RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Frank Nichols

I use a Scanwit 2720 and Vuescan with Multipass scanning and the alignment
appears to be perfect.

/fn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herm
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 6:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


You can still do multiscanning with Vuescan, but I prefer to digitally align
the
images using a second program called Picture Window. Registration is not
perfect
in subsequent Scanwit scans, so multiscaning will slightly blurr the image.
Here
is the link for Picture Window:

http://www.dl-c.com/aboutpw.html

The program can also be used to seamless stitch images together to form a
panorama.

mahimahi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

My cheap Acer 2720s produces realistic colors without much adjustment, but
I
miss the multiple scanning features found in Silverfast AI. If Lasersoft
has
decided to give up on the LS1000, I hope that a version may soon be
available for the Acer.


Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez




Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Herm

appears is the key word, I do astrophotography and even the slightest miss
alignment will show double stars in the final product. It really depends on how
picky you are.

Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

I use a Scanwit 2720 and Vuescan with Multipass scanning and the alignment
appears to be perfect.

/fn

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez



RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Frank Nichols

I am very picky - I checked several times at 1200% magnification and I saw
no vertical or horizontal offsets visible at the pixel level. The reason I
said appears is that I assume there is some slack or play in the transport
mechanism and perfect can not be achivied.

The reason I was skeptical was I tried using multipass scanning on a flatbed
(HP5370) and saw the offset effect. Since the offset was repeatable I
suggested to ED H (Vuescan) that he include an option to allow the user to
input an offset value for subsequent passes.

/fn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herm
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


appears is the key word, I do astrophotography and even the slightest miss
alignment will show double stars in the final product. It really depends on
how
picky you are.

Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

I use a Scanwit 2720 and Vuescan with Multipass scanning and the alignment
appears to be perfect.

/fn

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez




Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Herm

Yes thats the reason.. other scanners multiscan before the frame advances, thus
they get perfect registration.. The acer must scan the whole image and then
average it with another scan.. all things considered the Acer does a good job..
you would be amazed if you tried multiscanning with an old HP S20.. horrible
registration.

Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

The reason I
said appears is that I assume there is some slack or play in the transport
mechanism and perfect can not be achivied.

Herm
Astropics http://home.att.net/~hermperez



Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Alan Tyson

When I've tried multiscanning on my 2720S, I've found it
hard to detect any degradation. Misalignment is of the order
of one 2700 ppi pixel on mine, or less, so it wouldn't
bother most
people. I can see it might mess up star locations.

Regards,
Alan T

- Original Message -
From: Herm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


 appears is the key word, I do astrophotography and even
the slightest miss
 alignment will show double stars in the final product. It
really depends on how
 picky you are.






Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-09 Thread Alan Tyson

Frank,

I bet you're right, and this explains the wide divergence of
view here on Scanwit multiscanning accuracy which we've
discussed at least twice over the last year or so.

If using Herm's subtraction method to identify
discrepancies, the experiment to do is to compare several
different single pass images with a single multipass
composite. The smallest differences found would be the
nearest to the errors introduced by multiscanning, but this
still might exaggerate them, unless one of the single-pass
images happened to start in the same place on the frame as
the multipass one.

Does this make sense?

Alan T

- Original Message -
From: Frank Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


 Actually scanning the same image twice is not exactly the
same as multipass
 scanning in Vuescan - I wish Ed were here to answer this,
but I recall a
 post he made where he described using the course
positioning stepper to
 position to the frame and the a fine stepper to
scan/multi-scan.

 So, If you actually scan twice the course stepper must be
used to position
 twice which is not as accurate.

 (maybe?)

 /fn

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Herm
 Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:49 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


 the way to test is to scan the same image twice, then
subtract them from
 each
 other in photoshop.. if you get all black then its ok,
usually you will see
 a
 few defects. I will include an example so you can see it.
I inverted the
 image
 so you could see the differences.






RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-04 Thread mahimahi

In the documentation which is included on the Silverfast AI CD, A floating
window should appear upon selecting negative as a film choice. from there
about 6 general brand film types (Agfa/Kodak 1,2,3/Fuji 1,2,) and 3
general choices Monochrome/standard/linear can be selected. Yet another
control is shown for exposure.

These being post scan color corrections, I do not see why they would be
omitted from the Nikon version.

-
There are no film profiles in Silverfast AI
Where have you got that info?
Mikael Risedal






RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-04 Thread Mikael Risedal

Hello Mahimahi
I read the pdf and there are as you describe a floating window, page 119 in 
the manual.
I have already contacted my friends at Silverfast and ask them about
why this features are not included in 5,2 as described.
The answer will come soon
Best regards
Mikael Risedal






From: mahimahi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:02:29 +0900

In the documentation which is included on the Silverfast AI CD, A floating
window should appear upon selecting negative as a film choice. from there
about 6 general brand film types (Agfa/Kodak 1,2,3/Fuji 1,2,) and 3
general choices Monochrome/standard/linear can be selected. Yet another
control is shown for exposure.

