[Fink-devel] Setting up gcc-4 as default compiler
Hi, I want to use gcc-4 as the compiler to build a package. I try to use "sudo gcc_select 4.x" but it do not work. What is the standard way to set up the a fink provided version as the default compiler? Thanks, Jose - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] abandoning Clisp packages
Hi, On Oct 13, 2006, at 6:24 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote: > Unfortunately, I am no longer able to support and maintain fink's > clisp packages, so I've gone ahead and marked them as abandoned. > Hopefully someone else will be interested in taking them over. If > not, I'll do my best to continue to update them as time permits. > I can pick them up! I am working on compiling it for the Intel platform and I hope being able to submit it soon. Jose - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Clisp and libsigsegv
The Intel version of clisp with a library needed for it. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?
On Nov 23, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Jorge Acereda Maciá wrote: > David H wrote: >> What feature would you _love_ to see in fink/Fink? >> Why (give us a short example what it would make easier for you) > > I've been quite a long time away from Fink (no Mac at hand), and maybe > these are already implemented. Here is a rough list anyway: > > - fink fetch : download package and dependencies > - fink extract : extract downloaded package > - fink patch : apply patch phase to package > - fink mkpatch : generate a patch from an extracted (and > posibly patched) source, just taking into account files named > .orig (that is, copy foo.c to foo.c.orig, then edit foo.c > and > it should generate automagically a patch) > - fink edit : edit file with $VISUAL (or $EDITOR) generating a > backup file .orig (preserving the existing .orig file if > present). > > You know, somewhat inspired in pkgsrc. Maybe we have things like that, > in that case I'd love to hear from other people's tricks (or any > pointer > to any documentation). I totally second this suggestion. As a new maintainer, the thing that I find more time consuming is having to repeat the hole process just to test a small change. It will be nice to be able to tell fink just to perform just one of the steps. (eg fink test ... for running the packages test) > > >> How do you feel the rest of the community would benefit from your >> request? > > Faster package development? People probably have already these scripts > written by themselves, but for the sporadic contributor it would be a > great help. > > > > -- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php? > page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] tomcat5 deprecated
This is my bad ... I promise to take care of tomcat to Benjamin very long time ago but I never did it. I will submit a new version to tomcat, tomcat4, and tomcat5 in the next few days. Jose On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Eric Lederrey wrote: >> Hi the version of tomcat5 don't compile because the version 5.5.26 >> doesn't exists on the mirrors anymore. >> I have patched the .info file to use the 5.5.28 version. The diff is >> below. >> >> Regards >> Eric Lederrey >> >> P.S: i sent an email last week to the maintainer, i don't know if >> it's >> because he is too busy or my mail was interpreted as a spam >> but I received no response. >> >> > > He's known to be busy right now. > > > - -- > Alexander Hansen > Fink User Liaison > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkq6cgsACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+uswCfT84vFpYQ9oj2oE6+YJhWMS7P > AgcAn0vT4oYjbqh0Vr2urZAiL85l9R8M > =OX9r > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market > and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] tomcat5 deprecated
I just updated tomcat4 and tomcat5 and add tomcat6 to the tracker. The URL are: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868454&group_id=17203 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868459&group_id=17203 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868478&group_id=17203 Jose On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Eric Lederrey wrote: >> Hi the version of tomcat5 don't compile because the version 5.5.26 >> doesn't exists on the mirrors anymore. >> I have patched the .info file to use the 5.5.28 version. The diff is >> below. >> >> Regards >> Eric Lederrey >> >> P.S: i sent an email last week to the maintainer, i don't know if >> it's >> because he is too busy or my mail was interpreted as a spam >> but I received no response. >> >> > > He's known to be busy right now. > > > - -- > Alexander Hansen > Fink User Liaison > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkq6cgsACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+uswCfT84vFpYQ9oj2oE6+YJhWMS7P > AgcAn0vT4oYjbqh0Vr2urZAiL85l9R8M > =OX9r > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart > your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market > and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register > now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] tomcat5 deprecated
I'm also willing to take ownership of the packages. On Sep 27, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Thanks. I'll drop an explicit cc to the maintainer about this. > > José H. Espinosa wrote: >> I just updated tomcat4 and tomcat5 and add tomcat6 to the tracker. >> The URL are: >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? >> func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868454&group_id=17203 >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? >> func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868459&group_id=17203 >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? >> func=detail&atid=414256&aid=2868478&group_id=17203 >> >> Jose >> >> On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >> Eric Lederrey wrote: >>>>> Hi the version of tomcat5 don't compile because the version >>>>> 5.5.26 >>>>> doesn't exists on the mirrors anymore. >>>>> I have patched the .info file to use the 5.5.28 version. The >>>>> diff is >>>>> below. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Eric Lederrey >>>>> >>>>> P.S: i sent an email last week to the maintainer, i don't know if >>>>> it's >>>>> because he is too busy or my mail was interpreted as a spam >>>>> but I received no response. >>>>> >>>>> >> He's known to be busy right now. >> >> >> > -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] Moving clisp to stable
Hi, I have a request from one of my users to move the current version of clisp to stable. I take a look at the dependencies that will need to be move to stable as part of the process and the only one that might be a little troublesome is libgettext3-* The other dependencies that will need to be moves are libsigsegv2 and ffcall but I don't see any reason for not moving them. Do we have any time frame to have livegettext3 move to stable? Or, if it will be possible to move clisp to stable by lowering the version of gettext? Thanks, Jose Espinosa -- Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Moving clisp to stable
On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:00:58 -0800,
> "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_H._Espinosa?=" wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> > I have a request from one of my users to move the current
> version of
> > clisp to stable.
