filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
Ken wrote: >That IS a sharp lens, BTW. Old chromenose Canon FD 100/2.8. Scanned >on a FS 2710, with a touch of USM. 140%, 1.2 pixels, IIRC. Looks like I'm going to Japan next year, which should give me the chance to pick up a really good lens or two at a decent price. It's frustrating knowing how much better my photos could be! Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:14:38 -0800, you wrote: >>Couldn't find it in your galleries - is it there? > >Aak! Forgot to include the url in my earlier post (it's not indexed from the flowers >page). Sorry about that. Here it is: > > www.shomler.com/other/018215.jpg > >Bob Shomler >www.shomler.com Aha - yes. Beautiful. And yes it's more magenta. We have some of that strain here, too. Closer to this shot, which is sort of a cousin to yours: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=405011 I suppose all of this is not SO far off-topic, being a way to compare notes on color rendition. Of course, with Day Lilies, that's like comparing the colors of people's eyes but they do sort themselves into distinct strains, with characteristic colors. Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
>Couldn't find it in your galleries - is it there? Aak! Forgot to include the url in my earlier post (it's not indexed from the flowers page). Sorry about that. Here it is: www.shomler.com/other/018215.jpg Bob Shomler www.shomler.com - >>By chance I took a photo of a day lily this summer for my wife to use. Colors in >that one are less saturated, and primary flower color is more to magenta than red. >There can be different varieties, and probably differences due to time of day, light, >and location. NPH film, scanned on LS-30 using vuescan then levels tuned in >photoshop. > > >Couldn't find it in your galleries - is it there? > > >Ken Durling
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:40:46 +1000, you wrote: >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=455020&size=lg > >Wow! It's amazingly sharp! But did you intend to leave in the dust and >scratches? :-7 > >Rob > Heh. Missed a couple, didn't I? Ahem. :-/ That IS a sharp lens, BTW. Old chromenose Canon FD 100/2.8. Scanned on a FS 2710, with a touch of USM. 140%, 1.2 pixels, IIRC. Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:00:01 -0800, you wrote: >By chance I took a photo of a day lily this summer for my wife to use. Colors in >that one are less saturated, and primary flower color is more to magenta than red. >There can be different varieties, and probably differences due to time of day, light, >and location. NPH film, scanned on LS-30 using vuescan then levels tuned in >photoshop. Couldn't find it in your galleries - is it there? Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=455020&size=lg Wow! It's amazingly sharp! But did you intend to leave in the dust and scratches? :-7 Rob
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
By chance I took a photo of a day lily this summer for my wife to use. Colors in that one are less saturated, and primary flower color is more to magenta than red. There can be different varieties, and probably differences due to time of day, light, and location. NPH film, scanned on LS-30 using vuescan then levels tuned in photoshop. -- Bob Shomler www.shomler.com/gallery.htm >Thanks for all the great help. This is what I finally came up with. >Wondering if you think the colors look natural. These _are_ pretty >creatures. > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=455020&size=lg > >Ken Durling
Re: filmscanners: S400 final result
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:55:47 -0500, you wrote: >I have about 30 or so different varieties planted on my side hill. I think I >have that variety. Hey, if you can identify the variety from the shot, that's probably good enough color for me! ;-) Ken
RE: filmscanners: S400 final result
I have about 30 or so different varieties planted on my side hill. I think I have that variety. David -Original Message- From: Ken Durling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:filmscanners: S400 final result Thanks for all the great help. This is what I finally came up with. Wondering if you think the colors look natural. These _are_ pretty creatures. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=455020&size=lg Ken Durling Photo.net portfolio: http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=402251
