On June 23, 2005 11:08, Cian Hughes wrote:
I tried pretty hard with 5.2 patches, but ultimately I got the same
broken net-snmp that shiped with tiger, since 10.4.2 has been seeded to
developers they are actually obliged to release the patches, I've
emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] so hopefully they will reply shortly.
Regards,
Cian Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Six months after this discussion, we still have the same mess with the
net-snmp packages for Tiger: The 5.2.1 version in main does not build,
and the outdated 5.0.7 version in crypto does not build now either,
because it depends on autoconf which conflicts with autoconf2.5, and the
latter is depended on by a couple of other packages.
Cian, we are on 10.4.3 now and have been for quite a while; what is the
situation with the darwin sources of net-snmp now? Is the system
net-snmp still broken? And what about the new release 5.2.2?
If there is no working net-snmp package for Tiger soon, I think we will
have to revive the idea of scrapping this package altogether.
--
Martin
On 23 Meith 2005, at 09:12, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Thanks, Cian!
I was looking around the other day, and I got the impression that the
patches for 5.2 were available with the Darwin source. Assuming not
much has changed between 5.2 and 5.2.1, they'll probably be quite useful.
I guess it also depends on when 10.4.2 is out!
Jeremy.
On 23/06/2005, at 18:00, Cian Hughes wrote:
Yes, I'll take care of maintaining net-snmp, as soon as apple release
their patches for 5.2.1 (which they should do at the same time as
10.4.2) I'll work on adapting it to compile without the private headers.
Regards,
Cian Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23 Meith 2005, at 01:03, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
OK, I guess we keep the package, then!
Would anyone be prepared to take over the maintainership (?) for
net-snmp, in that case? As evidenced by my lack of activity in Fink,
I haven't (and still don't have) a great deal of spare time. If
there's someone who could maintain net-snmp a better better than I
have, then I'm sure Fink and the users of the package will benefit.
Otherwise, I'll have a go at getting 5.2.1 to work in the near future.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
On 22/06/2005, at 22:46, TheSin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I gotta be honest I don't like the idea of depending on apple for
this either.
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 22-Jun-05, at 4:21 AM, Cian Hughes wrote:
Just thought I'd point out that the system version is broken, it
crashes on some queries, apple have acknowledged this and it will
apparently be fixed with 10.4.2, there is potential here that we
may end up moving people from a working net-snmp (but old) to a
half broken new version.
Regards,
Cian Hughes
On 21 Jun 2005, at 16:20, TheSin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
php4 and php5 both depend on it, let me rework to link against
the system version and provide a good upgrade path.
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 21-Jun-05, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 20/06/2005, at 3:04, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jeremy Higgs wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to get a lot of my packages working on Tiger,
and have finally gotten around to net-snmp. I noticed (from
discussions on the list, and a bit of playing around) that
net-snmp 5.2 is actually included in the base system. Given
this, is there really a need for a net-snmp package? Perhaps
if someone wants an OpenSSL- enabled version...
On that note, there are some patches in the Darwin source.
(http://
darwinsource.opendarwin.org/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/patches/) Does
anyone know what the license is for these? I was hoping to
use these for the Fink package...
According to the license file on the server
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.1/net_snmp-16/net_snmp.txt,
the package has a BSD license. I would assume that this covers
the patches, too.
OTOH, it is perhaps a good idea to get rid of the package
altogether. On Panther already fink's version was older than
the system one.
Would anyone have any objections to this? I would tend to agree
with Martin, since it's included with the system now, and isn't
a terribly important package.
If there are no dependencies and no objections, I'll remove it
from the 10.4-transitional and 10.3 trees in the near future...
Thanks,
Jeremy.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCuDBI6wPs8J05MxMRApENAJ4g4dxjFJoo6GArVafbE/lJLJu8PgCdH+3o
icA1ERYOre7SiUY/ZXwyQuc=
=lCHz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration
Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and
