RE: filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan...

[Lawrence Smith]

Doh!  I hate when I do that.  Thanks Rafe!

Lawrence
> 
> 
> So what's to critique?  It's beautiful.
> 
> OK, here's my critique:
> 
> You forgot the "//" after "http:" in the url you gave above.
> 
> 
> rafe b.
> 
> 

Re: filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan...

[rafeb]

At 11:43 PM 6/25/01 -0400, Lawrence Smith wrote:
>All,
>
>I regularly post images to a critique page on my site.  The current image is
>one that I did using the new 8000.  This particular scan does not have
>visible banding (well that you can see on the screen anyway).  If anyone
>wants to take a look it's at http:www.lwsphoto.com  Click on the Critique
>button.  I was very happy with the scan.  Really held the luminance of the
>645 transparency very well...  As for the photo, you can make up your own
>mind about it's merits ;-)


So what's to critique?  It's beautiful.

OK, here's my critique:

You forgot the "//" after "http:" in the url you gave above.


rafe b.

filmscanners: A GOOD nikon 8000 scan...

[Lawrence Smith]

All,

I regularly post images to a critique page on my site.  The current image is
one that I did using the new 8000.  This particular scan does not have
visible banding (well that you can see on the screen anyway).  If anyone
wants to take a look it's at http:www.lwsphoto.com  Click on the Critique
button.  I was very happy with the scan.  Really held the luminance of the
645 transparency very well...  As for the photo, you can make up your own
mind about it's merits ;-)

Lawrence