features), do I
just merge them into the 2.6 branch and resubmit?
-- 
The mark of an immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a
cause, while the mark of the mature man is that he wants to live
humbly for one.   --W. Stekel
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel