Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran package

2005-07-28 Thread Jack Howarth
   Still one has to ask exactly which compilers in the gcc4 package
we should be focusing on? The gfortran compiler specifically is making
really good progress. With patches to be added today, it should pass
almost all of the NIST Fortran validation testsuite. I think we would be
far better off doing the same thing for gfortran as we do for g95. 
Sampling the source code at regular intervals. Since gcc 4.1 is into
stage 3, it is probably worthwhile testing that branch for gfortran
since most of the new features and fixes go into that branch first.
Better to help provide feedback now rather than to have to wait for
the 4.1.1 release.
  Jack


---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran package

2005-07-28 Thread Jean-François Mertens


On 28 Jul 2005, at 17:18, David R. Morrison wrote:

Also, there is some danger of confusion between the "gcc4" which is  
a virtual package that the system provides, designed to insure that  
users have the correct Apple gcc package installed, and the gcc4  
package...



The virtual pkg is gcc4.0

JF



---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran package

2005-07-28 Thread David R. Morrison


On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:43 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:



Peter,
   You may have point regarding the 4.1 branch, but I would say that
the 4.0.2 branch is highly unlikely to be much less stable for  
gfortran

than the 4.0.1 release is. Again the question really is what is the
purpose of the gcc4 package? If it is primarily a release mechanism
for gfortran, then it is debatable if that is the most stable release.
For instance, I don't even see the dejagnu lines in the gcc4.info
script so it is unclear how closely we are monitoring regressions
in gfortran relative to the gcc-testresults mailing list.
Jack




I'm not completely clear on why we have a gcc4 package at all.  From  
this discussion, it seems that it is *not* because of other compilers  
(since those are in separate packages)?  Also, there is some danger  
of confusion between the "gcc4" which is a virtual package that the  
system provides, designed to insure that users have the correct Apple  
gcc package installed, and the gcc4 package...


  -- Dave




---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September
19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel


Re: [Fink-devel] Giving up on ghc

2005-07-28 Thread Corey Halpin
  Good morning.
  I have a version of ghc in my experimental that works for me on Panther.
  http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/fink/experimental/crhalpin/

  I don't have access to a tiger box, so I can't test it there.

  If I could get someone else to verify that it works for them on panther,
I'll push it to unstable.  To do this verification,
  - download ghc.info, ghc.patch, darcs.info, darcs.patch and put them in
your /sw/fink/dists/local/main/finkinfo
  - fink install ghc 2>&1 | tee ghc.log
  if this fails, please mail me the ghc.log
  - fink install darcs 2>&1 | tee darcs.log
  if this fails, please mail me darcs.log
  - if nothing fails, celebrate.  :-)  Then mail me to let me know.

  If it actually works unmodified on Tiger, that'd be -really- neat.  But I
don't think it will.

regards,
crh


pgpZJVXPU49QT.pgp
Description: PGP signature