Re: [Fink-devel] Updated mplayer (#1885675)
Hi folks! On Fri, April 11, 2008 4:10, James Bunton said: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:17:08PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> Following up: >> >> I've made a couple of changes on James' tracker item. It appeared to >> build >> OK as far as I could see. >> >> I'm cc'ing the current mplayer and libdvdnav maintainers > > Thanks Alexander. Those changes look good to me =) > Just a heads up: I've tried the packages from the tracker yesterday, and they work (Leopard/Intel). Keep up the good work! Ciao, Roland - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fuse vs. MacFUSE
Hi Brendan! On 7 Feb 2007, at 17:56, Brendan Cully wrote: On Wednesday, 07 February 2007 at 17:35, Roland Kuhn wrote: Now, with the Fink version there is no popup window, but hey, I'm glad to have a popup blocker in my browser ;-) So I mount server from the command line and voila: it works. There's even a new volume in the Finder, albeit named quite generic "FUSE Volume 0". The only "problem" is, that the eject button does not work, sometimes it closes the current view but it does not remove the icon or unmount the sshfs. Issuing 'umount ' removes the mount, but the sshfs process stays alive. That problem can be cured by "kill -9" (SIGTERM does not have an effect), but I have not found a way yet to get rid of that "FUSE Volume 0" lying on my Desktop. Double clicking simply opens a view into the empty directory which used to be the mount point. What is the status? From 'fink describe sshfs': Usage Notes: Invoking sshfs with the options -oping_diskarb,volname="finder volume name" will probably improve its interaction with the Finder. If you use -oping_diskarb, you should get much better behaviour out of the finder. Oh, my bad. I frequently forget 'fink desc'... This solves all my problems except for the sshfs and ssh processes: they still stay around after unmounting, and a view into /sw/share/doc/sshfs/* and 'mount_fusefs --help' didn't inspire me much :-( I've followed the advice in the FAQ.txt and run with - odebug,sshfs_debug,loglevel=debug, and in the end I don't see how sshfs should have noticed the unmount. Log attached; I've inserted two empty lines before pressing the eject button in the Finder window. Ciao, Roland sshfs.txt.bz2 Description: Binary data -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] fuse vs. MacFUSE
Hi! Having read about this marvellous achievement, I decided immediately to try fuse on my PowerBook. Using the Google-supplied MacFUSE and sshfs .dmg's it worked immediately and the way one would expect: you click on sshfs, enter the destination info into the window which pops up and find the fuse mount as a new volume in the finder. When you're done you click on the eject button and it's gone. Now, with the Fink version there is no popup window, but hey, I'm glad to have a popup blocker in my browser ;-) So I mount server from the command line and voila: it works. There's even a new volume in the Finder, albeit named quite generic "FUSE Volume 0". The only "problem" is, that the eject button does not work, sometimes it closes the current view but it does not remove the icon or unmount the sshfs. Issuing 'umount ' removes the mount, but the sshfs process stays alive. That problem can be cured by "kill -9" (SIGTERM does not have an effect), but I have not found a way yet to get rid of that "FUSE Volume 0" lying on my Desktop. Double clicking simply opens a view into the empty directory which used to be the mount point. What is the status? BTW: I installed Fuse.pm via cpan (had to use 'notest force' because the tests don't work), and fuseftp works as far as I could see. Being able to write my own filesystem in Perl sends shivers down my spine :-) A propos: no kernel panics yet ;-) I half expected to see my machine crash when playing bad games with the fuse processes, but the kext seems stable enough to handle a dead handler... Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gnupg2
Hi Corey! On 5 Dec 2006, at 18:09, Corey Halpin wrote: On 2006-12-05, Roland Kuhn wrote: Well, that was easy. Now, after also installing pinentry-gtk, of course, I can decrypt my mails in kmail and even use kwatchgnupg. But one thing is still missing: I cannot verify my X.509 signatures because of 'Not enough information to check signatures'. When starting kleopatra I get Well... I don't use kmail, pinentry-gtk, or kleopatra. So my experience here is a bit limited. :-) Thanks for searching anyway. A bit of googling for: kmail "Not enough information to check" finds a number of people experiencing similar problems. So maybe this isn't a fink-specific issue? There was a post on kdepim-users that looked like it might be useful: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-users&m=115436026616733&w=2 Does this help? No, I'm sorry. That user is one step ahead of me: he already can successfully use kleopatra ;-) I'll probably figure it out eventually... Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] gnupg2
Hi Corey!