> >
> > I take a look at the dependencies that will need to be move to
> stable
> > as part of the process and the only one that might be a little
> > troublesome is libgettext3-*
> >
> > The other dependencies that will need to be moves are
> libsigsegv2 and
> > ffcall but I don't see any reason for not moving them.
> >
> > Do we have any time frame to have livegettext3 move to stable? Or,
> > if it will be possible to move clisp to stable by lowering the
> > version of gettext?
>
> libgettext3-{dev,shlibs} has been in stable since about 2006. Heck,
> the
> clisp presently in stable is even already using it. In fact,
> libgettext3 is so old that many things have been shifting to using
> libgettext8-{dev,shlibs} instead over the past few months. No harm in
> staying with libgettext3, but I don't see how that affects anything.
>
> ffcall and libsigsegv2 look fine to move.
Excellent! Let me know what I need to do to make the move.
Jose
--
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] Moving clisp to stable
Hi Dan,
I was warned that the current version on clisp does not work with
Quicklisp anymore and was asked of updating it.
I don't see any technical problem on updating the current clips
version from unstable to stable. Please let me know what can I do to
speed up this process.
Thanks,
Jose
On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:00:58 -0800,
> "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_H._Espinosa?=" wrote:
> Hi,
> >
> > I have a request from one of my users to move the current
> version of
> > clisp to stable.
> >
> > I take a look at the dependencies that will need to be move to
> stable
> > as part of the process and the only one that might be a little
> > troublesome is libgettext3-*
> >
> > The other dependencies that will need to be moves are
> libsigsegv2 and
> > ffcall but I don't see any reason for not moving them.
> >
> > Do we have any time frame to have livegettext3 move to stable? Or,
> > if it will be possible to move clisp to stable by lowering the
> > version of gettext?
>
> libgettext3-{dev,shlibs} has been in stable since about 2006. Heck,
> the
> clisp presently in stable is even already using it. In fact,
> libgettext3 is so old that many things have been shifting to using
> libgettext8-{dev,shlibs} instead over the past few months. No harm in
> staying with libgettext3, but I don't see how that affects anything.
>
> ffcall and libsigsegv2 look fine to move.
>
> dan
>
>
> --
> Daniel Macks
> dma...@netspace.org
>
>
--
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] tomcat4 (and 5 and 6) downloadthemselves duringCompileScript
On Apr 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:50:39 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:37:23 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: >> They each have: >> > >> > CompileScript: rsync -avr --exclude=dist ./ dist/ >> > >> > which is a serious flaw. There is no guarantee that the builder will > >> > have network access. At least as importantly, it means a user might > get >> > a different ultimate package resuilt because the upstream > server's >> > contents could change. The whole aim of fink is to give > reproducible >> > results, which is why we even bother to have Version and > Revision fields >> > and checksums of the source and patchfiles. These > packages need to fixed >> > to encapsulate a specific snapshot of the > files that would be >> > downloaded. Looking further, there is also a sudo command being run during >> > InstallScript, which is not a valid thing to do...no guarantee the >> > build-machine will be attended and blocks all sorts of scripted build >> > processes. There are also chown commands...seems inconsistent that one >> > would need to sudo if one already has the power to chown? But even better >> > would be to do the chown in PostInst, so that the whole build process can >> > run in the --build-as-nobody sandbox (a mechanism that prevents all sorts >> > of runaway root-user commands). > > My spies tell me that the rsync is safe. I flagged it because every time I > tried to build (which failed for the other reasons stated) I saw network > access. Stupid coincidences:( So "package is busted but not *that* way". > dan I'm the maintainer of the package. Don't worry, I'll take a look at the package over the weekend. Jose -- For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
