Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
> > We rebuild the source rpm from the rpmfusion RHEL 6 repo on RHEL 5 by > > disabling any features that would not build on the older RHEL > release. > > What build errors do you see if you take the sources of F21? I suspect > they should be easy to fix. I will give it a try. Greetings, Wilfried ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
Wilfried Weissmann realnetworks.com> writes: > > EPEL6: ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > > F21: ffmpeg-2.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm > We rebuild the source rpm from the rpmfusion RHEL 6 > repo on RHEL 5 by disabling any features that would > not build on the older RHEL release. What build errors do you see if you take the sources of F21? I suspect they should be easy to fix. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
> > Sorry, I was referring to the 0.10 branch. I would like to stay on > > that branch to have a chance to get upstream versions from the > > rpmfusion repository. > > Interesting. For EPEL/RHEL5 (that's what you were refering to?) I see > ffmpeg 0.4.9. > > Actually: > EPEL5: ffmpeg-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.el5.x86_64.rpm > EPEL6: ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.x86_64.rpm > F19: ffmpeg-1.2.7-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm > F20: ffmpeg-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm > F21: ffmpeg-2.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm > > It's be nice to get a newer bundle for your repo... I didn't manage to > find any other repos though. We rebuild the source rpm from the rpmfusion RHEL 6 repo on RHEL 5 by disabling any features that would not build on the older RHEL release. I would not mind having a newer release in the repos, but I needed a quick fix so I stayed on 0.10.x. I do not own the rpmfusion repository neither am I a contributor. Wilfried ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes: > EPEL5: ffmpeg-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.el5.x86_64.rpm To the best of my knowledge this has known security issues including known sample exploits. Note that it is also missing thousands of features present in current versions of FFmpeg. > EPEL6: ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.x86_64.rpm As said, this is too old and should not be used. > F19: ffmpeg-1.2.7-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm This is supported. > F20: ffmpeg-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm This is compatible with later releases and should be updated. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:04:31 +, Wilfried Weissmann wrote: > Sorry, I was referring to the 0.10 branch. I would like to stay on > that branch to have a chance to get upstream versions from the > rpmfusion repository. Interesting. For EPEL/RHEL5 (that's what you were refering to?) I see ffmpeg 0.4.9. Actually: EPEL5: ffmpeg-0.4.9-0.52.20080908.el5.x86_64.rpm EPEL6: ffmpeg-0.10.11-1.el6.x86_64.rpm F19: ffmpeg-1.2.7-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm F20: ffmpeg-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm F21: ffmpeg-2.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm It's be nice to get a newer bundle for your repo... I didn't manage to find any other repos though. Moritz ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
Wilfried Weissmann realnetworks.com> writes: > > Just to make sure there are no misunderstandings: > > 0.10 is over 2,5 years old. > > Sorry, I was referring to the 0.10 branch. Me too. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
> Wilfried Weissmann realnetworks.com> writes: > > > > "The problem is: Why are you using 0.10?" > > > > Simply because that is the version that is available in the rpmfusion > > repository. I tested if the problem is still in 0.10.14 which was > > released at the end of June > > Just to make sure there are no misunderstandings: > 0.10 is over 2,5 years old. Sorry, I was referring to the 0.10 branch. I would like to stay on that branch to have a chance to get upstream versions from the rpmfusion repository. Greetings, Wilfried ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
Wilfried Weissmann realnetworks.com> writes: > > "The problem is: Why are you using 0.10?" > > Simply because that is the version that is available in > the rpmfusion repository. I tested if the problem is > still in 0.10.14 which was released at the end of June Just to make sure there are no misunderstandings: 0.10 is over 2,5 years old. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
In reply to Carl Eugen Hoyos: "The problem is: Why are you using 0.10?" Simply because that is the version that is available in the rpmfusion repository. I tested if the problem is still in 0.10.14 which was released at the end of June, but it did not help. I try to stay away from repackaging a newer major release of the whole thing, including its dependencies, and rebuild for RHEL 5. This is already more complex for us than it should be. Greetings, Wilfried PS: Sorry about how I did the reply. I was not subscribed to the list yet. This is now fixed. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Incorrect value in RIFF WAV byterate field in ffmpeg 0.10.x
Wilfried Weissmann realnetworks.com> writes: > Can this change be back ported to 0.10? This is simple, you could setup a git clone and ask for a merge. The problem is: Why are you using 0.10? There are uncountable (more serious and more difficult to track!) known issues that are not reproducible with a current version of FFmpeg, certainly including security-relevant issues... Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user