On 5 Dec 2006, at 02:13, Corey Halpin wrote:
On 2006-12-03, Roland Kuhn wrote:
Just out of curiosity I wanted to install gnupg 2.0.1, so I updated
the info files for libgpg-error, libassuan and libksba8 and added a
gnupg2 package; all *.{info,patch} attached. It works for me (TM).
gnupg2 can be installed in parallel to the "old" gnupg 1.4.5 package.
Anyone interested in putting those packages into unstable?
I've put the updated libgpg-error in.
Great, thanks!
Thank you for doing the leg-work.
Well, that was easy. Now, after also installing pinentry-gtk, of
course, I can decrypt my mails in kmail and even use kwatchgnupg. But
one thing is still missing: I cannot verify my X.509 signatures
because of 'Not enough information to check signatures'. When
starting kleopatra I get
An error occurred while fetching the certificates from the backend:
Unknown system error
Meanwhile I've --import'ed my pkcs12 with gpgsm and "gpgsm --list-
keys" shows the right thing, so I'm a bit stuck. What else do I need?
I also compiled dirmngr (anyone interested in a .info?), but that
does not help. Below is the corresponding log from kwatchgnupg:
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> # Home: ~/.gnupg
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> # Config: /Users/
rkuhn/.gnupg/gpgsm.conf
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> # AgentInfo: /tmp/
gpg-39zq19/S.gpg-agent:9874:1
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> # DirmngrInfo: [not set]
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> OK GNU Privacy
Guard's S/M server 2.0.1 ready
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: <- OPTION display=:0
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: <- OPTION list-mode=1
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: <- OPTION with-validation=0
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:00 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: -> OK
38 - 2006-12-05 14:15:01 gpgsm[10188.0] DBG: <- [EOF]
BTW: I've set 'disable-{policy,crl}-checks' in gpgsm.conf.
Ciao,
Roland
--
TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching
Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570
--
CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482
--
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M
+ !V Y+
PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] mailman breaks signatures?
Hi folks! My mail from 0:06 got mangled by mailman in a way that broke both digital signatures attached to it: it reformatted the MIME headers of all parts, which is a problem since the attachments are also encapsulated in the signed block. This is definitely not good style, so who do I complain to? Is it a mailman configuration problem or is it intrinsic to mailman operation? I've never seen this before, that's why I ask here first... Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482 -- Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] gnupg2
Hi!
Just out of curiosity I wanted to install gnupg 2.0.1, so I updated
the info files for libgpg-error, libassuan and libksba8 and added a
gnupg2 package; all *.{info,patch} attached. It works for me (TM).
gnupg2 can be installed in parallel to the "old" gnupg 1.4.5 package.
Anyone interested in putting those packages into unstable?
Ciao,
Roland
gnupg2.info
Description: Binary data
gnupg2.patch
Description: Binary data
libassuan.info
Description: Binary data
libgpg-error.info
Description: Binary data
libksba8.info
Description: Binary data
--
TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching
Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570
--
CERN office: 892-1-D23 phone: +41 22 7676540 mobile: +41 76 487 4482
--
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both. - Benjamin Franklin
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M
+ !V Y+
PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] kdelibs3 still does not compile
Dear experts! Following advice here on the list I checked that I really have doxygen (1.4.6-1) installed via fink, and I still cannot build the kdelibs3-unified packages. doxygen receives a SIGBUS while doing this: Making apidox in kio mkdir -p -- ../apidocs/kio make[2]: *** [apidox-am-yes] Error 138 make[1]: *** [apidox] Error 2 make: *** [apidox] Error 1 kdelibs3-unified-3.4.3-22 apidox-build failed! ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.AApO71 failed, exit code 1 Does anybody know a fix or even workaround? Can the apidox step be disabled? I do not plan to develop KDE apps anytime soon... Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -Doug Gwyn -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] Re: openexr confused about libraries
Hi Daniel! On 24 Jan 2006, at 05:51, Daniel E. Macks wrote: The "real" problem is that the upstream author didn't know you can point libtool to ../foo/libfoo.la instead of using -lfoo and then playing games with -L search ordering to find libfoo. Is fixed. Thanks, it works. I like that PatchScript: line :-) Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -Doug Gwyn -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Fink-devel] openexr confused about libraries
Dear experts! I'm using 10.4-transitional/unstable and just did a selfupdate, which didn't have to compile anything. update-all then stopped with a linker error from openEXR: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link g++-3.3 -pipe -g -O2 -Wno-long- double -L/sw/lib -o exrheader -L../Iex -L../Half -L../Imath -L../ IlmImf -lIlmImf -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz main.o g++-3.3 -pipe -g -O2 -Wno-long-double -o exrheader main.o -Wl,- bind_at_load -L/sw/lib -L/sw/src/fink.build/openexr-1.2.2-21/ OpenEXR-1.2.2/Iex -L/sw/src/fink.build/openexr-1.2.2-21/OpenEXR-1.2.2/ Half -L/sw/src/fink.build/openexr-1.2.2-21/OpenEXR-1.2.2/Imath -L/sw/ src/fink.build/openexr-1.2.2-21/OpenEXR-1.2.2/IlmImf /sw/lib/ libIlmImf.a /sw/lib/libImath.a /sw/lib/libHalf.a /sw/lib/libIex.a -lz ld: Undefined symbols: __ZN3Imf8TimeCodeC1ERKS0_ __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode10perfOffsetEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode11filmMfcCodeEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode13perfsPerCountEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode13perfsPerFrameEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode5countEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode6prefixEv __ZNK3Imf7KeyCode8filmTypeEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode10colorFrameEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode10fieldPhaseEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode4bgf0Ev __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode4bgf1Ev __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode4bgf2Ev __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode5frameEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode5hoursEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode7minutesEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode7secondsEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode8userDataEv __ZNK3Imf8TimeCode9dropFrameEv __ZNK3Imf9InputFile10isCompleteEv make: *** [exrheader] Error 1 It seems like the early mention of "-L/sw/lib" makes libtool use the old version of libIlmImf from the system directory instead of the newly compiled one. The hotfix would be to deinstall the package when compiling a new version, but that's ugly beyond words. As I'm relatively new to this business I don't know how to properly fix it, but I see at least two possible ways: - The culprit is the definition of CXXLINK, including LDFLAGS, so we remove that and add it to the LDADDs - We set LDFLAGS to the empty string and add /sw/lib to the LDADDs Is there a better way? Which one is preferred? I might be able to produce a new openexr.patch once I receive a 'go'. Ciao, Roland -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -Doug Gwyn -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Fink-devel] building kdelibs3-unified-3.4.3-22 fails in apidox
Dear experts! After a recent fink selfupdate I tried update-all, which failed after some hours when compiling kdelibs3-unified. The original error message is nonexistant (make telling me of exit status 138, nothing else), so I ran 'make -n' and figured out that '/sw/bin/doxygen Doxyfile' in kio/ gets a Bus error. Attached you can find the Doxyfile (changed so that errors are printed) together with the output (stdout+stderr combined) of 'sudo doxygen Doxyfile'. I'm not an expert on this, but I vaguely remember that this happened already several months ago, but I can't recall what I did then to work around it. I am running MacOS X 10.4.4, XCode 2.2 and Apple's X11. Tell me if you need more information. Ciao, Roland Doxyfile.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data out.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- TU Muenchen, Physik-Department E18, James-Franck-Str., 85748 Garching Telefon 089/289-12575; Telefax 089/289-12570 -- UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -Doug Gwyn -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GS/CS/M/MU d-(++) s:+ a-> C+++ UL P+++ L+++ E(+) W+ !N K- w--- M + !V Y+ PGP++ t+(++) 5 R+ tv-- b+ DI++ e+++> h y+++ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Fink-devel] Using getopt_long
Hi Stephane!
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Stephane Letz wrote:
> I'm porting a software that need the getopt_long function.
>
> I installed the Fink gengetopt package but it seems that this package does
> not provide a library for the needed function.
>
This might not be what you want, however, I worked around this with the
following code:
/* getopt_long is not available on some systems, even if they have glibc2.2 */
#if HAVE_GETOPT_H
#include
#else
#include
#define getopt_long(a,b,c,d,e) getopt(a,b,c)
struct option {
const char *name;
enum { required_argument, no_argument } arg;
void *unused;
charval;
};
#endif
This worked for me, because the returned val is the same in both cases. (Of
course I added getopt.h to AC_CHECK_HEADERS.)
BTW: does anybody have an idea why this acclaimed GLIBC2.2 of the Developer
Tools doesn't have getopt_long? Or is it an addition in Linux only, that is not
even "GNU standard"?
Ciao,
Roland
+---+-+
|TU Muenchen| |
|Physik-Department E18 | Raum3558 |
|James-Franck-Str. | Telefon 089/289-12592 |
|85747 Garching | |
+---+-+
"If you think NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question."
- Paul Stephens
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
