filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: HP 7400c

2001-11-12 Thread Rob Geraghty

Ezio wrote:
> The HP6200 is broken (I actually scanned 100 times max !!)
> (150$ asked for a repair by the HP carry - in centre !!) 
> I have substituted the flatbed with an inexpensive Genius Kye 50$
> worth ... and it produces good results for my purposes.
> Ready to listen to people knowing better than me the 7400 , but I
> won't buy this brand any more .. :-(((

I've had an HP Scanjet IIIc since 1995 and it is still going strong.  I've
scanned a LOT of stuff with it.  However, I understand that much more recent
models may not have the same quality.  Personally if I was going to buy
another flatbed right now I'd get a Canon - for reflective scanning they're
cheap and work very well.  For things that don't fit on the flatbed you
can use stitching software to reassemble multiple scans.  But large transparencies
are a problem.  "Better" options might be to look at Epson or Umax for small
transparencies.  I don't know if there's anything "cheap" that will scan
a large transparency well.

Rob


Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com






Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: HP 7400c

2001-11-12 Thread John Rylatt

I have a Visioner 8820USB which will scan  up to 5x7 inch transparencies @ up to 
1200x1200
dpi. Costs about $130 US. It is rated 'well' in PCWorld.

It is not supported by VueScan as yet.

Regards, John.


Rob Geraghty wrote:
> 
> Ezio wrote:
> > The HP6200 is broken (I actually scanned 100 times max !!)
> > (150$ asked for a repair by the HP carry - in centre !!)
> > I have substituted the flatbed with an inexpensive Genius Kye 50$
> > worth ... and it produces good results for my purposes.
> > Ready to listen to people knowing better than me the 7400 , but I
> > won't buy this brand any more .. :-(((
> 
> I've had an HP Scanjet IIIc since 1995 and it is still going strong.  I've
> scanned a LOT of stuff with it.  However, I understand that much more recent
> models may not have the same quality.  Personally if I was going to buy
> another flatbed right now I'd get a Canon - for reflective scanning they're
> cheap and work very well.  For things that don't fit on the flatbed you
> can use stitching software to reassemble multiple scans.  But large transparencies
> are a problem.  "Better" options might be to look at Epson or Umax for small
> transparencies.  I don't know if there's anything "cheap" that will scan
> a large transparency well.
> 
> Rob
> 
> Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://wordweb.com