Hi guys. I just had a conversation with some experienced user of IV ED. During the talk, he mentioned that once he acquired the scanner and started to built his archive, he turned to negatives solely claiming that he found the results to be better scanning negatives in case of wide dynamic range captured on the film. He states that the image with featuring high contrast (night scenic for example) will be rendered much better by the scanner in terms of the details in dark, while highlights are still well preserved, whilst with slides often the dark details are missing being still resolved visually on light table under loupe. Is that correct ? I usually prefer to shoot slides for anything except people-related stuff, but if is opinions have much to reflect the reality, I would probably switch to negatives for outdoors also.
Regards, Alex Z ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
