[Finale] Ties unequal pitches together?

2010-09-29 Thread billsincl

 Well first of all, if the two pitches are not the same, it's a SLUR, not a tie.

But I've noticed that when you change the pitch of a note 
that IS tied, it breaks the tie - and then does not put the correct accidental 
on the
other note.

When it plays the music back it gives you two pitches, but does NOT show the 
correct pitches
on the staff. In other words, the played pitches are not consistent with what 
is on the staff.

When you change the pitch of a tied note, it should change the pitches of ALL
notes tied to it, automatically.

I'm kind of surprised that their programmers won't FIX something that's so 
obvious.

But maybe it's because they never took any music courses?

 


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Ties unequal pitches together?

2010-09-29 Thread SN jef chippewa


Well first of all, if the two pitches are not the same, it's a SLUR, 
not a tie.


it would be a tie if the pitch change was to account for a key change 
and the sounding note was the "same" but notated differently for the 
context.


When you change the pitch of a tied note, it should change the 
pitches of ALL notes tied to it, automatically.


I'm kind of surprised that their programmers won't FIX something 
that's so obvious.

But maybe it's because they never took any music courses?


maybe it's because it ain't broken.

you can use the selection tool to change the pitch of a range of 
notes (tied or not) in several ways.  plugin change pitch to x, use 
numpad 6/7/8/9 to transpose diatonically second / octave or use the 
transposition context menu item for many more options.


your proposal is an interesting one, i just don't think the tool is 
broken like you suggest.  you would rather see it function 
differently.  fair enough... but it ain't broked, dude.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re(2): [Finale] bartók pizz. : line up vs. down

2010-09-29 Thread Leigh Daniels
Gardner Read, Music Notation, p. 272:

"Another symbol is x invented by Stockhausen, inveterate fabricator of
notational devices. This sign is a slight modification of (circle-line
up) or (circle-line down) created by Béla Bartók for the "snap"
pizzicato in string instruments . . . "

**Leigh

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010, SN jef chippewa  wrote:

>thanks, actually it is, it indicates there was no 
>special symbol for it back then.  since bartók 
>seems to have been the first to have used the 
>technique widely and the thing is named after him 
>it would seem logical to use the symbol he used 
>for it.  i have yet to find out who in fact 
>invented the symbol and if there were other 
>versions / symbols used before the ring with 
>upwards tail.



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] names in the parts

2010-09-29 Thread Lawrence David Eden

Greetings,

In earlier versions of Finale it was easy to tell Finale to print the 
part name on each extracted partI have not been as successful 
with my latest version of Finale (2K7 Mac).  I can get what I need, 
but I have to do each part manually.  Surely there is a better way.


What am I missing?  When I go to edit my parts, I see the part 
namesincluding an abbreviated name at the beginning of every 
line.  All I want is the following:


Part name printed in fullon every page of each part.

Suggestions?

Larry
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] names in the parts

2010-09-29 Thread Eric Dannewitz
It's in the manual

Text tool->inserts->part/score name

Sent from my iSomething

On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Lawrence David Eden  wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> In earlier versions of Finale it was easy to tell Finale to print the part 
> name on each extracted partI have not been as successful with my latest 
> version of Finale (2K7 Mac).  I can get what I need, but I have to do each 
> part manually.  Surely there is a better way.
>
> What am I missing?  When I go to edit my parts, I see the part 
> namesincluding an abbreviated name at the beginning of every line.  All I 
> want is the following:
>
> Part name printed in fullon every page of each part.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Larry
> ___
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale