[Fink-devel] work-in-progress branch to install all compiler wrappers in the .deb
The current Fink release (0.36.4.1) dynamically generates the compiler wrappers for clang/clang++ (via functions in Fink::PkgVersion). We currently remove the wrappers when updating fink, and new ones are generated for the next build operation. This isn't 100% reliable, though. I've generated a work-in-progress branch in the fink github repository (i.e. I don't think it's quite ready to be a pull request) called compiler_wrapper_in_deb. As the name suggests, in this branch all of the compiler wrappers get installed in the .deb. Fink::PkgVersion hasn't been altered, because I haven't had time to explore the full ramifications of altering the wrapper generation there (not well commented or documented). For example, are temporary wrappers generated to build dpkg-bootstrap? Also, in the event of user error, in principle the various ensure* functions will attempt to regenerate the compiler wrappers, which is useful. Though I'd argue that it's poor from a maintenance standpoint to have separate copies of the wrapper scripts stored as heredocs within PkgVersion.pm and as normal files, which is what we've been doing for a while now. Anyway, feedback is appreciated. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -- Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Time to close 10.6 down officially?
Pros: 1) We're back to one architecture (albeit with two C++ ABI standards). 2) We're back to one package tree. 3) Fewer platforms to have to test base packages on. 4) No feelings of guilt for people who have been only updating for 10.7+ (OK, there probably aren't many of those). 5) Minimal effort to do it. We just ensure that the next fink release won't bootstrap on 10.6 and don't put a .info file there, rather than doing a 10.6-EOL directory (though that will also work). 6) Sorry, we don't support that OS any more has a nice ring to it. Cons: 1) People will complain. Though it's not like we said 10.6 is unsupported, so make sure to 'rm -rf /sw'. It'd be nice to get this done in a couple of weeks. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -- Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] r-base215. r-base-30 and r-base31
Baba,
I have added r-base31 packaging to the 10.7 tree and updated the
r-base215 and r-base30 packaging to build with gcc49-compiler like r-base31
and to be aware of the new package. The r-base214 packaging seems to have
test suite issues when built against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing examples for package ‘utils’
/sw/src/fink.build/r-base214-2.14.2-9/R-2.14.2/bin/BATCH: line 60: 34097
Trace/BPT trap: 5 ${R_HOME}/bin/R -f ${in} ${opts} ${R_BATCH_OPTIONS}
${out} 21
Error: testing 'utils' failed
Execution halted
There are quite a few differences between the r-base214 and r-base215 info
files so I am not sure what is the exact cause of the build issue. However,
since upstream no longer lists the 2.14.x series as supported on their home
page, we should just drop that package like we did with r-base213.
Jack
ps I also modified the rnmr-r.info file to be aware of the new r-base31
release and it builds fine against it.
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] r-base215. r-base-30 and r-base31
Jack,
2014/04/29 9:55、Jack Howarth howarth.at.f...@gmail.com のメール：
I have added r-base31 packaging to the 10.7 tree and updated the
r-base215 and r-base30 packaging to build with gcc49-compiler like r-base31
and to be aware of the new package. The r-base214 packaging seems to have
test suite issues when built against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing examples for package ‘utils’
/sw/src/fink.build/r-base214-2.14.2-9/R-2.14.2/bin/BATCH: line 60: 34097
Trace/BPT trap: 5 ${R_HOME}/bin/R -f ${in} ${opts} ${R_BATCH_OPTIONS}
${out} 21
Error: testing 'utils' failed
Execution halted
There are quite a few differences between the r-base214 and r-base215 info
files so I am not sure what is the exact cause of the build issue. However,
since upstream no longer lists the 2.14.x series as supported on their home
page, we should just drop that package like we did with r-base213.
Jack
ps I also modified the rnmr-r.info file to be aware of the new r-base31
release and it builds fine against it.
Thanks. I’ve have been too busy to commit r-base31.
We can drop 2.14, though some people may still be interested in 2.15.
FYI, there are several reports to R-SIG-Mac mailing list that some CRAN
packages do not work on R 3.1+Marvericks combination. Maybe because Marvericks
uses libc++ instead of libstdc++, but I haven’t looked yet.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mac/2014-April/thread.html
—
BABA Yoshihiko--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] r-base215. r-base-30 and r-base31
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:55:18 -0400, Jack Howarth
howarth.at.f...@gmail.com wrote:
The r-base214 packaging seems to have test suite issues when built
against Xcode 5.1 on darwin12…
Testing examples for package ‘utils’
/sw/src/fink.build/r-base214-2.14.2-9/R-2.14.2/bin/BATCH: line 60:
34097 Trace/BPT trap: 5 ${R_HOME}/bin/R -f ${in} ${opts}
${R_BATCH_OPTIONS} ${out} 21
Error: testing 'utils' failed
Execution halted
The failure appears to be due to an unresolved __pcre_valid_utf (or
similarly named) symbol in libR.dylib. The R library is trying to use
a private symbol in libpcre by guessing what it's called (and what its
parameters are) in various different libpcre versions, but our most
recent libpcre dropped that symbol altogether. Obviously a fragile
situation to rely on undocumented non-public content.
One useful change we can make is to patch out the -undefined
dynamic_lookup from the configure script. That flag causes undefined
symbols to be ignored by the linker, leaving them to cause problems at
runtime. By removing the flag, the linking itself fails right away
rather than leaving a possibly mis-built library.
There are quite a few differences between the r-base214 and r-base215
info files so I am not sure what is the exact cause of the build
issue. However, since upstream no longer lists the 2.14.x series as
supported on their home page, we should just drop that package like
we did with r-base213.
Looks like R now (as of 215) contains the actual internal pcre code it
wants (copied from pcre's sources), so it becomes insensitive to
changes in libpcre's internals. compare src/main/util.c around line
2159, and see the new valid_utf.h file added to support it.
dan
--
Daniel Macks
dma...@netspace.org
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