These being post scan color corrections, I do not see why they would be
omitted from the Nikon version.

-
There are no film profiles in Silverfast AI
Where have you got that info?
Mikael Risedal




_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-04 Thread Mikael Risedal

Ian
Thanks for the answer. I have not seen any film profiles during the years I 
have used Silverscan but the pdf file in 5.2 can confuse people.

Best regards Mikael Risedal


From: Ian Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 18:48:46 +0100



  When selecting negative mode in silverfast, I do not get the Film type 
and
  Exposure window as described in Ian Lyons Tutorial. Am I missing 
something?
 

My tutorial makes it quite clear that Nikon scanners do NOT use the 
negative
scanning feature as shown in the tutorial. Paragraph 2 :-

SilverFast AI 5 for the Polaroid SS4000/120 has a special routine built-in
for dealing with the coloured mask found on virtually all negative films.
This routine is common to all the other scanner models supported by
LaserSoft, except those by Nikon. Although, many of the messages I receive
regarding SilverFast and negative scanning relate to the fact that
SilverFast does not include film specific profiles,  I will demonstrate
these profiles are not really necessary.

  Silverfast maybe have a written software to Polaroid SS 4000 scanner who
  are including film profiles.


Not sure that I understand what this means, but SilverFast does NOT use 
film
profiles!


  In the documentation which is included on the Silverfast AI CD, A 
floating
  window should appear upon selecting negative as a film choice. from 
there
  about 6 general brand film types (Agfa/Kodak 1,2,3/Fuji 1,2,) and 3
  general choices Monochrome/standard/linear can be selected. Yet another
  control is shown for exposure.
 

The software for Nikon scanners doesn't support the feature. You don't need
the feature, you can ignore this section of the manual, which is written to
cover ALL supported scanners. For the LS30/2000 IV/4000 and 8000 there is a
Nikon specific addendum on the CD

  These being post scan color corrections, I do not see why they would be
  omitted from the Nikon version.

Because when LaserSoft tried to make the feature work they failed,
miserably.


  I have already contacted my friends at Silverfast and ask them about
  why this features are not included in 5,2 as described.
  The answer will come soon


Big :-)


Ian Lyons
http://www.computer-darkroom.com



_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




RE: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-04 Thread mahimahi



The software for Nikon scanners doesn't support the feature. You don't need
the feature, you can ignore this section of the manual, which is written to
cover ALL supported scanners. For the LS30/2000 IV/4000 and 8000 there is a
Nikon specific addendum on the CD


Ian, your tutorials are excellent!!  I did read that the features were not
supported by Nikon, But I thought that there would be at least some of the
selections available in Negative mode.

As for the LS1000, no addendum is included on the CD, nor is the LS1000
included in the list of scanner profile choices in the CMS window.

The images(underwater) I scan require some serious tweaking. The deep blue
color of the Tropical Pacific ends up bright green.

My cheap Acer 2720s produces realistic colors without much adjustment, but I
miss the multiple scanning features found in Silverfast AI. If Lasersoft has
decided to give up on the LS1000, I hope that a version may soon be
available for the Acer.

Will try Vuescan this weekend. Hope to get some decent results.

 These being post scan color corrections, I do not see why they would be
 omitted from the Nikon version.

Because when LaserSoft tried to make the feature work they failed,
miserably.


 I have already contacted my friends at Silverfast and ask them about
 why this features are not included in 5,2 as described.
 The answer will come soon

I have sent a inquiry to Lasersoft as well. Hope to find a solution to the
problem.

Chris Bangs





Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-03 Thread Mikael Risedal

Answer 2 regarding film profiles and Silverfast AI

Silverfast maybe have a  written software to Polaroid SS 4000 scanner who 
are including film profiles.
To Nikon scanner there are no film profiles at all.
Ians example are scanned by ss 4000.
Mikael Risedal




From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:11:50 -0500

Are you by chance using Silverfast SE?  It does not include film profiles
like Silverfast AI does.

Maris

- Original Message -
From: mahimahi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


| When selecting negative mode in silverfast, I do not get the Film type 
and
| Exposure window as described in Ian Lyons Tutorial. Am I missing
something?
|
|
|


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000

2001-07-03 Thread Mikael Risedal

There are no film profiles in Silverfast AI
Where have you got that info?
Mikael Risedal



From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:11:50 -0500

Are you by chance using Silverfast SE?  It does not include film profiles
like Silverfast AI does.

Maris

- Original Message -
From: mahimahi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:21 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Silverfast and LS1000


| When selecting negative mode in silverfast, I do not get the Film type 
and
| Exposure window as described in Ian Lyons Tutorial. Am I missing
something?
|
|
|


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.