[filmscanners] RE: Which SCSI Card for SS4000
Doesn't the SS4000 come bundled with a SCSI card? I thought it did (but could be mistaken) as I have one here still in the package that I've never used as I had SCSI built in to my Mac. Unless it came with my CDRW, I'm pretty sure it came with my scanner (man, aging is hell). It is an Advansys SCSI adapter, PCI, with a 50-pin internal port as well as a DB-25 external port. I'd gladly sell it for $25 if anyone needs one, as I'm obviously not using it. Mike Plano, TX USA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bernie Kubiak Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Which SCSI Card for SS4000 Polaroid suggests the use of Adaptec products and will offer technical support. I have the Adaptec AIC 7850 and Win XP has no problems with it. The scanner needs a 50 pin Centronics M or DB-25M connector. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Which SCSI Card for SS4000 Someone who is not yet subscribed here is buying a SS4000 scanner and wanted to know which is the best SCSI card to use with the scanner on a PC, with, I assume, PCI interfacing. Also, he was wondering which type of SCSI cable he needs (he wanted to pre-purchase the cable, as it isn't coming with the purchase). What SCSI II cable plug does the scanner use, and what is required on the Card end? I haven't used an SS4000, only the SS4000+ which uses USB and Firewire, and I can't recall what the SS4000 "rear" looks like. Thanks, Art Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.
> 1) Bits. I need some clarification on what the siginificance of all > the different bit-rates are about for color. > > 2) Sizing. Now this is just specifying the pixel dimension of the > image, correct? Without changing the resolution. > Starting to read the www.scantips pages. Haven't run into a > discussion of the bit question there yet, but if it's there I will! Ken: I highly recommend buying Wayne's book at the Scantips website. I bought it right after buying my scanner (P S4000) and the 'bits' and 'sizing' questions are very well covered and simply explained. I, too, was quite confused, and the book really helped. Mike
RE: filmscanners: SS4000 comments
They are one in the same. Both versions of the software are included on the disk(s). Just received mine yesterday, and the bundle has it all (even includes three different power cords - US, UK, and generic European plugs!). Wire mentioned that the film/slide holders are flimsy - the slide holder seems OK, but the film holder is awkward and flimsy enough that I ordered a spare. Mike > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Hill > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 comments > > > Thanks for the info Wire. > > I have a question about the different platforms for this > scanner. I ran > across a site with prices very close to the ecost price, but > the description > read for MACs - no mention of PCs. Are there two different > versions of this > scanner or is the only difference in the installed software? > (David??) I > just unloaded my S20 and will be ordering the SS4000, I just > want to be sure > I get the right package. I am on PC system. > > Thanks in advance. > > James Hill > Freelance Photographer > Mebane, NC > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
RE: filmscanners: Silverfast or Polarscan
I've downloaded the Macintosh version of Vuescan, and tried to use it, and I'm getting a memory error. It says that it needs 91mb of memory to run? I have 160mb (just ordered 128mb more - will have that in a few days). Am I doing something wrong? I wouldn't think that it would need this much memory just to load the software. Thanks for all the help! Mike > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Barbara & Martin > Greene > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 1:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast or Polarscan > > > Mike > > No doubt that the documentation is for hunger. After > recently returning a > Nikon Super coolscan 4000 and buying a SS 4000 with the goal of saving > $1200, I have a basis to compare the two and some advice on > how to proceed. > The Nikon software is a pleasure to use, and the documentation, while > sparse, is clear and to the point. As for the SS 4000, go > with Vuescan. > Using both Polarscan and Silverfast, I got terrible results. > Using the > latest version of Vuescan with some help from those on the > forum who are > proficient with it, I've gotten great scans with excellent > color and detail. > I do wish that the documentation for it was clearer and gave more > information on how to set the various controls. > > Martin >
Re: filmscanners: Silverfast or Polarscan
I just received my new SS 4000, and am wondering the same thing. Silverfast seems to be pretty powerful, but cumbersome. How does it compare to Vuescan in quality (not just functionality)? I'm looking for the best quality scans, with minimal fuss. The Polaroid software is much easier to use than Silverfast, but doesn't offer nearly the amount of functions. The scanner is great so far - I just need to figure out how to use it properly - the documentation is seriously deficient! Mike
filmscanners: Sprintscan 4000
Just FYI - I checked BH Photo's website today, and for the second time in about a month or two the price on the Polaroid Sprintscan 4000 has dropped. It is now down to $899.95. I may have to jump in to the water soon, as this is getting to be a great deal. Mike [no connection to the seller, etc., etc.]
RE: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice.
I think that it was 7.50 pounds, not US $. This would equate to ~$13-14 US. Still not bad... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice. I would hope that Lynn was writing tongue-in-cheek or that he has based comments on out-dated information. Most of the places that I know in my local area are charging $15 for a high resolution flatbed or non-drum film scan. Of course, if one considers the current cost of living as being pricey, then $7.50 US for a drum-scan would be pricey. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Alexander Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FW: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice. Please forgive the group newbie, but is that $7.50 us for a drum scan and is it considered pricey??? HOLY *#!%!!! I pay $28-$40/scan!!! Am I being taken for a ride? Please if anyone can suggest a less expensive vendor please do so! William Alexander Art Director Leisure Publishing Company 540-989-6138 -- > From: Lynn Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice. > > 7.50 per drum-scan is a bit pricey,
