Re: [Finale] Quotes and Digests

2005-08-11 Thread Aaron Sherber

At 01:31 PM 08/11/2005, Henry E. Howey wrote:
I haven't done a total lately; however, I believe the DIGEST option is a
70/30 prefernce of listmembers.

421 Digest / 362 non-digest

Aaron.

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Quotes and Digests

2005-08-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 11 Aug 2005 at 13:41, Aaron Sherber wrote:

 At 01:31 PM 08/11/2005, Henry E. Howey wrote:
  I haven't done a total lately; however, I believe the DIGEST option
  is a 70/30 prefernce of listmembers.
 
 421 Digest / 362 non-digest

*BOGGLE*

That means that a *majority* of subscribers are on Digest.

That means that more of the people you are writing to are reading 
your posts in Digest (assuming they are actually reading) than 
individual messages.

That indicates to me that, assuming we all want the list's 
subscribers to read our posts, we should all format our posts for 
maximum readability on the Digest -- we should all be considering 
Digest readers when we post to the list.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Quotes and Digests

2005-08-11 Thread Johannes Gebauer



David W. Fenton schrieb:

That indicates to me that, assuming we all want the list's 
subscribers to read our posts, we should all format our posts for 
maximum readability on the Digest -- we should all be considering 
Digest readers when we post to the list.


Which, of course, noone ever doubted. Only you doubted that noone 
doubted, so there you go.


Johannes


--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Quotes and Digests

2005-08-11 Thread David W. Fenton
On 12 Aug 2005 at 0:56, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

 David W. Fenton schrieb:
 
  That indicates to me that, assuming we all want the list's 
  subscribers to read our posts, we should all format our posts for
  maximum readability on the Digest -- we should all be considering
  Digest readers when we post to the list.
  
 Which, of course, noone ever doubted. Only you doubted that noone
 doubted, so there you go.

Well, the lack of effort on the part of many posters in regard to 
trimming quotations indicates to me that there was little concern 
over the issue.

Darcy's questioning of the utility of the Digest confused me into 
thinking that this was also a challenge to the basic request, that 
people take the time to post sensibly.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Quotes and Digests

2005-08-11 Thread dhbailey

David W. Fenton wrote:

[snip]

Well, the lack of effort on the part of many posters in regard to 
trimming quotations indicates to me that there was little concern 
over the issue.


Darcy's questioning of the utility of the Digest confused me into 
thinking that this was also a challenge to the basic request, that 
people take the time to post sensibly.




I think the issue of people not trimming messages properly is simply one 
of learning netiquette -- just as with table manners, people new to 
something often need to be reminded about proper behavior, and people 
who are old-timers at it often need to be reminded to because neat 
habits can turn into sloppy habits.



--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale