[Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
In order for the build of ethereal-ssl to find GTK+2, I had to manually install: pango1-xft2-dev atk1 I suspect gtk+2-dev should depend on these. Otherwise: pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0 fails, complaining about those two packages missing. Which makes ethereal's configure script decide gtk+2.0 isn't there. I imagine this affects gtk+2.0-dev users in general, not just ethereal-ssl. BTW: The symptom of this failure is that in the end you'll wind up with only tethereal. The build is still going, I'll report back if there turn out to be any additional problems. Googling for the problem, it appears that no one really solved it, though back in April someone thought their gtk+2.0 was broken; I suspect rebuilding gtk+2.0 just managed to install those missing packages. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] abs-0.908-12
the home page information is not valid anymore, unable to access. installation current but no idea how to run the program! --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Anthony DeRobertis wrote: In order for the build of ethereal-ssl to find GTK+2, I had to manually install: pango1-xft2-dev atk1 I suspect gtk+2-dev should depend on these. Otherwise: gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything. It has, however, in its description the lines: Any package which BuildDepends on this one must also BuildDepend on: atk1 (= 1.6.0-1), glib2-dev (= 2.4.0-1), pango1-xft2-dev (= 1.4.0-1) Visibly, ethereal-ssl doesn't follow this requirement. I fixed it in CVS now. -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Martin Costabel wrote: gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything. A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does depend on things: Depends: gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.4.9-8), gtk+2 (= 2.4.9-8), darwin (= 8-1) It has, however, in its description the lines: Any package which BuildDepends on this one must also BuildDepend on: atk1 (= 1.6.0-1), glib2-dev (= 2.4.0-1), pango1-xft2-dev (= 1.4.0-1) I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but that really sounds rather backwards... --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony DeRobertis wrote: | Martin Costabel wrote: | |gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything. | | | A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev | packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does | depend on things: | | Depends: gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.4.9-8), gtk+2 (= 2.4.9-8), darwin (= 8-1) | | |It has, however, in its |description the lines: | | Any package which BuildDepends on this one must also BuildDepend on: | atk1 (= 1.6.0-1), glib2-dev (= 2.4.0-1), pango1-xft2-dev (= 1.4.0-1) | | | I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but that really sounds rather | backwards... Yes there is a good reason. Think for a second and you'll realize what it is Packages which are Build Depends Only can not depend on other, unrelated, packages. It is erfectly fine for them to depend on their own shared libraries etc, it is required, in fact. But if it were to depend on, for example glib2, then it would be impossible for another package to BuildDepend on glib without a BuildConflicts on gtk+2-dev etc, Depends and BuildDepends are totally different things. Please put some thought into things before postingand accusing others of stupidity. Thanks, Peter - -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBQnzf/LiDAg3OZTLPAQJlkAQAoZEaMiuex9R5sRBOdIMFqOvM3CB4Woiz k88IxQtY80zYd+RZ0tCZkXsI4q0ThZlvMaR23DoHUUTvvQUgM76NMuwygG7P5aQ4 S53sgZc/9LmVEsarTPfDVDvWhVL7UWmRaEc6UcpSC2IauRMsrwMQx+1Zj/8nXiQA YGU+FkIv1VY= =1EVd -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: gtk+2-dev must not depend on anything. A quick check didn't show anything in fink packaging policy about -dev packages not being able to depend on anything, and indeed gtk+2-dev does depend on things: Depends: gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.4.9-8), gtk+2 (= 2.4.9-8), darwin (= 8-1) Well, I exaggerated a little; it is not allowed to depend on things that have the BuildDependsOnly flag set, that is basically other *-dev packages. It has, however, in its description the lines: Any package which BuildDepends on this one must also BuildDepend on: atk1 (= 1.6.0-1), glib2-dev (= 2.4.0-1), pango1-xft2-dev (= 1.4.0-1) I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but that really sounds rather backwards... I agree, and this has been discussed from time to time, but so far none of the proposed solutions has made it into reality. -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Peter O'Gorman wrote: | I'm sure there is a good reason for this, but that really sounds rather | backwards... Yes there is a good reason. Think for a second and you'll realize what it is Packages which are Build Depends Only can not depend on other, unrelated, packages. It is erfectly fine for them to depend on their own shared libraries etc, it is required, in fact. But if it were to depend on, for example glib2, then it would be impossible for another package to BuildDepend on glib without a BuildConflicts on gtk+2-dev etc, Why?! BuildDepends pkgA glib /|\ Depends| gtk+2-dev --/ The isn't anything inconsistent there. There is the BuildDependsOnly stuff in the Policy Manual (not quite clear on the reason for that; from reading Policy, it sounds like a technical limitation in the package manager). And yes, since glib2 is no doubt BuildDependsOnly: true, gtk+2-dev can't declare a Depends on it by policy. Depends and BuildDepends are totally different things. Really? Policy says otherwise. Policy says the only difference between Depends and Build-Depends is that Build-Depends does not apply after the build has finished. From that, it seems, at least at first glance (and from experience with how Debian handles it) --- absent BuildDependsOnly --- that you'd have gtk+2 Depends: on the extra header packages, and it'd all work. Please put some thought into things before postingand accusing others of stupidity. I have not accused anyone of stupidity. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Anthony DeRobertis wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: [] It is erfectly fine for them to depend on their own shared libraries etc, it is required, in fact. But if it were to depend on, for example glib2, then it would be impossible for another package to BuildDepend on glib without a BuildConflicts on gtk+2-dev etc, Why?! glib and glib2 are not good examples; they are compatible. But there are many *-dev packages that conflict with and replace other *-dev packages and are to be freely swapped in and out during package building. If any other package had a Depends on one of them, it could not be swapped out. This is a hard technical reason for forbidding Depends on some *-dev packages which have therefore the BuildDependsOnly flag set. Policy comes into play when it is required that *all* packages containing header files should fall into this category. There are good reasons for this policy, but it is not complete; besides the BuildDependsOnly and BuildConflicts fields, it would need some replacement for the forbidden Depends, such as the InheritedBuildDepends that has been suggested but not yet implemented. -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Fink SDL error on 10.4
Benjamin Reed wrote: Max Horn wrote: ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol ___eprintf /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a(_eprintf.o) private external definition of ___eprintf in section (__TEXT,__text) /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libstdc++.dylib(single module) definition of ___eprintf ld: Undefined symbols: __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE10deallocateEPvm __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE12_S_force_newE __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE12_S_free_listE __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE22_S_node_allocator_lockE __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE8allocateEm __ZNSt24__default_alloc_templateILb1ELi0EE9_S_refillEm /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed make[2]: *** [libSDL.la] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 ### execution of make failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling sdl-1.2.7-1 failed Looks like you need SetCC: gcc-3.3 Another problem with mixing and matching g++-3.3 and gcc-4.0 (If I had to guess.) The problem here being that sdl is cheating and not using c++ for linking but gcc -lstdc++. -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
On May 7, 2005, at 12:39, Martin Costabel wrote: glib and glib2 are not good examples; they are compatible. But there are many *-dev packages that conflict with and replace other *-dev packages and are to be freely swapped in and out during package building. If any other package had a Depends on one of them, it could not be swapped out. OK, that makes sense. Well, they could be swapped out (by removing the depending packages), but I'm guessing that's not implemented. There are good reasons for this policy, but it is not complete; besides the BuildDependsOnly and BuildConflicts fields, it would need some replacement for the forbidden Depends, such as the InheritedBuildDepends that has been suggested but not yet implemented. I'm rather curios why you'd want a IneheritedBuildDepends instead of just fixing the Depends handling --- because, currently, the installed gtk+2-dev is very much broken[0], and IneheritedBuildDepends (guessing from the name) won't fix that. Is there a good pointer into the list archives? [0] It, e.g., has #includes to pango, which will fail when only Essential and Depends are installed. Not to mention pkg-config is very upset about it. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Missing dependencies (ethereal-ssl or gtk+2)
Anthony DeRobertis wrote: [] I'm rather curios why you'd want a IneheritedBuildDepends instead of just fixing the Depends handling --- because, currently, the installed gtk+2-dev is very much broken[0], and IneheritedBuildDepends (guessing from the name) won't fix that. There is nothing broken if the advice in the description Any package which BuildDepends on this one must also BuildDepend on: atk1 (= 1.6.0-1), glib2-dev (= 2.4.0-1), pango1-xft2-dev (= 1.4.0-1) is followed. The only problem is that this has do be done manually and is not done automatically. InheritedBuildDepends would be a method to do it automatically. Is there a good pointer into the list archives? I don't know, I have them all on my hard disk :-) -- Martin --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] oaf-0.6.10-24 does not configure on Mac OS 10.4
Hi, despite having (as the FAQ suggests) reinstalled the latest Developer Tools from Xcode2 (including the 10.4 SDK) I get this error trying to configure `oaf' checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 77 I am not so much interested in oaf as I am in things that depend on it -- I might be able to help figure out the problem if I knew how to get a Debian package into a state where one can run GNU configure manually. My fink versions are: Package manager version: 0.24.5 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync my Operating System is Mac OS 10.4 Darwin goedel.local 8.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.0.0: Sat Mar 26 14:15:22 PST 2005; root:xnu-792.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc attached is a trace of fink's outputs: error.log Description: Binary data Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help get this package working. best, -john
Re: [Fink-devel] oaf-0.6.10-24 does not configure on Mac OS 10.4
On May 7, 2005, at 4:16 PM, John T. Hale wrote: Hi, despite having (as the FAQ suggests) reinstalled the latest Developer Tools from Xcode2 (including the 10.4 SDK) I get this error trying to configure `oaf' checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables ### execution of ./configure failed, exit code 77 I am not so much interested in oaf as I am in things that depend on it -- I might be able to help figure out the problem if I knew how to get a Debian package into a state where one can run GNU configure manually. My fink versions are: Package manager version: 0.24.5 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync my Operating System is Mac OS 10.4 Darwin goedel.local 8.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.0.0: Sat Mar 26 14:15:22 PST 2005; root:xnu-792.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc attached is a trace of fink's outputs:error.log Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help get this package working. best, -john Check the config.log file (e.g. /sw/src/oaf-0.6.10-24/oaf-0.6.10/config.log) and see what it says. I'd be willing to bet that you're missing some essential header files. -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] oops
Sorry about the SPAM--bit of a malfunction on my part --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] darcs - can I adopt it?
I noticed today that darcs has no maintainer. Anybody mind if I adopt it? crh pgpo9wFjbvroO.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Fink-devel] Fink-dev map
X-OpenPGP Key Fingerprint for Benn Newman: 8738 9074 7446 7DEC 2E67 0685 144E B994 F47C C6B1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1202670.oMBSj4l3At; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --nextPart1202670.oMBSj4l3At Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello all, I am making a map with Fink developers on it. If you are a developer for=20 =46ink, or maintain *a lot* of packages (I'll leave that up to you to decid= e=20 what a lot is, but it has to be quiet a few), and would like to be added to= =20 the map, please e-mail me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I already have dmacks,= =20 drm, RangerRick and cirdan. Please use the following format. Latitude Longitude First name 'irc nick on #fink (if applicable)' Last nam= e=20 #what you do (be short, something like developer or maintainer) If you do not know the Latitude and Longitude of your city, you can use=20 Wikipedia.=20 Here is a completed example: 40.47 -73.58 Daniel 'dmacks' Macks #project manager, maintainer I have posted what I have done so far at=20 gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/00/users/newmanbe/Random_Pictures_I_Have_Made/fin= kmap.png. Reminder: Don't send a post to the list, e-mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] g. =2D-=20 Benn Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] - SDF Public Access UNIX System gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/ http://sdf.lonestar.org/ Mailed by KMail Please avoid sending Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --nextPart1202670.oMBSj4l3At Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iEYEABECAAYFAkJ9N7MACgkQFE65lPR8xrE1zwCfRtpWHORar2R2Kbc0JgoBw998 UhEAn0KS8PtpBxbRaiaXaACrlaLnkbjm =vFoO -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nextPart1202670.oMBSj4l3At-- --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] darcs - can I adopt it?
On May 7, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Corey Halpin wrote: I noticed today that darcs has no maintainer. Anybody mind if I adopt it? speaking as the person who orphaned it a few months ago, go right ahead :) there might be a newer info file in my experimental directory, but I seem to remember there being a problem with it. -Lars Lars Rosengreen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.margay.org/~lars --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] darcs - can I adopt it?
On 2005-05-07, Lars Rosengreen wrote: speaking as the person who orphaned it a few months ago, go right ahead :) there might be a newer info file in my experimental directory, but I seem to remember there being a problem with it. Adopted now. I'll poke around in your experimental and see what I find. regards, crh pgpnu6IKhJudC.pgp Description: PGP signature
