Re: [FFmpeg-user] Out of virtual memory (swap, I assume) = telecine+setpts combination
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:02 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 02/04/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > Well, perhaps your command queues too much frame and that is bad. > > Perhaps? > > Perhaps not. I just checked telecine+setpts with your arguments and it leaks 0 bytes. > ffmpeg -i source.mkv -map 0 -filter_complex "telecine, > setpts=N*1001/3/TB" -codec:v libx265 > -x265-params crf=20:qcomp=0.60 -codec:a copy -codec:s copy "with both > telecine and setpts.mkv" > > What does "...perhaps your command queues too much frame" mean? > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:34 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfili...@bog.us> > > wrote: > > > >> On 02/03/2021 12:23 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > >>> On 2/2/2021 2:52 PM, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > If that's true, what's eating the swap? Transcoding parts 1, 2, 3, & 4 > >> all succeeded when running > concurrently. Transcoding part 5 fails, even when ffmpeg is the only > >> app running. > >>> > >>> Out of curiosity, have you tried looking at the file with an mkv > >> analyzer like MediaInfo, Elecard's > >>> analyzer* or maybe another one? (Is there metadata towards the end of > >> the file containing junk info?) > >>> > >>> How does it behave if you drop the minterpolate or one of the other > >> filters, output to a null file, > >>> or use a different output codec? (Anything to try isolating the > problem.) > >> > >> If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory > >> leak, then the telecine filter > >> has a memory leak. > >> > >> **WRONG** > >> > >> OHMYGOD! The problem isn't telecine. The problem isn't setpts. The > problem > >> is telecine + setpts in > >> combination! > >> > >> **CORRECTION** > >> If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory > >> leak, then the combination of > >> telecine and setpts filters provokes a memory leak. > >> > >> My trouble packet is 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip'. I can't put it > in > >> dropbox because dropbox > >> has now added a 100 MB limit in an attempt to force me to pay. > >> > >> 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' is 328 MiB. > >> > >> With no way to get 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' into the > developers' > >> hands, I guess all my > >> efforts will go to naught. > >> ___ > >> ffmpeg-user mailing list > >> ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > >> > >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > >> ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > ___ > > ffmpeg-user mailing list > > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > > > > -- > I don't have a dog. > And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite. > And furthermore, you provoked him. > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Out of virtual memory (swap, I assume) = telecine+setpts combination
On 02/04/2021 04:50 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Well, perhaps your command queues too much frame and that is bad. Perhaps? ffmpeg -i source.mkv -map 0 -filter_complex "telecine, setpts=N*1001/3/TB" -codec:v libx265 -x265-params crf=20:qcomp=0.60 -codec:a copy -codec:s copy "with both telecine and setpts.mkv" What does "...perhaps your command queues too much frame" mean? On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:34 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 02/03/2021 12:23 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: On 2/2/2021 2:52 PM, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: If that's true, what's eating the swap? Transcoding parts 1, 2, 3, & 4 all succeeded when running concurrently. Transcoding part 5 fails, even when ffmpeg is the only app running. Out of curiosity, have you tried looking at the file with an mkv analyzer like MediaInfo, Elecard's analyzer* or maybe another one? (Is there metadata towards the end of the file containing junk info?) How does it behave if you drop the minterpolate or one of the other filters, output to a null file, or use a different output codec? (Anything to try isolating the problem.) If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory leak, then the telecine filter has a memory leak. **WRONG** OHMYGOD! The problem isn't telecine. The problem isn't setpts. The problem is telecine + setpts in combination! **CORRECTION** If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory leak, then the combination of telecine and setpts filters provokes a memory leak. My trouble packet is 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip'. I can't put it in dropbox because dropbox has now added a 100 MB limit in an attempt to force me to pay. 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' is 328 MiB. With no way to get 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' into the developers' hands, I guess all my efforts will go to naught. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". -- I don't have a dog. And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite. And furthermore, you provoked him. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Out of virtual memory (swap, I assume) = telecine+setpts combination
Well, perhaps your command queues too much frame and that is bad. On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:34 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 02/03/2021 12:23 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > > On 2/2/2021 2:52 PM, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > >> If that's true, what's eating the swap? Transcoding parts 1, 2, 3, & 4 > all succeeded when running > >> concurrently. Transcoding part 5 fails, even when ffmpeg is the only > app running. > > > > Out of curiosity, have you tried looking at the file with an mkv > analyzer like MediaInfo, Elecard's > > analyzer* or maybe another one? (Is there metadata towards the end of > the file containing junk info?) > > > > How does it behave if you drop the minterpolate or one of the other > filters, output to a null file, > > or use a different output codec? (Anything to try isolating the problem.) > > If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory > leak, then the telecine filter > has a memory leak. > > **WRONG** > > OHMYGOD! The problem isn't telecine. The problem isn't setpts. The problem > is telecine + setpts in > combination! > > **CORRECTION** > If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory > leak, then the combination of > telecine and setpts filters provokes a memory leak. > > My trouble packet is 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip'. I can't put it in > dropbox because dropbox > has now added a 100 MB limit in an attempt to force me to pay. > > 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' is 328 MiB. > > With no way to get 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' into the developers' > hands, I guess all my > efforts will go to naught. > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Out of virtual memory (swap, I assume) = telecine+setpts combination
On 02/03/2021 12:23 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: On 2/2/2021 2:52 PM, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: If that's true, what's eating the swap? Transcoding parts 1, 2, 3, & 4 all succeeded when running concurrently. Transcoding part 5 fails, even when ffmpeg is the only app running. Out of curiosity, have you tried looking at the file with an mkv analyzer like MediaInfo, Elecard's analyzer* or maybe another one? (Is there metadata towards the end of the file containing junk info?) How does it behave if you drop the minterpolate or one of the other filters, output to a null file, or use a different output codec? (Anything to try isolating the problem.) If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory leak, then the telecine filter has a memory leak. **WRONG** OHMYGOD! The problem isn't telecine. The problem isn't setpts. The problem is telecine + setpts in combination! **CORRECTION** If rising memory allocation and rising swap commit indicates a memory leak, then the combination of telecine and setpts filters provokes a memory leak. My trouble packet is 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip'. I can't put it in dropbox because dropbox has now added a 100 MB limit in an attempt to force me to pay. 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' is 328 MiB. With no way to get 'telecine+setpts memory leak.zip' into the developers' hands, I guess all my efforts will go to naught. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
